These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32682645)
1. Evaluating the accuracy of resection planes in mandibular surgery using a preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative approach. Brouwer de Koning SG; Ter Braak TP; Geldof F; van Veen RLP; van Alphen MJA; Karssemakers LHE; Schreuder WH; Karakullukcu MB Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 Mar; 50(3):287-293. PubMed ID: 32682645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A surgical navigated cutting guide for mandibular osteotomies: accuracy and reproducibility of an image-guided mandibular osteotomy. Ter Braak TP; Brouwer de Koning SG; van Alphen MJA; van der Heijden F; Schreuder WH; van Veen RLP; Karakullukcu MB Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2020 Oct; 15(10):1719-1725. PubMed ID: 32725399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of virtually 3D planned resection templates in mandibular reconstruction. Weijs WL; Coppen C; Schreurs R; Vreeken RD; Verhulst AC; Merkx MA; Bergé SJ; Maal TJ J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 44(11):1828-1832. PubMed ID: 27713052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are three-dimensional patient-specific cutting guides for open wedge high tibial osteotomy accurate? An in vitro study. Donnez M; Ollivier M; Munier M; Berton P; Podgorski JP; Chabrand P; Parratte S J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 13(1):171. PubMed ID: 29986731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The usefulness of cutting guides for resection or biopsy of mandibular lesions: A technical note and case report. De Ketele A; Meeus J; Shaheen E; Verstraete L; Politis C J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 124(1):101272. PubMed ID: 36031147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Condylar Position is Maintained in Maxillomandibular Advancement Surgery Utilizing Custom Cutting Guides and Plates. Dai Z; Connelly ST; Silva R; Gupta RJ J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Feb; 81(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 36410398 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Supporting mandibular resection with intraoperative navigation utilizing augmented reality technology - A proof of concept study. Pietruski P; Majak M; Światek-Najwer E; Żuk M; Popek M; Mazurek M; Świecka M; Jaworowski J J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2019 Jun; 47(6):854-859. PubMed ID: 30914226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy assessment of surgical planning and three-dimensional-printed patient-specific guides for orthopaedic osteotomies. Sys G; Eykens H; Lenaerts G; Shumelinsky F; Robbrecht C; Poffyn B Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2017 Jun; 231(6):499-508. PubMed ID: 28639516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Novel Treatment Planning of Hemimandibular Hyperplasia by the Use of Three-Dimensional Computer-Aided-Design and Computer-Aided-Manufacturing Technologies. Hatamleh MM; Yeung E; Osher J; Huppa C J Craniofac Surg; 2017 May; 28(3):764-767. PubMed ID: 28468161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method. Bobek S; Farrell B; Choi C; Farrell B; Weimer K; Tucker M J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 73(6):1143-58. PubMed ID: 25795181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of stereolithographic drilling and cutting guides in bilateral mandibular distraction. Seeberger R; Davids R; Kater W; Thiele OC J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Nov; 22(6):2031-5. PubMed ID: 22067855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of virtual planning in orthognathic surgery: a systematic review. Alkhayer A; Piffkó J; Lippold C; Segatto E Head Face Med; 2020 Dec; 16(1):34. PubMed ID: 33272289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electromagnetic surgical navigation in patients undergoing mandibular surgery. Brouwer de Koning SG; Geldof F; van Veen RLP; van Alphen MJA; Karssemakers LHE; Nijkamp J; Schreuder WH; Ruers TJM; Karakullukcu MB Sci Rep; 2021 Feb; 11(1):4657. PubMed ID: 33633247 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional postoperative accuracy of extra-articular forearm osteotomies using CT-scan based patient-specific surgical guides. Vlachopoulos L; Schweizer A; Graf M; Nagy L; Fürnstahl P BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Nov; 16():336. PubMed ID: 26537949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of the modified tooth-supported 3D printing surgical guides based on CT, CBCT, and intraoral scanning in maxillofacial region: A comparison study. Liu Z; Zhong Y; Lyu X; Zhang J; Huang M; Liu S; Zheng L J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Oct; 125(5S2):101853. PubMed ID: 38555078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of mandibular repositioning surgery using new technology: Computer-aided design and manufacturing customized surgical cutting guides and fixation plates. Yoo HJ; Hartsfield JK; Mian AS; Allan BP; Naoum S; Lee RJH; Goonewardene MS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Mar; 163(3):357-367.e3. PubMed ID: 36503861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [How to make your own custom cutting guides for both mandibular and fibular stair step osteotomies?]. Rem K; Bosc R; De Kermadec H; Hersant B; Meningaud JP Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2017 Dec; 62(6):652-658. PubMed ID: 28456427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative study of three kinds of fibula cutting guides in reshaping fibula for the reconstruction of mandible: An accuracy simulation study in vitro. Dong Z; Li B; Xie R; Wu Q; Zhang L; Bai S J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Aug; 45(8):1227-1235. PubMed ID: 28529102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]