These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32695338)

  • 1. Body fat percentage assessment by skinfold equation, bioimpedance and densitometry in older adults.
    Silveira EA; Barbosa LS; Rodrigues APS; Noll M; De Oliveira C
    Arch Public Health; 2020; 78():65. PubMed ID: 32695338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of body fat percentage assessments by bioelectrical impedance analysis, anthropometrical prediction equations, and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in older women.
    Velázquez-Alva MC; Irigoyen-Camacho ME; Zepeda-Zepeda MA; Rangel-Castillo I; Arrieta-Cruz I; Mendoza-Garcés L; Castaño-Seiquer A; Flores-Fraile J; Gutiérrez-Juárez R
    Front Nutr; 2022; 9():978971. PubMed ID: 36618693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Estimations of body fat by anthropometry or bioelectrical impedance differ from those by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in prefrail community-dwelling older women.
    da Silva JSM; Biesek S; Vojciechowski AS; Borba VZC; Rabito EI; Gomes ARS; Oliveira LA
    Nutr Res; 2021 Feb; 86():1-9. PubMed ID: 33444993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Validity and agreement between dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, anthropometry and bioelectrical impedance in the estimation of fat mass in young adults.
    Mecherques-Carini M; Albaladejo-Saura M; Vaquero-Cristóbal R; Baglietto N; Esparza-Ros F
    Front Nutr; 2024; 11():1421950. PubMed ID: 38919386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Slaughter Skinfold-Thickness Equations, and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry for Estimating Body Fat Percentage in Colombian Children and Adolescents with Excess of Adiposity.
    González-Ruíz K; Medrano M; Correa-Bautista JE; García-Hermoso A; Prieto-Benavides DH; Tordecilla-Sanders A; Agostinis-Sobrinho C; Correa-Rodríguez M; Schmidt Rio-Valle J; González-Jiménez E; Ramírez-Vélez R
    Nutrients; 2018 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 30110944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness.
    Kogure GS; Silva RC; Ribeiro VB; Mendes MC; Menezes-Reis R; Ferriani RA; Furtado CLM; Reis RMD
    Arch Endocrinol Metab; 2020; 64(3):257-268. PubMed ID: 32555992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measurement of body fat in healthy elderly men: a comparison of methods.
    Ravaglia G; Forti P; Maioli F; Boschi F; Cicognani A; Gasbarrini G
    J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci; 1999 Feb; 54(2):M70-6. PubMed ID: 10051858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of body composition methods in overweight and obese Brazilian women.
    Braulio VB; Furtado VC; Silveira Md; Fonseca MH; Oliveira JE
    Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol; 2010 Jun; 54(4):398-405. PubMed ID: 20625652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy of surrogate methods to estimate skeletal muscle mass in non-dialysis dependent patients with chronic kidney disease and in kidney transplant recipients.
    Barreto Silva MI; Menna Barreto APM; Pontes KSDS; Costa MSD; Rosina KTC; Souza E; Bregman R; Prado CM; Klein MRST
    Clin Nutr; 2021 Jan; 40(1):303-312. PubMed ID: 32536581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Body Composition Measurement in Bronchiectasis: Comparison between Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis, Skinfold Thickness Measurement, and Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry before and after Pulmonary Rehabilitation.
    Doña E; Olveira C; Palenque FJ; Porras N; Dorado A; Martín-Valero R; Godoy AM; Espíldora F; Contreras V; Olveira G
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2018 Aug; 118(8):1464-1473. PubMed ID: 29656933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Body fat percentage assessment using skinfold thickness agrees with measures obtained by DXA scan in African American and Caucasian American women.
    Cedillo YE; Knight RO; Darnell B; Fernandez JR; Moellering DR
    Nutr Res; 2022 Sep; 105():154-162. PubMed ID: 36049380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predicting fat percent by skinfolds in racial groups: Durnin and Womersley revisited.
    Davidson LE; Wang J; Thornton JC; Kaleem Z; Silva-Palacios F; Pierson RN; Heymsfield SB; Gallagher D
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Mar; 43(3):542-9. PubMed ID: 20689462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Accuracy of skinfold and bioelectrical impedance assessments of body fat percentage in ambulatory individuals with cerebral palsy.
    Oeffinger DJ; Gurka MJ; Kuperminc M; Hassani S; Buhr N; Tylkowski C
    Dev Med Child Neurol; 2014 May; 56(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 24344745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Body fat percentage prediction in older adults: Agreement between anthropometric equations and DXA.
    Silveira EA; Barbosa LS; Noll M; Pinheiro HA; de Oliveira C
    Clin Nutr; 2021 Apr; 40(4):2091-2099. PubMed ID: 33071014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry to measure body fat percentage in overweight/obese Colombian adults.
    Ramírez-Vélez R; Tordecilla-Sanders A; Correa-Bautista JE; González-Ruíz K; González-Jiménez E; Triana-Reina HR; García-Hermoso A; Schmidt-RioValle J
    Am J Hum Biol; 2018 Jan; 30(1):. PubMed ID: 28987018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Smartphone camera based assessment of adiposity: a validation study.
    Majmudar MD; Chandra S; Yakkala K; Kennedy S; Agrawal A; Sippel M; Ramu P; Chaudhri A; Smith B; Criminisi A; Heymsfield SB; Stanford FC
    NPJ Digit Med; 2022 Jun; 5(1):79. PubMed ID: 35768575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of hand-to-hand bioimpedance and anthropometry equations versus dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the assessment of body fat percentage in 17-18-year-old conscripts.
    Lintsi M; Kaarma H; Kull I
    Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Mar; 24(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 15056180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Body Fat Analysis in Predialysis Chronic Kidney Disease: Multifrequency Bioimpedance Assay and Anthropometry Compared With Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
    Ravindranath J; Pillai PP; Parameswaran S; Kamalanathan SK; Pal GK
    J Ren Nutr; 2016 Sep; 26(5):315-9. PubMed ID: 27238245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Body composition in adults with cerebral palsy by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and skinfold anthropometry compared with the 18O isotope-dilution technique.
    Hildreth HG; Johnson RK; Goran MI; Contompasis SH
    Am J Clin Nutr; 1997 Dec; 66(6):1436-42. PubMed ID: 9394697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relative fat mass is a better tool to diagnose high adiposity when compared to body mass index in young male adults: A cross-section study.
    Corrêa CR; Formolo NPS; Dezanetti T; Speretta GFF; Nunes EA
    Clin Nutr ESPEN; 2021 Feb; 41():225-233. PubMed ID: 33487268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.