199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32694020)
1. Stress distribution with extra-short implants in an angled frictional system: A finite element analysis study.
de Souza Rendohl E; Brandt WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Dec; 124(6):728.e1-728.e9. PubMed ID: 32694020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional Finite Element Stress Pattern Analysis in Bone around Implant-supported Abutment with Different Angulations under Axial and Oblique Load.
Uppalapati V; Kumar S; Aggarwal R; Bhat I; Munaganti J; Khan S
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jan; 24(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 37189007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.
Zhang WT; Cheng KJ; Liu YF; Wang R; Chen YF; Ding YD; Yang F; Wang LH
BMC Oral Health; 2022 Sep; 22(1):431. PubMed ID: 36180871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Investigation of the Type of Angled Abutment for Anterior Maxillary Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Korkmaz IH; Kul E
J Prosthodont; 2022 Oct; 31(8):689-696. PubMed ID: 34859942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of different design of abutment and implant on stress distribution in 2 implants and peripheral bone: A finite element analysis study.
Kul E; Korkmaz İH
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):664.e1-664.e9. PubMed ID: 33573834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of abutment angulation on the strain on the bone around an implant in the anterior maxilla: a finite element study.
Saab XE; Griggs JA; Powers JM; Engelmeier RL
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Feb; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 17341376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of strain generated in bone by "platform-switched" and "non-platform-switched" implants with straight and angulated abutments under vertical and angulated load: a finite element analysis study.
Paul S; Padmanabhan TV; Swarup S
Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 23852226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical analysis of 4 types of short dental implants in a resorbed mandible.
Lee H; Park S; Noh G
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Apr; 121(4):659-670. PubMed ID: 30580986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Implant-Abutment Connections, Retention Systems, and Restorative Materials in the Implant-Supported Single Crowns Using 3D Finite Element Analysis.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; de Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; de Oliveira Limírio JPJ; Pellizzer EP
J Oral Implantol; 2022 Jun; 48(3):194-201. PubMed ID: 34091686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of bone quality and bone loss level around internal and external connection implants: A finite element analysis study.
Lemos CAA; Verri FR; Noritomi PY; Kemmoku DT; Souza Batista VE; Cruz RS; de Luna Gomes JM; Pellizzer EP
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):137.e1-137.e10. PubMed ID: 33139058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of stress extent at peri-implant bone surrounding external hexagon or Morse taper implants.
Macedo JP; Pereira J; Faria J; Pereira CA; Alves JL; Henriques B; Souza JCM; López-López J
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2017 Jul; 71():441-447. PubMed ID: 28499606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite Element Analysis of the Stress Distribution Associated With Different Implant Designs for Different Bone Densities.
Leblebicioğlu Kurtuluş I; Kilic K; Bal B; Kilavuz A
J Prosthodont; 2022 Aug; 31(7):614-622. PubMed ID: 35603892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of Connection Types and Implant Number on the Biomechanical Behavior of Mandibular Full-Arch Rehabilitation.
Sousa RM; Simamoto-Junior PC; Fernandes-Neto AJ; Sloten JV; Jaecques SV; Pessoa RS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):750-60. PubMed ID: 27447140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of Stress Distribution Among Two Different Pre-angled Abutments of Implants in Two Different Densities of Bone at Different Levels Along the Implant-/n Vitro Study.
Singh NK; Chalapathy SB; Thota RP; Chakravarthula K; Tirnati R; Yenugupalli K
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1370-1375. PubMed ID: 30602643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Platform switching: biomechanical evaluation using three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Tabata LF; Rocha EP; Barão VA; Assunção WG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):482-91. PubMed ID: 21691594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
de Oliveira Silva TS; Mendes Alencar SM; da Silva Valente V; de Moura CDVS
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of Platform Switching on Crestal Bone Stress in Tapered and Cylindrical Implants: A Finite Element Analysis.
Rasouli-Ghahroudi AA; Geramy A; Yaghobee S; Khorsand A; Yousefifakhr H; Rokn A; Soolari A
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2015 Jan; 17(1):2-13. PubMed ID: 26233968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of the implant design on peri-implant bone stress and abutment micromovement: three-dimensional finite element analysis of original computer-aided design models.
Yamanishi Y; Yamaguchi S; Imazato S; Nakano T; Yatani H
J Periodontol; 2014 Sep; 85(9):e333-8. PubMed ID: 24835549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mechanical Resistance of a 2.9-mm-Diameter Dental Implant With a Morse-Taper Implant-Abutment Connection.
Alberti A; Corbella S; Francetti L
J Oral Implantol; 2023 Jun; 49(3):323-329. PubMed ID: 36796063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis.
Akça K; Cehreli MC; Iplikçioğlu H
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2003 Aug; 14(4):444-54. PubMed ID: 12869007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
