These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32703124)

  • 1. Relative efficiencies of alternative preference-based designs for randomised trials.
    Walter SD; Bian M
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Dec; 29(12):3783-3803. PubMed ID: 32703124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimising the two-stage randomised trial design when some participants are indifferent in their treatment preferences.
    Walter SD; Turner RM; Macaskill P
    Stat Med; 2019 Jun; 38(13):2317-2331. PubMed ID: 30793786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Beyond the treatment effect: Evaluating the effects of patient preferences in randomised trials.
    Walter SD; Turner R; Macaskill P; McCaffery KJ; Irwig L
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):489-507. PubMed ID: 25213116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taking a chance: How likely am I to receive my preferred treatment in a clinical trial?
    Walter SD; Blaha O; Esserman D
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Mar; 32(3):572-592. PubMed ID: 36628522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimation of treatment preference effects in clinical trials when some participants are indifferent to treatment choice.
    Walter SD; Turner RM; Macaskill P; McCaffery KJ; Irwig L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Feb; 17(1):29. PubMed ID: 28219326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimal allocation of participants for the estimation of selection, preference and treatment effects in the two-stage randomised trial design.
    Walter SD; Turner RM; Macaskill P; McCaffery KJ; Irwig L
    Stat Med; 2012 Jun; 31(13):1307-22. PubMed ID: 22362374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Randomised trials comparing different healthcare settings: an exploratory review of the impact of pre-trial preferences on participation, and discussion of other methodological challenges.
    Corbett MS; Watson J; Eastwood A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Oct; 16(1):589. PubMed ID: 27756285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Conceptual framework and systematic review of the effects of participants' and professionals' preferences in randomised controlled trials.
    King M; Nazareth I; Lampe F; Bower P; Chandler M; Morou M; Sibbald B; Lai R
    Health Technol Assess; 2005 Sep; 9(35):1-186, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 16153352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel preference-informed complementary trial (PICT) design for clinical trial research influenced by strong patient preferences.
    Ali S; Hopkin G; Poonai N; Richer L; Yaskina M; Heath A; Klassen TP; McCabe C; ;
    Trials; 2021 Mar; 22(1):206. PubMed ID: 33712062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of using a partially randomised patient preference design when evaluating alternative managements for heavy menstrual bleeding.
    Cooper KG; Grant AM; Garratt AM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Dec; 104(12):1367-73. PubMed ID: 9422014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sample Size and Power When Designing a Randomized Trial for the Estimation of Treatment, Selection, and Preference Effects.
    Turner RM; Walter SD; Macaskill P; McCaffery KJ; Irwig L
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Aug; 34(6):711-9. PubMed ID: 24695962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Conducting a two-stage preference trial: utility and challenges.
    Sidani S; Fox M; Epstein D
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2015 May; 52(5):1017-24. PubMed ID: 25736207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of surgeon and patient treatment preferences in an orthopaedic trauma surgery trial.
    Keding A; Handoll H; Brealey S; Jefferson L; Hewitt C; Corbacho B; Torgerson D; Rangan A
    Trials; 2019 Sep; 20(1):570. PubMed ID: 31533863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determinants of patients' treatment preferences in a clinical trial.
    Awad MA; Shapiro SH; Lund JP; Feine JS
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 28(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 10730720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Partially randomised patient preference trials as an alternative design to randomised controlled trials: systematic review and meta-analyses.
    Wasmann KA; Wijsman P; van Dieren S; Bemelman W; Buskens C
    BMJ Open; 2019 Oct; 9(10):e031151. PubMed ID: 31619428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing trial efficiency by early reallocation of placebo nonresponders in sequential parallel comparison designs: application to antidepressant trials.
    Boessen R; Knol MJ; Groenwold RH; Grobbee DE; Roes KC
    Clin Trials; 2012 Oct; 9(5):578-87. PubMed ID: 23060319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of Treatment Preference in Randomized Controlled Trials: Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis.
    Delevry D; Le QA
    Patient; 2019 Dec; 12(6):593-609. PubMed ID: 31372909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Extensions to the two-stage randomized trial design for testing treatment, self-selection, and treatment preference effects to binary outcomes.
    Cameron B; Peduzzi P; Esserman D
    Stat Med; 2018 Sep; 37(22):3147-3178. PubMed ID: 29855065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Randomised preference trial of medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy less than 14 weeks' gestation (TOPS).
    Robson SC; Kelly T; Howel D; Deverill M; Hewison J; Lie ML; Stamp E; Armstrong N; May CR
    Health Technol Assess; 2009 Nov; 13(53):1-124, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 19906334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Strategies of testing for syphilis during pregnancy.
    Shahrook S; Mori R; Ochirbat T; Gomi H
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 2014(10):CD010385. PubMed ID: 25352226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.