137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32682545)
1. The efficiency of devices intended to reduce microfibre release during clothes washing.
Napper IE; Barrett AC; Thompson RC
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Oct; 738():140412. PubMed ID: 32682545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The contribution of washing processes of synthetic clothes to microplastic pollution.
De Falco F; Di Pace E; Cocca M; Avella M
Sci Rep; 2019 Apr; 9(1):6633. PubMed ID: 31036862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the age of garments used under real-life conditions on microfibre release from polyester and cotton clothing.
Fernandes AN; Lara LZ; De Falco F; Turner A; Thompson RC
Environ Pollut; 2024 May; 348():123806. PubMed ID: 38493865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Examining the release of synthetic microfibres to the environment via two major pathways: Atmospheric deposition and treated wastewater effluent.
Napper IE; Parker-Jurd FNF; Wright SL; Thompson RC
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Jan; 857(Pt 1):159317. PubMed ID: 36220472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of microplastic release caused by textile washing processes of synthetic fabrics.
De Falco F; Gullo MP; Gentile G; Di Pace E; Cocca M; Gelabert L; Brouta-Agnésa M; Rovira A; Escudero R; Villalba R; Mossotti R; Montarsolo A; Gavignano S; Tonin C; Avella M
Environ Pollut; 2018 May; 236():916-925. PubMed ID: 29107418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Washing load influences the microplastic release from polyester fabrics by affecting wettability and mechanical stress.
Volgare M; De Falco F; Avolio R; Castaldo R; Errico ME; Gentile G; Ambrogi V; Cocca M
Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):19479. PubMed ID: 34593897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Plastic microfibre pollution: how important is clothes' laundering?
Gaylarde C; Baptista-Neto JA; da Fonseca EM
Heliyon; 2021 May; 7(5):e07105. PubMed ID: 34095591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantification of microfibre release from textiles during domestic laundering.
Hazlehurst A; Tiffin L; Sumner M; Taylor M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):43932-43949. PubMed ID: 36680713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Release of synthetic microplastic plastic fibres from domestic washing machines: Effects of fabric type and washing conditions.
Napper IE; Thompson RC
Mar Pollut Bull; 2016 Nov; 112(1-2):39-45. PubMed ID: 27686821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Man-made natural and regenerated cellulosic fibres greatly outnumber microplastic fibres in the atmosphere.
Finnegan AMD; Süsserott R; Gabbott SE; Gouramanis C
Environ Pollut; 2022 Oct; 310():119808. PubMed ID: 35926740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The possible routes of microplastics uptake in sea cucumber Holothuria cinerascens (Brandt, 1835).
Iwalaye OA; Moodley GK; Robertson-Andersson DV
Environ Pollut; 2020 Sep; 264():114644. PubMed ID: 32559857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment.
Henry B; Laitala K; Klepp IG
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Feb; 652():483-494. PubMed ID: 30368178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Pore-size and polymer affect the ability of filters for washing-machines to reduce domestic emissions of fibres to sewage.
Browne MA; Ros M; Johnston EL
PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234248. PubMed ID: 32559201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Microplastic study reveals the presence of natural and synthetic fibres in the diet of King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus) foraging from South Georgia.
Le Guen C; Suaria G; Sherley RB; Ryan PG; Aliani S; Boehme L; Brierley AS
Environ Int; 2020 Jan; 134():105303. PubMed ID: 31726359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pectin based finishing to mitigate the impact of microplastics released by polyamide fabrics.
De Falco F; Gentile G; Avolio R; Errico ME; Di Pace E; Ambrogi V; Avella M; Cocca M
Carbohydr Polym; 2018 Oct; 198():175-180. PubMed ID: 30092988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using a forensic science approach to minimize environmental contamination and to identify microfibres in marine sediments.
Woodall LC; Gwinnett C; Packer M; Thompson RC; Robinson LF; Paterson GL
Mar Pollut Bull; 2015 Jun; 95(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 25936572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of different microplastic fibres discharged from textiles in machine wash and tumble drying.
Kärkkäinen N; Sillanpää M
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(13):16253-16263. PubMed ID: 33340055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Synthesis of dominant plastic microfibre prevalence and pollution control feasibility in Chinese freshwater environments.
Xu Y; Chan FKS; Stanton T; Johnson MF; Kay P; He J; Wang J; Kong C; Wang Z; Liu D; Xu Y
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Aug; 783():146863. PubMed ID: 33872912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Characterization of Microplastics Released Based on Polyester Fabric Construction during Washing and Drying.
Choi S; Kwon M; Park MJ; Kim J
Polymers (Basel); 2021 Dec; 13(24):. PubMed ID: 34960828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Study on the Relationship between Textile Microplastics Shedding and Fabric Structure.
Cui H; Xu C
Polymers (Basel); 2022 Dec; 14(23):. PubMed ID: 36501706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
