These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32694882)

  • 1. Individual differences in learning the regularities between orthography, phonology and semantics predict early reading skills.
    Siegelman N; Rueckl JG; Steacy LM; Frost SJ; van den Bunt M; Zevin JD; Seidenberg MS; Pugh KR; Compton DL; Morris RD
    J Mem Lang; 2020 Oct; 114():. PubMed ID: 32694882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quantifying the regularities between orthography and semantics and their impact on group- and individual-level behavior.
    Siegelman N; Rueckl JG; Lo JCM; Kearns DM; Morris RD; Compton DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Jun; 48(6):839-855. PubMed ID: 35084923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using information-theoretic measures to characterize the structure of the writing system: the case of orthographic-phonological regularities in English.
    Siegelman N; Kearns DM; Rueckl JG
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Jun; 52(3):1292-1312. PubMed ID: 31950361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical learning and children's emergent literacy in rural Côte d'Ivoire.
    Zinszer BD; Hannon J; Hu A; Kouadio AÉ; Akpé H; Tanoh F; Wang M; Qi Z; Jasińska K
    Dev Sci; 2023 Sep; ():e13448. PubMed ID: 37743565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Implicit Learning of Written Regularities and Its Relation to Literacy Acquisition in a Shallow Orthography.
    Nigro L; Jiménez-Fernández G; Simpson IC; Defior S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2015 Oct; 44(5):571-85. PubMed ID: 24935792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How you read affects what you gain: Individual differences in the functional organization of the reading system predict intervention gains in children with reading disabilities.
    Siegelman N; Rueckl JG; van den Bunt M; Frijters JC; Zevin JD; Lovett MW; Seidenberg MS; Pugh KR; Morris RD
    J Educ Psychol; 2022 May; 114(4):855-869. PubMed ID: 35602092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Print-sound regularities are more important than print-meaning regularities in the initial stages of learning to read: Response to Bowers & Bowers (2018).
    Rastle K; Taylor JSH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jul; 71(7):1501-1505. PubMed ID: 29741458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neurocognitive mechanisms of learning to read: print tuning in beginning readers related to word-reading fluency and semantics but not phonology.
    Eberhard-Moscicka AK; Jost LB; Raith M; Maurer U
    Dev Sci; 2015 Jan; 18(1):106-18. PubMed ID: 24863157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Spoken language proficiency predicts print-speech convergence in beginning readers.
    Marks RA; Kovelman I; Kepinska O; Oliver M; Xia Z; Haft SL; Zekelman L; Duong P; Uchikoshi Y; Hancock R; Hoeft F
    Neuroimage; 2019 Nov; 201():116021. PubMed ID: 31310862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain bases of morphological processing in young children.
    Arredondo MM; Ip KI; Shih Ju Hsu L; Tardif T; Kovelman I
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Aug; 36(8):2890-900. PubMed ID: 25930011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visual sign phonology: insights into human reading and language from a natural soundless phonology.
    Petitto LA; Langdon C; Stone A; Andriola D; Kartheiser G; Cochran C
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 7(6):366-381. PubMed ID: 27425650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reading as Statistical Learning.
    Arciuli J
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2018 Aug; 49(3S):634-643. PubMed ID: 30120442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Word reading skill predicts anticipation of upcoming spoken language input: a study of children developing proficiency in reading.
    Mani N; Huettig F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():264-79. PubMed ID: 24955519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modelling individual differences in reading using an optimised MikeNet simulator: the impact of reading instruction.
    Chang YN; Chang TJ; Lin WF; Kuo CE; Shi YT; Lee HW
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2024; 18():1356483. PubMed ID: 38974479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prereader to beginning reader: changes induced by reading acquisition in print and speech brain networks.
    Chyl K; Kossowski B; Dębska A; Łuniewska M; Banaszkiewicz A; Żelechowska A; Frost SJ; Mencl WE; Wypych M; Marchewka A; Pugh KR; Jednoróg K
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2018 Jan; 59(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 28691732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Changing Role of Phonology in Reading Development.
    Milledge SV; Blythe HI
    Vision (Basel); 2019 May; 3(2):. PubMed ID: 31735824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aphasia in Persian: Implications for cognitive models of lexical processing.
    Bakhtiar M; Jafary R; Weekes BS
    J Neuropsychol; 2017 Sep; 11(3):414-435. PubMed ID: 26762893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Redefining "Learning" in Statistical Learning: What Does an Online Measure Reveal About the Assimilation of Visual Regularities?
    Siegelman N; Bogaerts L; Kronenfeld O; Frost R
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):692-727. PubMed ID: 28986971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Developmental dissociations between lexical reading and comprehension: evidence from two cases of hyperlexia.
    Castles A; Crichton A; Prior M
    Cortex; 2010; 46(10):1238-47. PubMed ID: 20678759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. CDP++.Italian: modelling sublexical and supralexical inconsistency in a shallow orthography.
    Perry C; Ziegler JC; Zorzi M
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94291. PubMed ID: 24740261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.