These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32691353)

  • 1. The use of robotic or laparoscopic stapler in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Tejedor P; Sagias F; Flashman K; Kandala NL; Khan J
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Dec; 14(6):829-833. PubMed ID: 32691353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Advantages of using a robotic stapler in rectal cancer surgery.
    Tejedor P; Sagias F; Nock D; Flashman K; Naqvi S; Kandala NL; Khan JS
    J Robot Surg; 2020 Apr; 14(2):365-370. PubMed ID: 31290074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison between the da Vinci Xi EndoWrist Stapler and a conventional laparoscopic stapler in rectal transection: A randomized controlled trial.
    Teo NZ; Ngu JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2023 Jun; 19(3):e2501. PubMed ID: 36692195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of the number of stapler firings on anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic rectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Balciscueta Z; Uribe N; Caubet L; López M; Torrijo I; Tabet J; Martín MC
    Tech Coloproctol; 2020 Sep; 24(9):919-925. PubMed ID: 32451807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The severity of postoperative complications after robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Wang Y; Liu Y; Han G; Yi B; Zhu S
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0239909. PubMed ID: 33002066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Control Comparison of the New EndoWrist and Traditional Laparoscopic Staplers for Anterior Rectal Resection with the Da Vinci Xi: A Case Study.
    Guadagni S; Di Franco G; Gianardi D; Palmeri M; Ceccarelli C; Bianchini M; Furbetta N; Caprili G; D'Isidoro C; Moglia A; Melfi F; Buccianti P; Mosca F; Morelli L
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Dec; 28(12):1422-1427. PubMed ID: 29920142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Huang YJ; Kang YN; Huang YM; Wu AT; Wang W; Wei PL
    Asian J Surg; 2019 Jun; 42(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 30609955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancers.
    Slim K; Tilmans G; Occéan BV; Dziri C; Pereira B; Canis M
    J Visc Surg; 2024 Apr; 161(2):76-89. PubMed ID: 38355331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Efficacy of a robotic stapler on symptomatic anastomotic leakage in robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
    Chen K; Shiomi A; Kagawa H; Hino H; Manabe S; Yamaoka Y; Kato S; Hanaoka M; Saito K; Maeda C; Kojima T; Shioi I; Nanishi K; Tanaka Y; Kasai S
    Surg Today; 2022 Jan; 52(1):120-128. PubMed ID: 34110488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Stapler Use for Rectal Transection in Robotic Surgery for Cancer.
    Atasoy D; Aytac E; Ozben V; Bayraktar O; Erenler Bayraktar I; Aghayeva A; Baca B; Hamzaoglu I; Karahasanoglu T
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 May; 28(5):501-505. PubMed ID: 29360006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. TME for rectal cancer: consecutive 70 patients treated with laparoscopic and robotic technique-cumulative experience in a single centre.
    Mégevand JL; Lillo E; Amboldi M; Lenisa L; Ambrosi A; Rusconi A
    Updates Surg; 2019 Jun; 71(2):331-338. PubMed ID: 31028665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Functional outcomes and quality of life following open versus laparoscopic versus robot-assisted versus transanal total mesorectal excision in rectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Geitenbeek RTJ; Burghgraef TA; Moes CA; Hompes R; Ranchor AV; Consten ECJ;
    Surg Endosc; 2024 Aug; 38(8):4431-4444. PubMed ID: 38898341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
    Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Systematic Review and Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis: Short-Term and Long-Term Outcomes of Three Surgery Procedures Following Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer.
    Wang L; Zhang Z; Gong L; Zhan Y; Li M; Li S; Xiao Y
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 May; 29(5):663-670. PubMed ID: 30648922
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Use of Robotic and Laparoscopic Surgical Stapling Devices During Minimally Invasive Colon and Rectal Surgery: A Comparison.
    Holzmacher JL; Luka S; Aziz M; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Feb; 27(2):151-155. PubMed ID: 27893300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic low anterior resection with DST anastomosis.
    Kawada K; Hasegawa S; Hida K; Hirai K; Okoshi K; Nomura A; Kawamura J; Nagayama S; Sakai Y
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Oct; 28(10):2988-95. PubMed ID: 24853855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and perioperative outcomes compared with laparoscopic total mesorectal excision.
    Ma B; Gao P; Song Y; Zhang C; Zhang C; Wang L; Liu H; Wang Z
    BMC Cancer; 2016 Jul; 16():380. PubMed ID: 27377924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An international multicentre prospective audit of elective rectal cancer surgery; operative approach versus outcome, including transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME).
    2017 European Society of Coloproctology (ESCP) collaborating group
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 Sep; 20 Suppl 6():33-46. PubMed ID: 30255642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with lateral lymph node dissection for advanced rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Chaouch MA; Hussain MI; Carneiro da Costa A; Mazzotta A; Krimi B; Gouader A; Cotte E; Khan J; Oweira H
    PLoS One; 2024; 19(5):e0304031. PubMed ID: 38809911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kowalewski KF; Seifert L; Ali S; Schmidt MW; Seide S; Haney C; Tapking C; Shamiyeh A; Kulu Y; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 32025924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.