These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3268690)

  • 1. Implant surface characteristics and tissue interaction.
    Baier RE; Meenaghan MA; Hartman LC; Wirth JE; Flynn HE; Meyer AE; Natiella JR; Carter JM
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 13(4):594-606. PubMed ID: 3268690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Surface energy effects of implant biomaterials on the implant-tissue interface: implications for the rate, character and quality of post-surgical healing.
    Dorfman JD
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(4):661-72. PubMed ID: 3467069
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Connective tissue-dental implant interface.
    James RA
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 13(4):607-21. PubMed ID: 3268691
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The epithelium dental implant interface.
    McKinney RV; Steflik DE; Koth DL
    J Oral Implantol; 1988; 13(4):622-41. PubMed ID: 3268692
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Tissue reactions to implant materials].
    Bethmann W; Knofler W
    Zahnarztl Prax; 1987 May; 38(5):162-8. PubMed ID: 3300101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Regeneration of peri-implant infrabony defects using PerioGlas: a pilot study in rabbits.
    Johnson MW; Sullivan SM; Rohrer M; Collier M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):835-9. PubMed ID: 9425765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Pathohistological reactions of the peri-implant tissues after implant loss].
    Müller N; Kraft J
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1988 Nov; 43(11):1211-6. PubMed ID: 3251740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experimental study on the relationship between the initiation period of occlusal function and the tissue response around aluminum oxide implant.
    Takuma M; Takamori Y; Kurokawa F; Takashima F; Maruyama T
    J Osaka Univ Dent Sch; 1987 Dec; 27():101-9. PubMed ID: 3333389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Histomorphometric analysis of implant anchorage for 3 types of dental implants following 6 months of healing in baboon jaws.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2000; 15(6):785-91. PubMed ID: 11151576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implant-bone interface characteristics of bioglass dental implants.
    Weinstein AM; Klawitter JJ; Cook SD
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1980 Jan; 14(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 6987233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Endosseous implant of tricalcium phosphate ceramic].
    Zhang HD; Sun YS; Sung W
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Sep; 29(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 7743866
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A light and scanning electron microscopy study of bone healing following inferior alveolar nerve lateralization: an experimental study in rabbits.
    Yoshimoto M; König BJ; Coelho PG; Allegrini SJ; Luiz FF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 18700368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tissue integration of dental endosseous implants: description and comparative analysis of the fibro-osseous integration and osseous integration systems.
    Weiss CM
    J Oral Implantol; 1986; 12(2):169-214. PubMed ID: 3519994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Titanium implants in rabbit femur: a histologic evaluation.
    Nociti Júnior FH; Sallum AW; Sallum EA; Bozzo L
    Braz Dent J; 1997; 8(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 9590934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
    Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative histomorphometric description of implant anchorage for three types of dental implants following 3 months of healing in baboons.
    Carr AB; Gerard DA; Larsen PE
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1997; 12(6):777-84. PubMed ID: 9425758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Histological response to titanium endodontic endosseous implants in dogs.
    Parreira FR; Bramwell JD; Roahen JO; Giambarresi L
    J Endod; 1996 Apr; 22(4):161-4. PubMed ID: 8935011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone tissue interface.
    Roberts WE
    Int J Oral Implantol; 1988; 5(1):71-4. PubMed ID: 3271586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ultrastructural surface topography of the single crystal sapphire endosseous dental implant.
    McKinney RV; Steflik DE; Koth DL
    J Oral Implantol; 1984; 11(3):327-40. PubMed ID: 6596436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.