These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32693451)

  • 1. Infants' Processing of Featural and Configural Information in the Upper and Lower Halves of the Face.
    Quinn PC; Tanaka JW
    Infancy; 2009 Jul; 14(4):474-487. PubMed ID: 32693451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Featural and configural face processing in adults and infants: a behavioral and electrophysiological investigation.
    Scott LS
    Perception; 2006; 35(8):1107-28. PubMed ID: 17076069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Are Faces Special to Infants? An Investigation of Configural and Featural Processing for the Upper and Lower Regions of Houses in 3- to 7-month-olds.
    Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Lee K; Pascalis O; Slater AM
    Vis cogn; 2013 Jan; 21(1):23-37. PubMed ID: 24093003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Perceptual separability of featural and configural information in congenital prosopagnosia.
    Kimchi R; Behrmann M; Avidan G; Amishav R
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2012; 29(5-6):447-63. PubMed ID: 23428081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An other-race effect for configural and featural processing of faces: upper and lower face regions play different roles.
    Wang Z; Quinn PC; Tanaka JW; Yu X; Sun YH; Liu J; Pascalis O; Ge L; Lee K
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():559. PubMed ID: 26005427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An investigation on the face inversion effect in deaf children.
    Zhang Y; He H; Yi L
    J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ; 2024 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 39153471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of information type (features vs. configuration) and location (eyes vs. mouth) on the development of face perception.
    Tanaka JW; Quinn PC; Xu B; Maynard K; Huxtable N; Lee K; Pascalis O
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Aug; 124():36-49. PubMed ID: 24747157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Configural face processing develops more slowly than featural face processing.
    Mondloch CJ; Le Grand R; Maurer D
    Perception; 2002; 31(5):553-66. PubMed ID: 12044096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N; Jovanovic B
    Dev Sci; 2007 Jul; 10(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 17552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.
    Wang H; Guo S; Fu S
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Aug; 53(8):1165-73. PubMed ID: 27167853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Processing of featural and configural aspects of faces is lateralized in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex: a TMS study.
    Renzi C; Schiavi S; Carbon CC; Vecchi T; Silvanto J; Cattaneo Z
    Neuroimage; 2013 Jul; 74():45-51. PubMed ID: 23435211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does face inversion qualitatively change face processing: an eye movement study using a face change detection task.
    Xu B; Tanaka JW
    J Vis; 2013 Feb; 13(2):. PubMed ID: 23420421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spatial attention modulates the temporal sequence of hemispheric asymmetry in configural and featural face processing.
    Wang H; Fu S
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Mar; 111():269-275. PubMed ID: 29374552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Features are also important: contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition.
    Cabeza R; Kato T
    Psychol Sci; 2000 Sep; 11(5):429-33. PubMed ID: 11228917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are preschoolers sensitive to configural information in faces?
    Pellicano E; Rhodes G; Peters M
    Dev Sci; 2006 May; 9(3):270-7. PubMed ID: 16669797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Configural and featural discriminations use the same spatial frequencies: a model observer versus human observer analysis.
    Collin CA; Rainville S; Watier N; Boutet I
    Perception; 2014; 43(6):509-26. PubMed ID: 25154285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.