213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32683917)
21. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety.
Konstantinidis IT; Ituarte P; Woo Y; Warner SG; Melstrom K; Kim J; Singh G; Lee B; Fong Y; Melstrom LG
Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):4932-4942. PubMed ID: 31820161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
Pai A; Marecik SJ; Park JJ; Melich G; Sulo S; Prasad LM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 26200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Open versus minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer: a single-center cohort study on 237 consecutive patients.
Quero G; Rosa F; Ricci R; Fiorillo C; Giustiniani MC; Cina C; Menghi R; Doglietto GB; Alfieri S
Updates Surg; 2019 Sep; 71(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 30868546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. National disparities in minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.
Gabriel E; Thirunavukarasu P; Al-Sukhni E; Attwood K; Nurkin SJ
Surg Endosc; 2016 Mar; 30(3):1060-7. PubMed ID: 26092020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic and open surgery in rectal cancer patients in Germany: short and long-term results of a large 10-year population-based cohort.
Schnitzbauer V; Gerken M; Benz S; Völkel V; Draeger T; Fürst A; Klinkhammer-Schalke M
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1132-1141. PubMed ID: 31147825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of Early and Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes After Converted Laparoscopic Resection Compared to Primary Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer.
Allaix ME; Furnée E; Esposito L; Mistrangelo M; Rebecchi F; Arezzo A; Morino M
World J Surg; 2018 Oct; 42(10):3405-3414. PubMed ID: 29610930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy, morbidity and functional outcome of endoscopic transanal proctectomy versus laparoscopic proctectomy for low-lying rectal cancer (ETAP-GRECCAR 11 TRIAL): rationale and design.
Lelong B; de Chaisemartin C; Meillat H; Cournier S; Boher JM; Genre D; Karoui M; Tuech JJ; Delpero JR;
BMC Cancer; 2017 Apr; 17(1):253. PubMed ID: 28399840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Oncological Outcomes After Robotic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: Analysis of a Prospective Database.
Sammour T; Malakorn S; Bednarski BK; Kaur H; Shin US; Messick C; You YN; Chang GJ
Ann Surg; 2018 Mar; 267(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 27997470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Robotic versus laparoscopic rectal resection for sphincter-saving surgery: pathological and short-term outcomes in a single-center analysis of 130 consecutive patients.
Valverde A; Goasguen N; Oberlin O; Svrcek M; Fléjou JF; Sezeur A; Mosnier H; Houdart R; Lupinacci RM
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):4085-4091. PubMed ID: 28271268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of short-term and oncologic outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic resection for mid- and distal rectal cancer.
Law WL; Foo DCC
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2798-2807. PubMed ID: 27785627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The volume-outcome relationship in robotic protectectomy: does center volume matter? Results of a national cohort study.
Concors SJ; Murken DR; Hernandez PT; Mahmoud NN; Paulson EC
Surg Endosc; 2020 Oct; 34(10):4472-4480. PubMed ID: 31637603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Survival outcomes for robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus traditional laparoscopy in clinical stage I epithelial ovarian cancer.
Facer B; Wang F; Grijalva CG; Alvarez RD; Shu XO
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):474.e1-474.e12. PubMed ID: 31715149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Survival Outcomes After Surgical Management of the Primary Tumor With and Without Radiotherapy for Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database (NCDB) Analysis.
Renz P; Wegner RE; Hasan S; Brookover R; Finley G; Monga D; Raj M; McCormick J; Kirichenko A
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2019 Jun; 18(2):e237-e243. PubMed ID: 30905549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic versus laparoscopic colectomy for stage I-III colon cancer: oncologic and long-term survival outcomes.
Mirkin KA; Kulaylat AS; Hollenbeak CS; Messaris E
Surg Endosc; 2018 Jun; 32(6):2894-2901. PubMed ID: 29273877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Systematic review of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Holmer C; Kreis ME
Surg Endosc; 2018 Feb; 32(2):569-581. PubMed ID: 29218670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of surgical approach on short-term oncologic outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.
Midura EF; Hanseman DJ; Hoehn RS; Davis BR; Abbott DE; Shah SA; Paquette IM
Surgery; 2015 Aug; 158(2):453-9. PubMed ID: 25999253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
