These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32688221)

  • 1. European conformation and fat scores of bovine carcasses are not good indicators of marbling.
    Liu J; Chriki S; Ellies-Oury MP; Legrand I; Pogorzelski G; Wierzbicki J; Farmer L; Troy D; Polkinghorne R; Hocquette JF
    Meat Sci; 2020 Dec; 170():108233. PubMed ID: 32688221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationships between European carcass evaluation and Meat Standards Australia grading scheme applied to young beef cattle.
    Santinello M; Penasa M; Goi A; Rampado N; Hocquette JF; De Marchi M
    Meat Sci; 2024 Oct; 216():109575. PubMed ID: 38943842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Meat Standards Australia carcass grading site affects assessment of marbling and prediction of meat-eating quality in growing European beef cattle.
    Santinello M; Rampado N; Penasa M; Hocquette JF; Pethick D; De Marchi M
    Meat Sci; 2024 Jul; 213():109501. PubMed ID: 38574653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The variation in the eating quality of beef from different sexes and breed classes cannot be completely explained by carcass measurements.
    Bonny SP; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Farmer LJ; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):987-95. PubMed ID: 26750424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Animal-level factors associated with the achievement of desirable specifications in Irish beef carcasses graded using the EUROP classification system.
    Kenny D; Murphy CP; Sleator RD; Judge MM; Evans RD; Berry DP
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jul; 98(7):. PubMed ID: 32516387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between visual marbling score and chemical intramuscular fat with camera marbling percentage in Australian beef carcasses.
    Stewart SM; Gardner GE; Williams A; Pethick DW; McGilchrist P; Kuchida K
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108369. PubMed ID: 33261986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of a genomic-enhanced sorting system for feeder cattle1.
    Akanno EC; Ekine-Dzivenu C; Chen L; Vinsky M; Abo-Ismail MK; MacNeil MD; Plastow G; Basarab J; Li C; Fitzsimmons C
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Mar; 97(3):1066-1075. PubMed ID: 30821333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Objective grading of eye muscle area, intramuscular fat and marbling in Australian beef and lamb.
    Stewart SM; Lauridsen T; Toft H; Pethick DW; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Christensen M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108358. PubMed ID: 33160745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. European conformation and fat scores have no relationship with eating quality.
    Bonny SP; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2016 Jun; 10(6):996-1006. PubMed ID: 26755183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genetic correlations between live yearling bull and steer carcass traits adjusted to different slaughter end points. 2. Carcass fat partitioning.
    Bergen R; Miller SP; Wilton JW; Mandell IB
    J Anim Sci; 2006 Mar; 84(3):558-66. PubMed ID: 16478947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. National Beef Quality Audit - 2016: Survey of carcass characteristics through instrument grading assessments.
    Boykin CA; Eastwood LC; Harris MK; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Arnold AN; Hasty JD; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Delmore RJ; Martin JN; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Pfeiffer MM; Lawrence TE; McEvers TJ; Schmidt TB; Maddock RJ; Johnson DD; Carr CC; Scheffler JM; Pringle TD; Stelzleni AM; Gottlieb J; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jul; 95(7):3003-3011. PubMed ID: 28727107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Beef Quality Audit-2016: In-plant survey of carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.
    Boykin CA; Eastwood LC; Harris MK; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Arnold AN; Hasty JD; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Delmore RJ; Martin JN; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Pfeiffer MM; Lawrence TE; McEvers TJ; Schmidt TB; Maddock RJ; Johnson DD; Carr CC; Scheffler JM; Pringle TD; Stelzleni AM; Gottlieb J; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jul; 95(7):2993-3002. PubMed ID: 28727109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of supplemental fat on growth performance and quality of beef from steers fed barley-potato product finishing diets: I. Feedlot performance, carcass traits, appearance, water binding, retail storage, and palatability attributes.
    Nelson ML; Marks DJ; Busboom JR; Cronrath JD; Falen L
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Dec; 82(12):3600-10. PubMed ID: 15537781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of United States Department of Agriculture carcass maturity on sensory attributes of steaks produced by cattle representing two dental age classes.
    Semler ML; Woerner DR; Belk KE; Enns KJ; Tatum JD
    J Anim Sci; 2016 May; 94(5):2207-17. PubMed ID: 27285716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A survey of beef carcass quality and quantity attributes in Mexico.
    Méndez RD; Meza CO; Berruecos JM; Garcés P; Delgado EJ; Rubio MS
    J Anim Sci; 2009 Nov; 87(11):3782-90. PubMed ID: 19648507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prediction of consumer palatability in beef using visual marbling scores and chemical intramuscular fat percentage.
    Stewart SM; Gardner GE; McGilchrist P; Pethick DW; Polkinghorne R; Thompson JM; Tarr G
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov; 181():108322. PubMed ID: 33067083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationships among carcass traits, auction price, and image analysis traits of marbling characteristics in Korean cattle beef.
    Beak SH; Park SJ; Fassah DM; Kim HJ; Kim M; Jo C; Baik M
    Meat Sci; 2021 Jan; 171():108268. PubMed ID: 32745870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of marbling fleck characteristics between beef marbling grades and its effect on sensory quality characteristics in high-marbled Hanwoo steer.
    Lee B; Yoon S; Choi YM
    Meat Sci; 2019 Jun; 152():109-115. PubMed ID: 30844620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of growth stage on carcass composition and factors associated with marbling development in beef cattle.
    Kern SA; Pritchard RH; Blair AD; Scramlin SM; Underwood KR
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Nov; 92(11):5275-84. PubMed ID: 25253804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use of expected progeny differences for marbling in beef: II. Carcass and palatability traits.
    Gwartney BL; Calkins CR; Rasby RJ; Stock RA; Vieselmeyer BA; Gosey JA
    J Anim Sci; 1996 May; 74(5):1014-22. PubMed ID: 8726733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.