307 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32698196)
1. Benchmarking variant callers in next-generation and third-generation sequencing analysis.
Pei S; Liu T; Ren X; Li W; Chen C; Xie Z
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32698196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. SNVSniffer: an integrated caller for germline and somatic single-nucleotide and indel mutations.
Liu Y; Loewer M; Aluru S; Schmidt B
BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Aug; 10 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):47. PubMed ID: 27489955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of GATK and DeepVariant by trio sequencing.
Lin YL; Chang PC; Hsu C; Hung MZ; Chien YH; Hwu WL; Lai F; Lee NC
Sci Rep; 2022 Feb; 12(1):1809. PubMed ID: 35110657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. INDELseek: detection of complex insertions and deletions from next-generation sequencing data.
Au CH; Leung AY; Kwong A; Chan TL; Ma ES
BMC Genomics; 2017 Jan; 18(1):16. PubMed ID: 28056804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic comparison of germline variant calling pipelines cross multiple next-generation sequencers.
Chen J; Li X; Zhong H; Meng Y; Du H
Sci Rep; 2019 Jun; 9(1):9345. PubMed ID: 31249349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. ICR142 Benchmarker: evaluating, optimising and benchmarking variant calling performance using the ICR142 NGS validation series.
Ruark E; Holt E; Renwick A; Münz M; Wakeling M; Ellard S; Mahamdallie S; Yost S; Rahman N
Wellcome Open Res; 2018; 3():108. PubMed ID: 30483600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of three variant callers for human whole genome sequencing.
Supernat A; Vidarsson OV; Steen VM; Stokowy T
Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):17851. PubMed ID: 30552369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An analytical workflow for accurate variant discovery in highly divergent regions.
Tian S; Yan H; Neuhauser C; Slager SL
BMC Genomics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):703. PubMed ID: 27590916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and efficiency of germline variant calling pipelines for human genome data.
Zhao S; Agafonov O; Azab A; Stokowy T; Hovig E
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20222. PubMed ID: 33214604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sentieon DNASeq Variant Calling Workflow Demonstrates Strong Computational Performance and Accuracy.
Kendig KI; Baheti S; Bockol MA; Drucker TM; Hart SN; Heldenbrand JR; Hernaez M; Hudson ME; Kalmbach MT; Klee EW; Mattson NR; Ross CA; Taschuk M; Wieben ED; Wiepert M; Wildman DE; Mainzer LS
Front Genet; 2019; 10():736. PubMed ID: 31481971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Chang TC; Xu K; Cheng Z; Wu G
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():37-54. PubMed ID: 35230682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of post-alignment processing in variant discovery from whole exome data.
Tian S; Yan H; Kalmbach M; Slager SL
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):403. PubMed ID: 27716037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. FVC as an adaptive and accurate method for filtering variants from popular NGS analysis pipelines.
Ren Y; Kong Y; Zhou X; Genchev GZ; Zhou C; Zhao H; Lu H
Commun Biol; 2022 Sep; 5(1):975. PubMed ID: 36114280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of seven SNP calling pipelines for the next-generation sequencing data of chickens.
Liu J; Shen Q; Bao H
PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262574. PubMed ID: 35100292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A study on fast calling variants from next-generation sequencing data using decision tree.
Li Z; Wang Y; Wang F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):145. PubMed ID: 29673316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Systematic comparison of variant calling pipelines using gold standard personal exome variants.
Hwang S; Kim E; Lee I; Marcotte EM
Sci Rep; 2015 Dec; 5():17875. PubMed ID: 26639839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluating the Calling Performance of a Rare Disease NGS Panel for Single Nucleotide and Copy Number Variants.
Cacheiro P; Ordóñez-Ugalde A; Quintáns B; Piñeiro-Hermida S; Amigo J; García-Murias M; Pascual-Pascual SI; Grandas F; Arpa J; Carracedo A; Sobrido MJ
Mol Diagn Ther; 2017 Jun; 21(3):303-313. PubMed ID: 28290094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A hybrid computational strategy to address WGS variant analysis in >5000 samples.
Huang Z; Rustagi N; Veeraraghavan N; Carroll A; Gibbs R; Boerwinkle E; Venkata MG; Yu F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Sep; 17(1):361. PubMed ID: 27612449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
