115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32693400)
21. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Physical performance of the new hybrid PET∕CT Discovery-690.
Bettinardi V; Presotto L; Rapisarda E; Picchio M; Gianolli L; Gilardi MC
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5394-411. PubMed ID: 21992359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of two commercial whole body PET systems based on LSO and BGO crystals respectively for brain imaging.
Trébossen R; Comtat C; Brulon V; Bailly P; Meyer ME
Med Phys; 2009 Apr; 36(4):1399-409. PubMed ID: 19472647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Image-quality assessment for several positron emitters using the NEMA NU 4-2008 standards in the Siemens Inveon small-animal PET scanner.
Disselhorst JA; Brom M; Laverman P; Slump CH; Boerman OC; Oyen WJ; Gotthardt M; Visser EP
J Nucl Med; 2010 Apr; 51(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 20237025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Performance evaluation of small-animal multipinhole μSPECT scanners for mouse imaging.
Deleye S; Van Holen R; Verhaeghe J; Vandenberghe S; Stroobants S; Staelens S
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 May; 40(5):744-58. PubMed ID: 23344137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A quality assurance framework for the fully automated and objective evaluation of image quality in cone-beam computed tomography.
Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031901. PubMed ID: 24593719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Fast 3D-EM reconstruction using Planograms for stationary planar positron emission mammography camera.
Motta A; Guerra AD; Belcari N; Moehrs S; Panetta D; Righi S; Valentini D
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2005 Dec; 29(8):587-96. PubMed ID: 16290284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Newly-Developed Positron Emission Mammography (PEM) Device for the Detection of Small Breast Cancer.
Yanai A; Itoh M; Hirakawa H; Yanai K; Tashiro M; Harada R; Yoshikawa A; Yamamoto S; Ohuchi N; Ishida T
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2018 May; 245(1):13-19. PubMed ID: 29731479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A dedicated breast-PET/CT scanner: Evaluation of basic performance characteristics.
Raylman RR; Van Kampen W; Stolin AV; Gong W; Jaliparthi G; Martone PF; Smith MF; Sarment D; Clinthorne NH; Perna M
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 29389017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preliminary results for positron emission mammography: real-time functional breast imaging in a conventional mammography gantry.
Weinberg I; Majewski S; Weisenberger A; Markowitz A; Aloj L; Majewski L; Danforth D; Mulshine J; Cowan K; Zujewski J; Chow C; Jones E; Chang V; Berg W; Frank J
Eur J Nucl Med; 1996 Jul; 23(7):804-6. PubMed ID: 8662120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance Evaluation of a New Dedicated Breast PET Scanner Using NEMA NU4-2008 Standards.
Miyake KK; Matsumoto K; Inoue M; Nakamoto Y; Kanao S; Oishi T; Kawase S; Kitamura K; Yamakawa Y; Akazawa A; Kobayashi T; Ohi J; Togashi K
J Nucl Med; 2014 Jul; 55(7):1198-203. PubMed ID: 24812244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Beyond 18F-FDG: Characterization of PET/CT and PET/MR Scanners for a Comprehensive Set of Positron Emitters of Growing Application--18F, 11C, 89Zr, 124I, 68Ga, and 90Y.
Soderlund AT; Chaal J; Tjio G; Totman JJ; Conti M; Townsend DW
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1285-91. PubMed ID: 26135111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Performance evaluation of the MOLECUBES β-CUBE-a high spatial resolution and high sensitivity small animal PET scanner utilizing monolithic LYSO scintillation detectors.
Krishnamoorthy S; Blankemeyer E; Mollet P; Surti S; Van Holen R; Karp JS
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 63(15):155013. PubMed ID: 29938684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A quantitative metrology for performance characterization of five breast tomosynthesis systems based on an anthropomorphic phantom.
Ikejimba L; Lo JY; Chen Y; Oberhofer N; Kiarashi N; Samei E
Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1627. PubMed ID: 27036562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Image quality analysis of
Rosar F; Buchholz HG; Michels S; Hoffmann MA; Piel M; Waldmann CM; Rösch F; Reuss S; Schreckenberger M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Mar; 7(1):16. PubMed ID: 32166581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Time-of-Flight Information Improved the Detectability of Subcentimeter Spheres Using a Clinical PET/CT Scanner.
Hashimoto N; Morita K; Tsutsui Y; Himuro K; Baba S; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med Technol; 2018 Sep; 46(3):268-273. PubMed ID: 29599404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Validation of phantom-based harmonization for patient harmonization.
Panetta JV; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Karp JS
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3534-3544. PubMed ID: 28464372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation of fully 3-D emission mammotomography with a compact cadmium zinc telluride detector.
Brzymialkiewicz CN; Tornai MP; McKinley RL; Bowsher JE
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Jul; 24(7):868-77. PubMed ID: 16011316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Positron emission mammographic instrument: initial results.
Murthy K; Aznar M; Bergman AM; Thompson CJ; Robar JL; Lisbona R; Loutfi A; Gagnon JH
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):280-5. PubMed ID: 10751499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Performance Characteristics of the Whole-Body Discovery IQ PET/CT System.
Reynés-Llompart G; Gámez-Cenzano C; Romero-Zayas I; Rodríguez-Bel L; Vercher-Conejero JL; Martí-Climent JM
J Nucl Med; 2017 Jul; 58(7):1155-1161. PubMed ID: 28302761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
