BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32681859)

  • 1. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
    Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
    Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the efficacy of prophylactic extended field irradiation in the concomitant chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer, stage IIIB in the 2018 FIGO classification.
    Meng Q; Liu X; Wang W; Hou X; Lian X; Sun S; Yan J; Liu Z; Miao Z; Hu K; Zhang F
    Radiat Oncol; 2019 Dec; 14(1):228. PubMed ID: 31842919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Outcomes and prognostic factors of distant metastasis in patients with advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy].
    Ma R; Zhang H; Zou L; Qu Y
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Feb; 50(2):125-30. PubMed ID: 25877610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy incorporating high-dose rate brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma: survival outcomes, patterns of failure, and prognostic factors.
    Teh J; Yap SP; Tham I; Sethi VK; Chua EJ; Yeo R; Ho TH; Tay EH; Chia YN; Soh LT; Khoo-Tan HS
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Apr; 20(3):428-33. PubMed ID: 20375809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perioperative morbidity and rate of upstaging after laparoscopic staging for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: results of a prospective randomized trial.
    Köhler C; Mustea A; Marnitz S; Schneider A; Chiantera V; Ulrich U; Scharf JP; Martus P; Vieira MA; Tsunoda A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):503.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25986030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic factors in definitive radiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer.
    Yalman D; Aras AB; Ozkök S; Duransoy A; Celik OK; Ozsaran Z; Haydaroğlu A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(3-4):309-14. PubMed ID: 12807246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Oncologic outcomes in the era of modern radiation therapy using FIGO 2018 staging system for cervical cancer.
    Brodeur MN; Dejean R; Beauchemin MC; Samouëlian V; Cormier B; Bacha OM; Warkus T; Barkati M
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 34059350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lacunae in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) classification for cervical carcinoma: observational study using TNM classification as comparator.
    Meva J; Chaudhary RK; Bhaduri D; Bhatia M; Hatti S; Ba R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Jul; 23(6):1071-7. PubMed ID: 23792602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operable Stages IB and II cervical carcinomas: a retrospective study comparing preoperative uterovaginal brachytherapy and postoperative radiotherapy.
    Atlan D; Touboul E; Deniaud-Alexandre E; Lefranc JP; Antoine JM; Jannet D; Lhuillier P; Uzan M; Huart J; Genestie C; Antoine M; Jamali M; Ganansia V; Milliez J; Uzan S; Blondon J
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):780-93. PubMed ID: 12377330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Surgical versus clinical staging prior to primary chemoradiation in patients with cervical cancer FIGO stages IIB-IVA: oncologic results of a prospective randomized international multicenter (Uterus-11) intergroup study.
    Marnitz S; Tsunoda AT; Martus P; Vieira M; Affonso Junior RJ; Nunes J; Budach V; Hertel H; Mustea A; Sehouli J; Scharf JP; Ulrich U; Ebert A; Piwonski I; Kohler C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Dec; 30(12):1855-1861. PubMed ID: 33293284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Risk Stratification for Patients with Cervical Cancer in Stage IIIC1 of the 2018 FIGO Staging System.
    Liu X; Wang W; Hu K; Zhang F; Hou X; Yan J; Meng Q; Zhou Z; Miao Z; Guan H; Ma J; Shen J; Zhen H; Wang W
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):362. PubMed ID: 31941966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. High dose-rate brachytherapy for elderly patients with uterine cervical cancer.
    Chen SW; Liang JA; Yang SN; Lin FJ
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2003 May; 33(5):221-8. PubMed ID: 12865465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of epidermal growth factor receptor expression on disease-free survival and rate of pelvic relapse in patients with advanced cancer of the cervix treated with chemoradiotherapy.
    Pérez-Regadera J; Sánchez-Muñoz A; De-la-Cruz J; Ballestín C; Lora D; García-Martín R; Sotoca A; Pérez-Ruiz E; Lanzós E
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2011 Aug; 34(4):395-400. PubMed ID: 20859196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study.
    Knoth J; Pötter R; Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM; Haie-Meder C; Fokdal L; Sturdza A; Hoskin P; Mahantshetty U; Segedin B; Bruheim K; Wiebe E; Rai B; Cooper R; van der Steen-Banasik E; van Limbergen E; Pieters BR; Sundset M; Tan LT; Nout RA; Tanderup K; Kirisits C; Nesvacil N; Lindegaard JC; Schmid MP
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):136-141. PubMed ID: 32798000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of the prognostic value of F-18 FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters of primary tumors and MRI findings in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
    Dag Z; Yilmaz B; Dogan AK; Aksan DU; Ozkurt H; Kızılkaya HO; Arslan D
    Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(2):154-162. PubMed ID: 30594422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cisplatin Chemoradiotherapy vs Radiotherapy in FIGO Stage IIIB Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Shrivastava S; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Chopra S; Hawaldar R; Hande V; Kerkar RA; Maheshwari A; Shylasree TS; Ghosh J; Bajpai J; Gurram L; Gulia S; Gupta S;
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Apr; 4(4):506-513. PubMed ID: 29423520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Prognosis and Risk Stratification Based on Pelvic Lymph Node Characteristics in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.
    Li X; Wei LC; Zhang Y; Zhao LN; Li WW; Ping LJ; Dang YZ; Hu J; Shi M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1472-9. PubMed ID: 27400321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computed Tomography-Planned High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy for Treating Uterine Cervical Cancer.
    Zolciak-Siwinska A; Gruszczynska E; Bijok M; Jonska-Gmyrek J; Dabkowski M; Staniaszek J; Michalski W; Kowalczyk A; Milanowska K
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Sep; 96(1):87-92. PubMed ID: 27375169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.