199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32683317)
1. Factors affecting DNA recovery from cartridge cases.
Jansson L; Forsberg C; Akel Y; Dufva C; Ansell C; Ansell R; Hedman J
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102343. PubMed ID: 32683317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridge cases: A comparison of swabbing, tape lifting, vacuum filtration, and direct PCR.
Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; Gunn P; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int; 2020 Dec; 317():110507. PubMed ID: 32977300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Development of STR profiles from firearms and fired cartridge cases.
Horsman-Hall KM; Orihuela Y; Karczynski SL; Davis AL; Ban JD; Greenspoon SA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 19647709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. An optimized procedure for obtaining DNA from fired and unfired ammunition.
Montpetit S; O'Donnell P
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2015 Jul; 17():70-74. PubMed ID: 25828369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Touch DNA recovery from unfired and fired cartridges: Comparison of swabbing, tape lifting and soaking.
Prasad E; Hitchcock C; Raymond J; Cole A; Barash M; McNevin D; van Oorschot RAH
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Jan; 330():111101. PubMed ID: 34801815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An investigation of two methods of DNA recovery from fired and unfired 9 mm ammunition.
Moore D; Beaumont D; Brown M; Clayton T; Coleman K; Subhani Z; Thomson J
Sci Justice; 2021 Mar; 61(2):160-169. PubMed ID: 33736848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DNA transfer to firearms in alternative realistic handling scenarios.
Gosch A; Euteneuer J; Preuß-Wössner J; Courts C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Sep; 48():102355. PubMed ID: 32707471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Improvements, factors, and influences on DNA recovery from firearms.
Kaesler T; Kirkbride KP; Linacre A
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2023 Jul; 65():102873. PubMed ID: 37094516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An improved process for the collection and DNA analysis of fired cartridge cases.
Bille TW; Fahrig G; Weitz SM; Peiffer GA
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 May; 46():102238. PubMed ID: 32028222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of storage conditions and time on DNA yield from ammunition cartridges.
McElhoe J; Mandracchia T; Bille T; Holland M
Int J Legal Med; 2023 Jul; 137(4):995-1006. PubMed ID: 37237149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Advantage of ForensiX Swabs in Retrieving and Preserving Biological Fluids.
Mawlood SK; Alrowaithi M; Watson N
J Forensic Sci; 2015 May; 60(3):686-9. PubMed ID: 25684353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Touch DNA collection - Performance of four different swabs.
Comte J; Baechler S; Gervaix J; Lock E; Milon MP; Delémont O; Castella V
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2019 Nov; 43():102113. PubMed ID: 31525724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct PCR amplification of DNA from human bloodstains, saliva, and touch samples collected with microFLOQ
Ambers A; Wiley R; Novroski N; Budowle B
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2018 Jan; 32():80-87. PubMed ID: 29126000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Enhanced forensic DNA recovery with appropriate swabs and optimized swabbing technique.
Hedman J; Akel Y; Jansson L; Hedell R; Wallmark N; Forsberg C; Ansell R
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2021 Jul; 53():102491. PubMed ID: 33774569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Casework direct kit as an alternative extraction method to enhance touch DNA samples analysis.
Francisco DO; Lopez LF; Gonçalves FT; Fridman C
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jul; 47():102307. PubMed ID: 32447230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Increased recovery of touch DNA evidence using FTA paper compared to conventional collection methods.
Kirgiz IA; Calloway C
J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Apr; 47():9-15. PubMed ID: 28171796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of DNA typing success in compromised blood and touch samples based on sampling swab composition.
Smith C; Cox JO; Rhodes C; Lewis C; Koroma M; Hudson BC; Dawson Cruz T; Seashols-Williams SJ
J Forensic Sci; 2021 Jul; 66(4):1427-1434. PubMed ID: 33624316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Time since contact influences DNA profiling success of cartridges and fired cartridge casings.
Winnepenninckx A; Verhoeven E; Vermeulen S; Jeurissen B; Borgers E; Bekaert B
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Nov; 340():111474. PubMed ID: 36174383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recovery of DNA from fired and unfired cartridge casings: comparison of two DNA collection methods.
Elwick K; Gauthier Q; Rink S; Cropper E; Kavlick MF
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102726. PubMed ID: 35660851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Collaborative swab performance comparison and the impact of sampling solution volumes on DNA recovery.
Seiberle I; Währer J; Kron S; Flury K; Girardin M; Schocker A; Schulz I
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2022 Jul; 59():102716. PubMed ID: 35512614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
