These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32691215)

  • 1. Impella in cardiogenic shock following acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Vargas KG; Jäger B; Kaufmann CC; Biagioli A; Watremez S; Gatto F; Özbek C; Razouk A; Geppert A; Huber K
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2020 Dec; 132(23-24):716-725. PubMed ID: 32691215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Left Ventricular Unloading Before Percutaneous Coronary Intervention is Associated With Improved Survival in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Miyashita S; Banlengchit R; Marbach JA; Chweich H; Kawabori M; Kimmelstiel CD; Kapur NK
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jun; 39():28-35. PubMed ID: 34824038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic literature review].
    Negro A; Pecoraro V; Camerlingo MD; Maltoni S
    G Ital Cardiol (Rome); 2020 Feb; 21(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 32051636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Timing of impella placement in PCI for acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: An updated meta-analysis.
    Iannaccone M; Franchin L; Hanson ID; Boccuzzi G; Basir MB; Truesdell AG; O'Neill W
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Sep; 362():47-54. PubMed ID: 35533755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Timing of mechanical circulatory support during primary angioplasty in acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Archilletti F; Giuliani L; Dangas GD; Ricci F; Benedetto U; Radico F; Gallina S; Rossi S; Maddestra N; Zimarino M
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2022 Mar; 99(4):998-1005. PubMed ID: 35182020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Timing of Impella implantation and outcomes in cardiogenic shock or high-risk percutaneous coronary revascularization.
    Tarantini G; Masiero G; Burzotta F; Pazzanese V; Briguori C; Trani C; Piva T; De Marco F; Di Biasi M; Pagnotta P; Mojoli M; Casu G; Giustino G; Lorenzoni G; Montorfano M; Ancona MB; Pappalardo F; Chieffo A;
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Aug; 98(2):E222-E234. PubMed ID: 33793051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Gender disparities with the use of percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention complicated by cardiogenic shock: From pVAD Working Group.
    Doshi R; Patel K; Decter D; Jauhar R; Meraj P
    Indian Heart J; 2018 Jul; 70 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S90-S95. PubMed ID: 30122245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Safety and efficacy of mechanical circulatory support with Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump for high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention and/or cardiogenic shock: Insights from a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.
    Kuno T; Takagi H; Ando T; Kodaira M; Numasawa Y; Fox J; Bangalore S
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2021 Apr; 97(5):E636-E645. PubMed ID: 32894797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contemporary trends in use of mechanical circulatory support in patients with acute MI and cardiogenic shock.
    Helgestad OKL; Josiassen J; Hassager C; Jensen LO; Holmvang L; Udesen NLJ; Schmidt H; Berg Ravn H; Moller JE
    Open Heart; 2020; 7(1):e001214. PubMed ID: 32201591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impella Support Versus Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis.
    Moustafa A; Khan MS; Saad M; Siddiqui S; Eltahawy E
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Jan; 34():25-31. PubMed ID: 33549497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mechanical circulatory support with Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump or medical treatment in cardiogenic shock-a critical appraisal of current data.
    Wernly B; Seelmaier C; Leistner D; Stähli BE; Pretsch I; Lichtenauer M; Jung C; Hoppe UC; Landmesser U; Thiele H; Lauten A
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2019 Nov; 108(11):1249-1257. PubMed ID: 30900010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock from acute myocardial infarction: Impella CP/5.0 versus ECMO.
    Karami M; den Uil CA; Ouweneel DM; Scholte NT; Engström AE; Akin S; Lagrand WK; Vlaar AP; Jewbali LS; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):164-172. PubMed ID: 31353918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Early Impella Support in Postcardiac Arrest Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Acute Myocardial Infarction Improves Short- and Long-Term Survival.
    Chatzis G; Markus B; Luesebrink U; Ahrens H; Divchev D; Syntila S; Scheele N; Al Eryani H; Tousoulis D; Schieffer B; Karatolios K
    Crit Care Med; 2021 Jun; 49(6):943-955. PubMed ID: 33729726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of different mechanical circulatory support devices and their timing of implantation on myocardial damage and mid-term recovery in acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock.
    Pieri M; Sorrentino T; Oppizzi M; Melisurgo G; Lembo R; Colombo A; Zangrillo A; Pappalardo F
    J Interv Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 31(6):717-724. PubMed ID: 30460719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impella 2.5 initiated prior to unprotected left main PCI in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock improves early survival.
    Meraj PM; Doshi R; Schreiber T; Maini B; O'Neill WW
    J Interv Cardiol; 2017 Jun; 30(3):256-263. PubMed ID: 28419573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Percutaneous coronary intervention with Impella support with and without intra-aortic balloon in cardiogenic shock patients.
    Bhuiyan R; Bimal T; Fishbein J; Gandotra P; Selim S; Ong L; Gruberg L
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Oct; 55():68-73. PubMed ID: 37076412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Long term survival after early unloading with Impella CP
    Loehn T; O'Neill WW; Lange B; Pfluecke C; Schweigler T; Mierke J; Waessnig N; Mahlmann A; Youssef A; Speiser U; Strasser RH; Ibrahim K
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2020 Mar; 9(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 30456984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices: A Health Technology Assessment.
    Health Quality Ontario
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2017; 17(2):1-97. PubMed ID: 28232854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Real-life use of left ventricular circulatory support with Impella in cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction: 12 years AMC experience.
    Ouweneel DM; de Brabander J; Karami M; Sjauw KD; Engström AE; Vis MM; Wykrzykowska JJ; Beijk MA; Koch KT; Baan J; de Winter RJ; Piek JJ; Lagrand WK; Cherpanath TG; Driessen AH; Cocchieri R; de Mol BA; Tijssen JG; Henriques JP
    Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care; 2019 Jun; 8(4):338-349. PubMed ID: 30403366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Outcomes of Hemodynamic Support With Impella for Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock at a Rural Community Hospital Without On-Site Surgical Back-up.
    Wilkins CE; Herrera TL; Nagahiro MK; Weathers LB; Girotra SV; Sandhu F
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Feb; 31(2):E23-E29. PubMed ID: 30700627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.