These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Longevity of conventional and bonded (sealed) amalgam restorations in a private general dental practice. Bonsor SJ; Chadwick RG Br Dent J; 2009 Jan; 206(2):E3; discussion 88-9. PubMed ID: 19148188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The safe and effective use of dental amalgam. Mjör IA Int Dent J; 1987 Sep; 37(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 3316042 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Amalgam. XI. Glass-ionomer as a possible substitute of amalgam: longevity]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1994 Jan; 101(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 11830988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A retrospective clinical study on longevity of posterior composite and amalgam restorations. Opdam NJ; Bronkhorst EM; Roeters JM; Loomans BA Dent Mater; 2007 Jan; 23(1):2-8. PubMed ID: 16417916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 'The longevity of occlusal amalgam restorations in first permanent molars of child patients'. Stanley A Br Dent J; 1985 Mar; 158(6):201. PubMed ID: 3859304 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Cavity preparations that extend the clinical longevity of amalgam restorations. Osborne JW; Summitt JB J Ala Dent Assoc; 1993; 77(3):12-8. PubMed ID: 8188974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Amalgam. IX. Substitute for amalgam: durability of composite restorations]. Schuurs AH; van Amerongen JP Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 Oct; 100(10):437-41. PubMed ID: 11822139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; van Dijken JW; Funegård U; Lindberg A; Nilsson M J Dent; 2009 Sep; 37(9):673-8. PubMed ID: 19477572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Amalgam. V. A durable restoration material?]. Penning C Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1993 May; 100(5):225-8. PubMed ID: 11822151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Restoration longevity and analysis of reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations provided by vocational dental practitioners and their trainers in the United Kingdom. Burke FJ; Cheung SW; Mjör IA; Wilson NH Quintessence Int; 1999 Apr; 30(4):234-42. PubMed ID: 10635250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Decisions of practitioners regarding placement of amalgam and composite restorations in general practice settings. Pink FE; Minden NJ; Simmonds S Oper Dent; 1994; 19(4):127-32. PubMed ID: 9028231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The composite resin restoration: a literature review. Part II. Comparisons between composite and alloy restorations. Full CA; Hollander WR ASDC J Dent Child; 1993; 60(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 8432948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Case report of a 40-year, five surface complex amalgam restoration. Chan DC; Grubbs K; Osborne JW Oper Dent; 2002; 27(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 12413232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]