104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3269738)
1. The selection of films and intensifying screens for use as a two-dimensional detector in a computed tomography system.
Truscott JG; Westmacott CF; Bentley HB; Horsman A
Radiogr Today; 1988 Nov; 54(618):31-4. PubMed ID: 3269738
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Further comparisons of films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1990 Feb; 63(746):128-31. PubMed ID: 2310905
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [An experimental study of the film parameters for general roentgenography].
Gorelik FG
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):32-6. PubMed ID: 11076363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Compatibility characteristics of five radiographic films utilised in Brazilian diagnostic radiology.
Magalhaes LA; Drexler GG; de Almeida CE
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Sep; 156(2):184-9. PubMed ID: 23651656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spelling out bid specifications for film purchase.
Trefler M; Russell E; Ungaro JW
Appl Radiol; 1981; 10(5):76, 78. PubMed ID: 10254043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Processor quality assurance using digital imaging.
Goren AD; Dunn SM; Van der Stelt PF
N Y State Dent J; 1997 Apr; 63(4):42-7. PubMed ID: 9167431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Reduction of radiation dosage by the use of newer reinforced rare earth films].
Hofmann T
Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1987; 19(1):107-10. PubMed ID: 3474210
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic quality versus patient exposure with five panoramic screen-film combinations.
D'Ambrosio JA; Schiff TG; McDavid WD; Langland OE
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1986 Apr; 61(4):409-11. PubMed ID: 3458153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reproducibility of screen-film performance tests--developing standards.
Sluming V
Br J Radiol; 1997 Mar; 70():233-4. PubMed ID: 9166044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Films, screens and cassettes for mammography.
Law J; Kirkpatrick AE
Br J Radiol; 1989 Feb; 62(734):163-7. PubMed ID: 2924096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [X-ray image detectors in stomatology].
Gorelik FG
Med Tekh; 1998; (6):17-9. PubMed ID: 9949983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Sensitivity and dosage requirements of film-screen combinations].
von Volkmann T
Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Aug; 41(8):265-70. PubMed ID: 3175769
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of screen/film combinations for cephalometric radiography.
McNicol A; Stirrups DR
Br J Orthod; 1985 Jul; 12(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 3860251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Digital radiography].
Haendle J
Computertomographie; 1983 Mar; 3(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 6354446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a new phosphor plate technology for neonatal portable chest radiographs.
Cohen M; Corea D; Wanner M; Karmazyn B; Gunderman R; Applegate K; Jennings SG
Acad Radiol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):197-8. PubMed ID: 21232684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does quantity of film reading affect quality?
Given-Wilson R; Blanks R
Clin Radiol; 2011 Feb; 66(2):97-8. PubMed ID: 21216322
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Clinical evaluation of intensifying screens and films for intraoral radiography].
Okano T; Yoda E
Kokubyo Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Mar; 50(1):155. PubMed ID: 6577111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of an asymmetric screen-film combination with a conventional screen-film combination for chest radiography in 51 patients.
Greaney T; McCoy C; Masterson J
Br J Radiol; 1997 Sep; 70(837):929-32. PubMed ID: 9486069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
