219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32702015)
1. A multi-scale modelling framework combining musculoskeletal rigid-body simulations with adaptive finite element analyses, to evaluate the impact of femoral geometry on hip joint contact forces and femoral bone growth.
Kainz H; Killen BA; Wesseling M; Perez-Boerema F; Pitto L; Garcia Aznar JM; Shefelbine S; Jonkers I
PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235966. PubMed ID: 32702015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of femoral anteversion angle and neck-shaft angle on muscle forces and joint loading during walking.
Kainz H; Mindler GT; Kranzl A
PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0291458. PubMed ID: 37824447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hip contact force in presence of aberrant bone geometry during normal and pathological gait.
Bosmans L; Wesseling M; Desloovere K; Molenaers G; Scheys L; Jonkers I
J Orthop Res; 2014 Nov; 32(11):1406-15. PubMed ID: 25087777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of muscle groups' activation on proximal femoral growth tendency.
Yadav P; Shefelbine SJ; Pontén E; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2017 Dec; 16(6):1869-1883. PubMed ID: 28639152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subject-specific hip geometry affects predicted hip joint contact forces during gait.
Lenaerts G; De Groote F; Demeulenaere B; Mulier M; Van der Perre G; Spaepen A; Jonkers I
J Biomech; 2008; 41(6):1243-52. PubMed ID: 18346745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.
Lenaerts G; Bartels W; Gelaude F; Mulier M; Spaepen A; Van der Perre G; Jonkers I
J Biomech; 2009 Jun; 42(9):1246-51. PubMed ID: 19464012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. No effect of femoral offset on bone implant micromotion in an experimental model.
Amirouche F; Solitro G; Walia A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2016 May; 102(3):379-85. PubMed ID: 26970866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of hip anatomical variations on the cartilage stress: a finite element analysis towards the biomechanical exploration of the factors that may explain primary hip arthritis in morphologically normal subjects.
Sánchez Egea AJ; Valera M; Parraga Quiroga JM; Proubasta I; Noailly J; Lacroix D
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Apr; 29(4):444-50. PubMed ID: 24530154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sensitivity of femoral strain calculations to anatomical scaling errors in musculoskeletal models of movement.
Martelli S; Kersh ME; Pandy MG
J Biomech; 2015 Oct; 48(13):3606-15. PubMed ID: 26315919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of altered gait patterns on the hip joint contact forces.
Carriero A; Zavatsky A; Stebbins J; Theologis T; Lenaerts G; Jonkers I; Shefelbine SJ
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2014; 17(4):352-9. PubMed ID: 22587414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of the femur during stance phase of gait based on musculoskeletal model simulation.
Seo JW; Kang DW; Kim JY; Yang ST; Kim DH; Choi JS; Tack GR
Biomed Mater Eng; 2014; 24(6):2485-93. PubMed ID: 25226949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of subject-specific musculoskeletal loading on the prediction of bone density distribution in the proximal femur.
Vahdati A; Walscharts S; Jonkers I; Garcia-Aznar JM; Vander Sloten J; van Lenthe GH
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Feb; 30():244-52. PubMed ID: 24342624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomical and biomechanical investigations of the iliotibial tract.
Birnbaum K; Siebert CH; Pandorf T; Schopphoff E; Prescher A; Niethard FU
Surg Radiol Anat; 2004 Dec; 26(6):433-46. PubMed ID: 15378277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients.
Heller MO; Bergmann G; Deuretzbacher G; Claes L; Haas NP; Duda GN
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2001 Oct; 16(8):644-9. PubMed ID: 11535345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The role of altered proximal femoral geometry in impaired pelvis stability and hip control during CP gait: A simulation study.
Bosmans L; Jansen K; Wesseling M; Molenaers G; Scheys L; Jonkers I
Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():61-7. PubMed ID: 27004634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of growth plate geometry and growth direction on prediction of proximal femoral morphology.
Yadav P; Shefelbine SJ; Gutierrez-Farewik EM
J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1613-1619. PubMed ID: 27063249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the effects of muscle activation on knee, thigh, and hip injuries in frontal crashes using a finite-element model with muscle forces from subject testing and musculoskeletal modeling.
Chang CY; Rupp JD; Reed MP; Hughes RE; Schneider LW
Stapp Car Crash J; 2009 Nov; 53():291-328. PubMed ID: 20058559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased knee flexion in participants with cerebral palsy results in altered stresses at the distal femoral growth plate compared to a typically developing cohort.
Koller W; Wallnöfer E; Holder J; Kranzl A; Mindler G; Baca A; Kainz H
Gait Posture; 2024 Jun; 113():158-166. PubMed ID: 38905850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Calculation of muscle forces during normal gait under consideration of femoral bending moments.
Lutz F; Mastel R; Runge M; Stief F; Schmidt A; Meurer A; Witte H
Med Eng Phys; 2016 Sep; 38(9):1008-15. PubMed ID: 27318439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
