207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32688853)
1. Preliminary use of ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography to study tree roots in pine forests and poplar plantations.
Zenone T; Morelli G; Teobaldelli M; Fischanger F; Matteucci M; Sordini M; Armani A; Ferrè C; Chiti T; Seufert G
Funct Plant Biol; 2008 Dec; 35(10):1047-1058. PubMed ID: 32688853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of ground-penetrating radar to study tree roots in the southeastern United States.
Butnor JR; Doolittle JA; Kress L; Cohen S; Johnsen KH
Tree Physiol; 2001 Nov; 21(17):1269-78. PubMed ID: 11696414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Detection of tree roots and determination of root diameters by ground penetrating radar under optimal conditions.
Barton CV; Montagu KD
Tree Physiol; 2004 Dec; 24(12):1323-31. PubMed ID: 15465695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mapping tree root systems with ground-penetrating radar.
Hruska J; Cermák J; Sustek S
Tree Physiol; 1999 Feb; 19(2):125-130. PubMed ID: 12651592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated low-cost terrestrial laser scanner for measuring diameters at breast height and heights of plantation trees.
Wang P; Li R; Bu G; Zhao R
PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209888. PubMed ID: 30653532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Coarse root spatial distribution determined using a ground-penetrating radar technique in a subtropical evergreen broad-leaved forest, China.
Yan H; Dong X; Feng G; Zhang S; Mucciardi A
Sci China Life Sci; 2013 Nov; 56(11):1038-46. PubMed ID: 24203453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Root distribution of Pinus pinaster, P. radiata, Eucalyptus globulus and E. kochii and associated soil chemistry in agricultural land adjacent to tree lines.
Sudmeyer RA; Speijers J; Nicholas BD
Tree Physiol; 2004 Dec; 24(12):1333-46. PubMed ID: 15465696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Background clutter amplitude and frequency of GPR signals to analyse water content in sedimentary deposits: Urban infrastructure environment.
Rasol M; Pérez-Gracia V; Assunção SS; González-Drigo R; Clapes J; Sossa VA; Schmidt F
Environ Res; 2022 Sep; 212(Pt A):113189. PubMed ID: 35390298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Geophysical monitoring of simulated clandestine graves using electrical and ground-penetrating radar methods: 0-3 years after burial.
Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Hansen JD; Jones GM; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
J Forensic Sci; 2012 Nov; 57(6):1467-86. PubMed ID: 22509973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Soil organic carbon accumulation and several physicochemical soil properties under stone pine and maritime pine plantations in coastal dune, Durusu-Istanbul.
Abdalmoula MM; Makineci E; Özturna AG; Pehlivan S; Şahin A; Tolunay D
Environ Monit Assess; 2019 Apr; 191(5):312. PubMed ID: 31030271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mapping of Agricultural Subsurface Drainage Systems Using a Frequency-Domain Ground Penetrating Radar and Evaluating Its Performance Using a Single-Frequency Multi-Receiver Electromagnetic Induction Instrument.
Koganti T; Van De Vijver E; Allred BJ; Greve MH; Ringgaard J; Iversen BV
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Jul; 20(14):. PubMed ID: 32674514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of soil physical properties of reclaimed land in open-pit mining area: feasibility of application of ground penetrating radar.
Luo G; Cao Y; Xu H; Yang G; Wang S; Huang Y; Bai Z
Environ Monit Assess; 2021 Jun; 193(7):392. PubMed ID: 34101032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) responses for sub-surface salt contamination and solid waste: modeling and controlled lysimeter studies.
Wijewardana YN; Shilpadi AT; Mowjood MI; Kawamoto K; Galagedara LW
Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Feb; 189(2):57. PubMed ID: 28091883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of Data Processing and Antenna Frequency on Spatial Structure Modelling of GPR Data.
De Benedetto D; Quarto R; Castrignanò A; Palumbo DA
Sensors (Basel); 2015 Jul; 15(7):16430-47. PubMed ID: 26184190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The forensic geophysical controlled research site of the University of Brasilia, Brazil: Results from methods GPR and electrical resistivity tomography.
Cavalcanti MM; Rocha MP; Blum MLB; Borges WR
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Dec; 293():101.e1-101.e21. PubMed ID: 30384988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monitoring the evolution and migration of a methane gas plume in an unconfined sandy aquifer using time-lapse GPR and ERT.
Steelman CM; Klazinga DR; Cahill AG; Endres AL; Parker BL
J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Oct; 205():12-24. PubMed ID: 28865808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. In situ detection of tree root distribution and biomass by multi-electrode resistivity imaging.
Amato M; Basso B; Celano G; Bitella G; Morelli G; Rossi R
Tree Physiol; 2008 Oct; 28(10):1441-8. PubMed ID: 18708325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term Geophysical Monitoring of Simulated Clandestine Graves using Electrical and Ground Penetrating Radar Methods: 4-6 Years After Burial.
Pringle JK; Jervis JR; Roberts D; Dick HC; Wisniewski KD; Cassidy NJ; Cassella JP
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Mar; 61(2):309-321. PubMed ID: 27404604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigating the Performance of Bi-Static GPR Antennas for Near-Surface Object Detection.
Gao X; Podd FJW; van Verre W; Daniels DJ; Peyton AJ
Sensors (Basel); 2019 Jan; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 30621267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH.
Gülci S; Yurtseven H; Akay AO; Akgul M
Environ Monit Assess; 2023 May; 195(6):678. PubMed ID: 37191833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
