These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32691350)

  • 21. Current training on the basics of robotic surgery in the Netherlands: Time for a multidisciplinary approach?
    Brinkman W; de Angst I; Schreuder H; Schout B; Draaisma W; Verweij L; Hendrikx A; van der Poel H
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):281-287. PubMed ID: 27194262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Scratch to state-of-the-art: setting up a new robotic facility in a developing country.
    Bora GS; Mavuduru RS; Devana SK; Singh SK; Mandal AK
    J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):193-195. PubMed ID: 27334772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review.
    Bric JD; Lumbard DC; Frelich MJ; Gould JC
    Surg Endosc; 2016 Jun; 30(6):2169-78. PubMed ID: 26304107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The Role of the Robotics Coordinator: Improving Efficiency in a Robotic Surgery Program.
    Lawrence C
    AORN J; 2022 Mar; 115(3):239-249. PubMed ID: 35213048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Achieving robotic program best practice performance and cost versus laparoscopy: Two case studies define a framework for optimization.
    Feldstein J; Coussons H
    Int J Med Robot; 2020 Jun; 16(3):e2098. PubMed ID: 32096901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Artificial intelligence and robotics: a combination that is changing the operating room.
    Andras I; Mazzone E; van Leeuwen FWB; De Naeyer G; van Oosterom MN; Beato S; Buckle T; O'Sullivan S; van Leeuwen PJ; Beulens A; Crisan N; D'Hondt F; Schatteman P; van Der Poel H; Dell'Oglio P; Mottrie A
    World J Urol; 2020 Oct; 38(10):2359-2366. PubMed ID: 31776737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Developing a successful robotics program.
    Luthringer T; Aleksic I; Caire A; Albala DM
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jan; 22(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 22037321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. 30 Years of Robotic Surgery.
    Leal Ghezzi T; Campos Corleta O
    World J Surg; 2016 Oct; 40(10):2550-7. PubMed ID: 27177648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effectiveness of a dedicated robot-assisted surgery training program.
    Attalla K; Raza SJ; Rehman S; Din R; Stegemann A; Field E; Curti L; Sexton S; Bienko M; Bhandari M; Guru KA
    Can J Urol; 2013 Dec; 20(6):7084-90. PubMed ID: 24331355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparative analysis and guide to virtual reality robotic surgical simulators.
    Julian D; Tanaka A; Mattingly P; Truong M; Perez M; Smith R
    Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 29125206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Developing an intelligent tutoring system for robotic-assisted surgery instruction.
    Julian D; Smith R
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Dec; 15(6):e2037. PubMed ID: 31509636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Developing a successful robotic surgery program in a rural hospital.
    Zender J; Thell C
    AORN J; 2010 Jul; 92(1):72-83; quiz 84-6. PubMed ID: 20619774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Residency training in robotic surgery: The role of simulation.
    Bresler L; Perez M; Hubert J; Henry JP; Perrenot C
    J Visc Surg; 2020 Jun; 157(3 Suppl 2):S123-S129. PubMed ID: 32299771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does Robotic Surgical Simulator Performance Correlate With Surgical Skill?
    Mills JT; Hougen HY; Bitner D; Krupski TL; Schenkman NS
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(6):1052-1056. PubMed ID: 28623113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Establishing a robotic colorectal surgery programme.
    Bell S; Carne P; Chin M; Farmer C
    ANZ J Surg; 2015 Apr; 85(4):214-6. PubMed ID: 25142978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.
    Peters BS; Armijo PR; Krause C; Choudhury SA; Oleynikov D
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Apr; 32(4):1636-1655. PubMed ID: 29442240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Developing a robotic colorectal cancer surgery program: understanding institutional and individual learning curves.
    Guend H; Widmar M; Patel S; Nash GM; Paty PB; Guillem JG; Temple LK; Garcia-Aguilar J; Weiser MR
    Surg Endosc; 2017 Jul; 31(7):2820-2828. PubMed ID: 27815742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Trends in Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy and Distal Pancreatectomy.
    Caba Molina D; Lambreton F; Arrangoiz Majul R
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):147-151. PubMed ID: 30222522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Combining of ETHOS Operating Ergonomic Platform, Three-dimensional Laparoscopic Camera, and Radius Surgical System Manipulators Improves Ergonomy in Urologic Laparoscopy: Comparison with Conventional Laparoscopy and da Vinci in a Pelvi Trainer.
    Tokas T; Gözen AS; Avgeris M; Tschada A; Fiedler M; Klein J; Rassweiler J
    Eur Urol Focus; 2017 Oct; 3(4-5):413-420. PubMed ID: 28753821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Outcomes of a virtual-reality simulator-training programme on basic surgical skills in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
    Phé V; Cattarino S; Parra J; Bitker MO; Ambrogi V; Vaessen C; Rouprêt M
    Int J Med Robot; 2017 Jun; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 26928974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.