211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32681419)
1. Photopic negative response using a handheld mini-ganzfeld stimulator in healthy adults: normative values, intra- and inter-session variability.
Berezovsky A; Karanjia R; Fernandes AG; Botelho GIS; Bueno TLN; Ferraz NN; Sacai PY; Coupland SG; Sadun AA; Salomão SR
Doc Ophthalmol; 2021 Apr; 142(2):153-163. PubMed ID: 32681419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intensity response function of the photopic negative response (PhNR): effect of age and test-retest reliability.
Joshi NR; Ly E; Viswanathan S
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug; 135(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 28508299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inter-subject, inter-ocular and inter-session repeatability of the photopic negative response of the electroretinogram recorded using DTL and skin electrodes.
Mortlock KE; Binns AM; Aldebasi YH; North RV
Doc Ophthalmol; 2010 Oct; 121(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 20607349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between broadband and monochromatic photopic negative response in full-field electroretinogram in controls and subjects with primary open-angle glaucoma.
Banerjee A; Khurana M; Sachidanandam R; Sen P
Doc Ophthalmol; 2019 Feb; 138(1):21-33. PubMed ID: 30635745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter-ocular and inter-session reliability of the electroretinogram photopic negative response (PhNR) in non-human primates.
Fortune B; Bui BV; Cull G; Wang L; Cioffi GA
Exp Eye Res; 2004 Jan; 78(1):83-93. PubMed ID: 14667830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The photopic negative response of the Light-adapted 3.0 ERG in clinical settings.
Ortiz G; Drucker D; Hyde C; Staffetti J; Kremers J; Tzekov R
Doc Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 140(2):115-128. PubMed ID: 31571069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of Spectral Characteristics of Ganzfeld Stimuli on the Photopic Negative Response (PhNR) of the ERG.
Rangaswamy NV; Shirato S; Kaneko M; Digby BI; Robson JG; Frishman LJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Oct; 48(10):4818-28. PubMed ID: 17898309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of photopic negative response measurements in the time and time-frequency domains.
Kundra H; Park JC; McAnany JJ
Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Oct; 133(2):91-98. PubMed ID: 27562839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The relationship between stimulus intensity and response amplitude for the photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram.
Binns AM; Mortlock KE; North RV
Doc Ophthalmol; 2011 Feb; 122(1):39-52. PubMed ID: 21243403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional Loss of the Inner Retina in Childhood Optic Gliomas Detected by Photopic Negative Response.
Abed E; Piccardi M; Rizzo D; Chiaretti A; Ambrosio L; Petroni S; Parrilla R; Dickmann A; Riccardi R; Falsini B
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Apr; 56(4):2469-74. PubMed ID: 25634980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina.
Rangaswamy NV; Frishman LJ; Dorotheo EU; Schiffman JS; Bahrani HM; Tang RA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Oct; 45(10):3827-37. PubMed ID: 15452095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of photopic negative response (PhNR) between focal macular and full-field electroretinograms in monkeys.
Kinoshita J; Takada S; Iwata N; Tani Y
Doc Ophthalmol; 2016 Jun; 132(3):177-87. PubMed ID: 27071393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in multiple sclerosis.
Wang J; Cheng H; Hu YS; Tang RA; Frishman LJ
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2012 Mar; 53(3):1315-23. PubMed ID: 22273726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.
Viswanathan S; Frishman LJ; Robson JG; Harwerth RS; Smith EL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1999 May; 40(6):1124-36. PubMed ID: 10235545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Response Characteristics and Retinal Origin of the Photopic Negative Response of the Electroretinogram in Dogs.
Takada S; Kinoshita J; Iwata N; Imaoka M; Tani Y
Curr Eye Res; 2017 Sep; 42(9):1302-1307. PubMed ID: 28557626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correlation between photopic negative response and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and optic disc topography in glaucomatous eyes.
Machida S; Gotoh Y; Toba Y; Ohtaki A; Kaneko M; Kurosaka D
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2008 May; 49(5):2201-7. PubMed ID: 18436853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significant correlations between photopic negative response, afferent pupillary defect, and mean defects of visual fields in asymmetric optic nerve disorders.
Okuno T; Kida T; Ikeda T; Oku H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2020 Aug; 258(8):1821-1827. PubMed ID: 32080769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. ISCEV extended protocol for the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the full-field electroretinogram.
Frishman L; Sustar M; Kremers J; McAnany JJ; Sarossy M; Tzekov R; Viswanathan S
Doc Ophthalmol; 2018 Jun; 136(3):207-211. PubMed ID: 29855761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.
Wilsey L; Gowrisankaran S; Cull G; Hardin C; Burgoyne CF; Fortune B
Doc Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 134(2):111-128. PubMed ID: 28243926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Pattern-reversal electroretinogram (PERG): a normative study in adults].
Alves LD; Berezovsky A; Sacai PY; Pereira JM; Salomão SR
Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2010; 73(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 20730277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
