These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32683917)

  • 1. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
    Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
    Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis.
    Skancke M; Schoolfield C; Umapathi B; Amdur R; Brody F; Obias V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30431390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trends in utilization, conversion rates, and outcomes for minimally invasive approaches to non-metastatic rectal cancer: a national cancer database analysis.
    Parascandola SA; Hota S; Sparks AD; Boulos S; Cavallo K; Kim G; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3154-3165. PubMed ID: 32601761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Defining the Role of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
    Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Jafari MD; Gahagan JV; Inaba CS; Koh CY; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
    Ann Surg; 2017 Oct; 266(4):574-581. PubMed ID: 28650357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of surgical approach on short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer resection in elderly patients: a national cancer database propensity score matched comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open approaches.
    Horsey ML; Parascandola SA; Sparks AD; Hota S; Ng M; Obias V
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 33638109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.
    Garfinkle R; Abou-Khalil M; Bhatnagar S; Wong-Chong N; Azoulay L; Morin N; Vasilevsky CA; Boutros M
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Feb; 23(2):348-356. PubMed ID: 30264386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery.
    Feroci F; Vannucchi A; Bianchi PP; Cantafio S; Garzi A; Formisano G; Scatizzi M
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Apr; 22(13):3602-10. PubMed ID: 27053852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Considering Value in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of Costs and Outcomes Based on the Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Approach for Proctectomy.
    Silva-Velazco J; Dietz DW; Stocchi L; Costedio M; Gorgun E; Kalady MF; Kessler H; Lavery IC; Remzi FH
    Ann Surg; 2017 May; 265(5):960-968. PubMed ID: 27232247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Outcomes in rectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic low anterior resection compared to open: a propensity-matched analysis of the NCDB (2010-2015).
    Chapman BC; Edgcomb M; Gleisner A; Vogel JD
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4754-4771. PubMed ID: 31728754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Low Anterior Resection: Equivalent Survival in a National Analysis of 14,033 Patients With Rectal Cancer.
    Sun Z; Kim J; Adam MA; Nussbaum DP; Speicher PJ; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2016 Jun; 263(6):1152-8. PubMed ID: 26501702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
    Merchea A; Ali SM; Kelley SR; Duchalais E; Alabbad JY; Dozois EJ; Larson DW
    J Gastrointest Surg; 2018 Aug; 22(8):1412-1417. PubMed ID: 29594912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of Robotic-Assisted vs Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery on Risk of Conversion to Open Laparotomy Among Patients Undergoing Resection for Rectal Cancer: The ROLARR Randomized Clinical Trial.
    Jayne D; Pigazzi A; Marshall H; Croft J; Corrigan N; Copeland J; Quirke P; West N; Rautio T; Thomassen N; Tilney H; Gudgeon M; Bianchi PP; Edlin R; Hulme C; Brown J
    JAMA; 2017 Oct; 318(16):1569-1580. PubMed ID: 29067426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
    Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Surgical resection of T4 colon cancers: an NCDB propensity score-matched analysis of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches.
    Parascandola SA; Horsey ML; Hota S; Sparks AD; Tampo MMT; Kim G; Obias V
    J Robot Surg; 2021 Oct; 15(5):701-710. PubMed ID: 33104963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National disparities in use of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer in older adults.
    Simon HL; Reif de Paula T; Spigel ZA; Keller DS
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2022 Jan; 70(1):126-135. PubMed ID: 34559891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
    Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
    Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic proctectomy after neoadjuvant therapy: safety and long-term follow-up.
    Cone MM; Lu KC; Herzig DO; Rea JD; Diggs BS; Oommen SC
    Surg Endosc; 2011 Jun; 25(6):1902-6. PubMed ID: 21184113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.