These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32692261)
1. The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire: Operating characteristics in non-pain forensic samples. Henry GK; Gornbein J Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022; 29(4):598-604. PubMed ID: 32692261 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Examination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) in a large sample of credible and noncredible patients referred for neuropsychological testing. Balasanyan M; Boone KB; Ermshar A; Miora D; Cottingham M; Victor TL; Ziegler E; Zeller MA; Wright M Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):165-182. PubMed ID: 28585455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Can brief measures effectively screen for pain and somatic malingering? Examination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and Pain Disability Index. Crighton AH; Wygant DB; Applegate KC; Umlauf RL; Granacher RP Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2042-50. PubMed ID: 24768750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Pain Disability Index: Effects of performance and symptom validity in mild traumatic brain injury litigants with persistent Post-Concussion pain complaints. Henry GK Clin Neuropsychol; 2023 Feb; 37(2):448-458. PubMed ID: 35109767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Posttraumatic stress disorder and noncredible symptom reporting on the Trauma Symptom Inventory-2. Henry GK; Gornbein J Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022; 29(1):100-105. PubMed ID: 31923365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and Pain Disability Index in the detection of malingered pain-related disability in chronic pain. Bianchini KJ; Aguerrevere LE; Guise BJ; Ord JS; Etherton JL; Meyers JE; Soignier RD; Greve KW; Curtis KL; Bui J Clin Neuropsychol; 2014; 28(8):1376-94. PubMed ID: 25517267 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans. Bailey KC; Soble JR; O'Rourke JJF Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Jan; 32(1):119-131. PubMed ID: 28555516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the Word Memory Test and the Test of Memory Malingering in detecting invalid performance in neuropsychological testing. Bhowmick C; Hirst R; Green P Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(4):486-496. PubMed ID: 31519112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance on the Test of Memory Malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit. Grabyan JM; Collins RL; Alverson WA; Chen DK Clin Neuropsychol; 2018 Apr; 32(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 28826306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Not all performance validity tests are created equal: The role of recollection and familiarity in the Test of Memory Malingering and Word Memory Test. Eglit GM; Lynch JK; McCaffrey RJ J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2017 Mar; 39(2):173-189. PubMed ID: 27501116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relationship between the modified somatic perception questionnaire and dynamic platform posturography. Brasseux R; Greve KW; Gianoli GJ; Soileau JS; Bianchini KJ Otol Neurotol; 2008 Apr; 29(3):359-62. PubMed ID: 18165790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Utility of an attention-based performance validity test for the detection of feigned cognitive dysfunction after acquired brain injury. Fuermaier ABM; Tucha O; Russ D; Ehrenstein JK; Stanke M; Heindorf R; Buggenthin R; Aschenbrenner S; Koerts J; Tucha L J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Apr; 42(3):285-297. PubMed ID: 32041477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Response time measures on the Word Memory Test do not add incremental validity to accuracy scores in predicting noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury litigants. Henry GK Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2022 Sep; ():1-7. PubMed ID: 36170848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Impact of criterion measures on the classification accuracy of TOMM-1. Rai JK; Erdodi LA Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2021; 28(2):185-196. PubMed ID: 31187632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A review of performance and symptom validity testing with pediatric populations. Kirk JW; Baker DA; Kirk JJ; MacAllister WS Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2020; 9(4):292-306. PubMed ID: 32372667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Stratified performance on the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) is associated with differential responding on the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI). Whiteside DM; Hunt I; Choate A; Caraher K; Basso MR J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2020 Mar; 42(2):131-141. PubMed ID: 31771455 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. Tan JE; Slick DJ; Strauss E; Hultsch DF Clin Neuropsychol; 2002 Dec; 16(4):495-505. PubMed ID: 12822058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating constructs represented by symptom validity tests in forensic neuropsychological assessment of traumatic brain injury. Frederick RI; Bowden SC J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(2):105-22. PubMed ID: 19333066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]