134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32684826)
1. Effect of equilibration time on clinical and neonatal outcomes in human blastocysts vitrification.
Mitsuhata S; Hayashi M; Fujii Y; Motoyama H; Endo Y
Reprod Med Biol; 2020 Jul; 19(3):270-276. PubMed ID: 32684826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of artificial shrinkage (collapse) on the implantation potential of vitrified blastocysts.
Van Landuyt L; Polyzos NP; De Munck N; Blockeel C; Van de Velde H; Verheyen G
Hum Reprod; 2015 Nov; 30(11):2509-18. PubMed ID: 26364080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Single-embryo transfer of vitrified-warmed blastocysts yields equivalent live-birth rates and improved neonatal outcomes compared with fresh transfers.
Roy TK; Bradley CK; Bowman MC; McArthur SJ
Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1294-301. PubMed ID: 24582521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiple vitrification-warming and biopsy procedures on human embryos: clinical outcome and neonatal follow-up of children.
De Vos A; Van Landuyt L; De Rycke M; Verdyck P; Verheyen G; Buysse A; Belva F; Keymolen K; Tournaye H; Verpoest W
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2488-2496. PubMed ID: 33047114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of Multiple Vitrification-Warming Procedures and Insemination Methods on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy.
Zhang Q; Yu W; Jin C; Ni T; Zhou T; Zhao Q; Wang W; Li Y; Yan J
Reprod Sci; 2023 Jul; 30(7):2302-2312. PubMed ID: 36735146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Outcomes of blastocysts biopsied and vitrified once versus those cryopreserved twice for euploid blastocyst transfer.
Taylor TH; Patrick JL; Gitlin SA; Michael Wilson J; Crain JL; Griffin DK
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Jul; 29(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 24794643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes after long-term vitrification of blastocysts among 6,900 patients after their last live birth.
Yan Y; Zhang Q; Yang L; Zhou W; Ni T; Yan J
Fertil Steril; 2023 Jan; 119(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 36456212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of repeated vitrification of human embryos on pregnancy and neonatal outcomes.
Huang Y; Cheng Y; Zhang M; Chen Y; Zhou R; Lin D; Guo X
J Ovarian Res; 2024 Feb; 17(1):51. PubMed ID: 38402194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of equilibration time on survival and development rates of mouse pronuclear-stage embryos vitrified in solid surface (SSV) and convential straws: in vitro and in vivo evaluations.
Bagis H; Mercan HO; Cetin S; Sekmen S
Mol Reprod Dev; 2005 Dec; 72(4):494-501. PubMed ID: 16110514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vitrification of mouse embryos in two cryoprotectant solutions.
Cseh S; Horlacher W; Brem G; Corselli J; Seregi J; Solti L; Bailey L
Theriogenology; 1999 Jul; 52(1):103-13. PubMed ID: 10734409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Growth retardation in human blastocysts increases the incidence of abnormal spindles and decreases implantation potential after vitrification.
Hashimoto S; Amo A; Hama S; Ito K; Nakaoka Y; Morimoto Y
Hum Reprod; 2013 Jun; 28(6):1528-35. PubMed ID: 23482339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Spontaneously hatching human blastocyst is associated with high development potential and live birth rate in vitrified-warmed single blastocyst transfer: A retrospective cohort study.
Han EJ; Park JK; Eum JH; Bang S; Kim JW; Lee WS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jan; 164(1):315-323. PubMed ID: 37728025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Neonatal outcomes after the transfer of vitrified blastocysts: closed versus open vitrification system.
Chen Y; Zheng X; Yan J; Qiao J; Liu P
Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2013 Nov; 11():107. PubMed ID: 24256633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect on clinical and neonatal outcomes of blastocelic microsuction prior to vitrification.
Mitsuhata S; Endo Y; Hayashi M; Fujii Y; Motoyama H
Reprod Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 18(3):284-289. PubMed ID: 31312108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prediction of embryo survival and live birth rates after cryotransfers of vitrified blastocysts.
Coello A; Nohales M; Meseguer M; de Los Santos MJ; Remohà J; Cobo A
Reprod Biomed Online; 2021 May; 42(5):881-891. PubMed ID: 33785304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Does duration of cryostorage affect survival rate, pregnancy, and neonatal outcomes? Large-scale single-center study of slush nitrogen (SN
Lee HN; Park JK; Paek SK; Byun JH; Song H; Lee HJ; Chang EM; Kim JW; Lee WS; Lyu SW
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2021 Mar; 152(3):351-357. PubMed ID: 32961588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
