These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32701928)

  • 1. Volume and effectiveness assessment of articain 4% versus mepivacaine 2% used in third molar surgery: randomized, double-blind, split-mouth controlled clinical trial.
    Almeida PC; Raldi FV; Sato FR; Nascimento RD; Moraes MB
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2020 Nov; 25(6):e762-e768. PubMed ID: 32701928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
    Colombini BL; Modena KC; Calvo AM; Sakai VT; Giglio FP; Dionísio TJ; Trindade AS; Lauris JR; Santos CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative study of the anaesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% mepivacaine in mandibular third molar germectomy using different anaesthetic techniques: a split-mouth clinical trial.
    Menditti D; Boccellino M; Nucci L; Ribeiro Sobrinho AP; Marotta A; Angrisani P; Cantore S; Menditti M; Vitiello A; DI Domenico M; Rinaldi B; DE Rosa A
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2023 Feb; 72(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 36847742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of analgesia promoted by lidocaine and articaine in third molar extraction surgery. A split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial.
    de Souza Santos S; Bonatto MS; Mendes PGJ; Martins AVB; Pereira DA; de Oliveira GJPL
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; 28(2):919-924. PubMed ID: 38355872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
    Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and Safety of 2% and 4% Articaine for Lower Third Molar Surgery.
    Senes AM; Calvo AM; Colombini-Ishikiriama BL; Gonçalves PZ; Dionísio TJ; Sant'ana E; Brozoski DT; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Santos CF
    J Dent Res; 2015 Sep; 94(9 Suppl):166S-73S. PubMed ID: 26202994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial on analgesic efficacy of local anesthetics articaine and bupivacaine after impacted third molar extraction.
    Olmedo-Gaya MV; Manzano-Moreno FJ; Muñoz-López JL; Vallecillo-Capilla MF; Reyes-Botella C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2018 Dec; 22(9):2981-2988. PubMed ID: 29450738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
    Sierra Rebolledo A; Delgado Molina E; Berini Aytís L; Gay Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2007 Mar; 12(2):E139-44. PubMed ID: 17322803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.
    Gregorio LV; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Modena KC; Colombini BL; Calvo AM; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Trindade Junior AS; Santos CF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 18420431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative study of two local anesthetics in the surgical extraction of mandibular third molars: bupivacaine and articaine.
    Trullenque-Eriksson A; Guisado-Moya B
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2011 May; 16(3):e390-6. PubMed ID: 21196829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Alterations in monitored vital constants induced by various local anesthetics in combination with different vasoconstrictors in the surgical removal of lower third molars.
    Carrera I; Mestre R; Berini L; Gay-Escoda C
    Bull Group Int Rech Sci Stomatol Odontol; 2000; 42(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 11799734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Epinephrine concentration (1:100,000 or 1:200,000) does not affect the clinical efficacy of 4% articaine for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
    Santos CF; Modena KC; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Calvo AM; Colombini BL; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Faria FA; Trindade AS; Lauris JR
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 65(12):2445-52. PubMed ID: 18022467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of Two Different Anesthetic Solutions on Injection Pain, Efficacy, and Duration of Soft-Tissue Anesthesia with Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Molars.
    Elbay ÜŞ; Elbay M; Kaya E; Yıldırım S
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):456-463. PubMed ID: 27805885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pulsioxymetry monitorization during lower third molar extraction. A comparative study of three local anesthetics with epinephrine 1:100,000.
    Mestre Aspa R; Carrera Grañó I; Berini Aytés L; Gay Escoda C
    Med Oral; 2001; 6(3):195-204. PubMed ID: 11500637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of 4% articaine with epinephrine (1:100,000) and without epinephrine in inferior alveolar block for tooth extraction: double-blind randomized clinical trial of anesthetic efficacy.
    Kämmerer PW; Palarie V; Daubländer M; Bicer C; Shabazfar N; Brüllmann D; Al-Nawas B
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2012 Apr; 113(4):495-9. PubMed ID: 22676931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Patient's pain perception during mandibular molar extraction with articaine: a comparison study between infiltration and inferior alveolar nerve block.
    Bataineh AB; Alwarafi MA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2241-2250. PubMed ID: 26791025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Anesthetic Efficacy of Articaine and Lidocaine in Equivalent Doses as Buccal and Non-Palatal Infiltration for Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Majid OW; Ahmed AM
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Apr; 76(4):737-743. PubMed ID: 29257943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bupivacaine 0.5% versus articaine 4% for the removal of lower third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial.
    Sancho-Puchades M; Vílchez-Pérez MÁ; Valmaseda-Castellón E; Paredes-García J; Berini-Aytés L; Gay-Escoda C
    Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 May; 17(3):e462-8. PubMed ID: 22143739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and efficacy of 4% articaine in mandibular third-molar extraction: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
    Santos-Sanz L; Toledano-Serrabona J; Gay-Escoda C
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Dec; 151(12):912-923.e10. PubMed ID: 33228884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Effectiveness of Ropivacaine and Mepivacaine in the Postoperative Pain after Third Lower Molar Surgery.
    Crincoli V; Favia G; LImongelli L; Tempesta A; Brienza N
    Int J Med Sci; 2015; 12(11):862-6. PubMed ID: 26640405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.