248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32681995)
1. Randomized Study Comparing a Reusable Morcellator with a Resectoscope in the Hysteroscopic Treatment of Uterine Polyps: The RESMO Study.
Stoll F; Lecointre L; Meyer N; Faller E; Host A; Hummel M; Boisrame T; Akladios C; Garbin O
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):801-810. PubMed ID: 32681995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of whether there is residual polyp tissue after hysteroscopic morcellation at Cam and Sakura City Hospital: a retrospective cohort study.
Sivas MC; Ohanoglu Cetinel K; Arslan HS
BMC Womens Health; 2024 Feb; 24(1):133. PubMed ID: 38378558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hysteroscopic Endometrial Polypectomy with Manual Vacuum Aspiration Compared to Mechanical Morcellation.
Baikpour M; Hurd WW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(6):1050-1055. PubMed ID: 30308305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal of Endometrial Polyps: Hysteroscopic Morcellation versus Bipolar Resectoscopy, A Randomized Trial.
Hamerlynck TW; Schoot BC; van Vliet HA; Weyers S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(7):1237-43. PubMed ID: 26192235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Manual morcellation (Resectr™ 9Fr) vs electromechanical morcellation (TruClear™) for hysteroscopic polypectomy: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
van Wessel S; Hamerlynck T; van Vliet H; Schoot B; Weyers S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2023 Feb; 102(2):209-217. PubMed ID: 36680382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Hysteroscopic polypectomy: a comparison between 22 Fr and 26 Fr resectoscopes under paracervical block anesthesia, a randomized controlled study.
Remondi C; Sesti F; Sorrenti G; Venezia G; Sorge R; Pietropolli A; Silvi B; Piccione E
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2018 Dec; 27(6):339-346. PubMed ID: 29543077
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysteroscopic morcellation compared with electrical resection of endometrial polyps: a randomized controlled trial.
Smith PP; Middleton LJ; Connor M; Clark TJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Apr; 123(4):745-51. PubMed ID: 24785600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Hysteroscopic morcellation vs. curettage for removal of retained products of conception: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Wagenaar LP; Hamerlynck TW; Radder CM; Peters LW; Weyers S; Schoot BC; van Vliet HA
Fertil Steril; 2023 Dec; 120(6):1243-1251. PubMed ID: 37657600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hysteroscopic morcellator for removal of intrauterine polyps and myomas: a randomized controlled pilot study among residents in training.
van Dongen H; Emanuel MH; Wolterbeek R; Trimbos JB; Jansen FW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 18588849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [New in hysteroscopy: hysteroscopic morcellators].
Garbin O; Schwartz L
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2014 Dec; 42(12):872-6. PubMed ID: 25453907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Hysteroscopic morcellation versus bipolar resection for endometrial polyp removal].
Hamidouche A; Vincienne M; Thubert T; Trichot C; Demoulin G; Rivain AL; Deffieux X
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2015 Feb; 43(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 25595942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hysteroscopic Tissue Removal Systems: A Randomized In Vitro Comparison.
Meulenbroeks D; Hamerlynck TW; Saglam-Kara S; Van Rijssel NK; Van Vliet HA; Schoot BC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 24(1):159-164. PubMed ID: 27597661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Hysteroscopic morcellation: review of the manufacturer and user facility device experience (MAUDE) database.
Haber K; Hawkins E; Levie M; Chudnoff S
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 22(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 25128851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysteroscopic morcellation versus bipolar resection for removal of type 0 and 1 submucous myomas: A randomized trial.
van Wessel S; van Vliet HAAM; Schoot BC; Weyers S; Hamerlynck TWO
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Apr; 259():32-37. PubMed ID: 33571839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysteroscopic Morcellation Versus Loop Resection for Removal of Placental Remnants: A Randomized Trial.
Hamerlynck TW; van Vliet HA; Beerens AS; Weyers S; Schoot BC
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2016; 23(7):1172-1180. PubMed ID: 27590568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraoperative and Postoperative Clinical Evaluation of the Hysteroscopic Morcellator System for Endometrial Polypectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind, Parallel Group Comparison Study.
Tsuchiya A; Komatsu Y; Matsuyama R; Tsuchiya H; Takemura Y; Nishii O
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2018; 7(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 30254929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. New mini-resectoscope: analysis of preliminary quality results in outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy.
Dealberti D; Riboni F; Prigione S; Pisani C; Rovetta E; Montella F; Garuti G
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Aug; 288(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 23417150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mini-resectoscope vs morcellator for in-office hysteroscopic myomectomy: Evaluation of results and patient satisfaction.
Valero I; García-Jiménez R; Florez N; Weber-Fernandez AM; Oña López MR; Lara MD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Mar; 270():95-99. PubMed ID: 35033932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of hysteroscopic mechanical tissue removal with bipolar electrical resection for the management of endometrial polyps in an ambulatory care setting: preliminary results.
Pampalona JR; Bastos MD; Moreno GM; Pust AB; Montesdeoca GE; Guerra Garcia A; Pruñonosa JC; Collado RC; Torras PB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 25497165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing hysteroscopic morcellation with resectoscopy for patients with endometrial lesions.
Li C; Dai Z; Gong Y; Xie B; Wang B
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2017 Jan; 136(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 28099700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
