These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32693095)
1. Intrapartum ultrasound during rotational forceps delivery: a novel tool for safety, quality control, and teaching. Hinkson L; Henrich W; Tutschek B Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 224(1):93.e1-93.e7. PubMed ID: 32693095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with pregnancies delivering by non-rotational forceps. Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Ahmed H; Akolekar R J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Apr; 42(3):379-384. PubMed ID: 34030603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Kielland's forceps: does it increase the risk of anal sphincter injuries? An observational study. Gauthaman N; Henry D; Ster IC; Khunda A; Doumouchtsis SK Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Oct; 26(10):1525-32. PubMed ID: 25990206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maternal and neonatal complications following Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Giacchino T; Karkia R; Ahmed H; Akolekar R BJOG; 2023 Jul; 130(8):856-864. PubMed ID: 36694989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kielland's rotational forceps delivery: A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes with rotational ventouse or second stage caesarean section deliveries. Giacchino T; Karkia R; Zhang W; Beta J; Ahmed H; Akolekar R Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2020 Nov; 254():175-180. PubMed ID: 32987337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A simple model to predict the complicated operative vaginal deliveries using vacuum or forceps. Sainz JA; García-Mejido JA; Aquise A; Borrero C; Bonomi MJ; Fernández-Palacín A Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Feb; 220(2):193.e1-193.e12. PubMed ID: 30391443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kielland's forceps. From controversy to consensus? Nash Z; Nathan B; Mascarenhas L Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Jan; 94(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 25233861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Kielland's forceps delivery: is it a dying art? Tan KH; Sim R; Yam KL Singapore Med J; 1992 Aug; 33(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 1411670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Rotational vaginal delivery with Kielland's forceps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and safety outcomes. Al Wattar BH; Al Wattar B; Gallos I; Pirie AM Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Dec; 27(6):438-44. PubMed ID: 26485456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Babies in occiput posterior position are significantly more likely to require an emergency cesarean birth compared with babies in occiput transverse position in the second stage of labor: A prospective observational study. Tempest N; Lane S; Hapangama D; Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Apr; 99(4):537-545. PubMed ID: 31667835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rotational delivery of the fetus: Kielland's forceps and two other methods compared. Healy DL; Quinn MA; Pepperell RJ Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1982 Jul; 89(7):501-6. PubMed ID: 7093162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fetal descent in nulliparous women assessed by ultrasound: a longitudinal study. Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 224(4):378.e1-378.e15. PubMed ID: 33039395 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of rotation on perineal lacerations in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Bradley MS; Kaminski RJ; Streitman DC; Dunn SL; Krans EE Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jul; 122(1):132-137. PubMed ID: 23743462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to the instrument used for mid-cavity rotational operative vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study. Bahl R; Van de Venne M; Macleod M; Strachan B; Murphy DJ BJOG; 2013 Nov; 120(12):1526-32. PubMed ID: 23924292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use and safety of Kielland's forceps in current obstetric practice. Burke N; Field K; Mujahid F; Morrison JJ Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Oct; 120(4):766-70. PubMed ID: 22996093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound. Dall'Asta A; Angeli L; Masturzo B; Volpe N; Schera GBL; Di Pasquo E; Girlando F; Attini R; Menato G; Frusca T; Ghi T Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):642.e1-642.e13. PubMed ID: 31589867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prophylactic manual rotation of occiput posterior and transverse positions to decrease operative delivery: the PROPOP randomized clinical trial. Blanc J; Castel P; Mauviel F; Baumstarck K; Bretelle F; D'Ercole C; Haumonte JB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):444.e1-444.e8. PubMed ID: 34033811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new course on assisted rotational birth and complex caesarean section - Mixed methods evaluation of Art & Craft. Jaufuraully S; Parris D; Opie J; Siassakos D Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2024 May; 296():126-130. PubMed ID: 38432018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of occiput posterior fetal head position on the risk of anal sphincter injury in forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Benavides L; Wu JM; Hundley AF; Ivester TS; Visco AG Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1702-6. PubMed ID: 15902181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. When does fetal head rotation occur in spontaneous labor at term: results of an ultrasound-based longitudinal study in nulliparous women. Hjartardóttir H; Lund SH; Benediktsdóttir S; Geirsson RT; Eggebø TM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 May; 224(5):514.e1-514.e9. PubMed ID: 33207231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]