These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

53 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3269789)

  • 1. The percentage reliability of Angle ANB.
    Chandra KG
    J Pierre Fauchard Acad; 1987 Jun; 1(2):55-60, 71. PubMed ID: 3269789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Correlation between the apical bases (ANB angle) and cephalometric discrepancies evaluated with the "I" line and 1-VT distance, in non-orthodontic patients].
    Galvao CA
    Rev Iberoam Ortod; 1983 Sep; 3(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 6589706
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Determination of stature from cephalo-facial dimensions in a North Indian population.
    Krishan K; Kumar R
    Leg Med (Tokyo); 2007 May; 9(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 17306595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computer prediction of hard tissue profiles in orthognathic surgery.
    Loh S; Yow M
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2002; 17(4):342-7. PubMed ID: 12593006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Asymmetry of the human facial skeleton.
    Vig PS; Hewitt AB
    Angle Orthod; 1975 Apr; 45(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 1054939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandibular advancement surgery in high-angle and low-angle class II patients: different long-term skeletal responses.
    Mobarak KA; Espeland L; Krogstad O; Lyberg T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Apr; 119(4):368-81. PubMed ID: 11298310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Statistical analysis of the correlation of the soft tissue profile on the skeletal and dental elements using the Neger angle].
    Roth R; Rutz A; Schnieper R
    Inf Orthod Kieferorthop; 1981; 13(3):199-216. PubMed ID: 6946966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of clinical measurements used in the determination of facial indices.
    Mommaerts MY; Moerenhout BA
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2008 Jul; 36(5):279-84. PubMed ID: 18358735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Methodologic problems in the study of the craniofacial complex].
    Pinto-Cisternas J; Muller G; Champin J
    Rev Iberoam Ortod; 1983 Sep; 3(2):13-26. PubMed ID: 6589703
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Lateral cephalometry in 100 Harbin children with normal occlusion].
    Chen YX
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Ke Za Zhi; 1985 Jan; 20(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 3858083
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Skeletal alterations following TOVRO or BSSO procedures.
    Phillips C; Zaytoun HS; Thomas PM; Terry BC
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1986; 1(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 3463627
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.
    Tanaka JL; Ono E; Filho Medici E; Cesar de Moraes L; Cezar de Melo Castilho J; Leonelli de Moraes ME
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(4):369-75. PubMed ID: 17190230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Head posture and craniofacial morphology in adults from northern Finland.
    Huggare J
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1986; 82(4):199-208. PubMed ID: 3809159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The sagittal relation of the craniofacial skeletal base as analysed by 3 cephalometric methods based respectively on angle, line and arch value].
    Miotti F
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1983; 2(1):121-3. PubMed ID: 6583174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Brief communication: measurement size, precision, and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: bigger is better.
    Jamison PL; Ward RE
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1993 Apr; 90(4):495-500. PubMed ID: 8476006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The McNamara line: significance and reliability].
    Chabert G; Bounoure GM; Theuveny T
    Rev Orthop Dento Faciale; 1985 Oct; 19(4):549-62. PubMed ID: 3869864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A cephalometric appraisal of Chinese adults having normal occlusion and excellent facial types.
    Lin WL
    J Osaka Dent Univ; 1985 Apr; 19(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 3869214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The architecture of the facial skeleton in distocclusion and its changes after treatment with the functional regulator].
    Choroschilkina FJ; Malygin JM
    Stomatol DDR; 1983 Mar; 33(3):201-6. PubMed ID: 6577743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.