These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3270356)

  • 1. Biomechanical analysis on posterior spinal instrumentions for spinal deformities--a comparative study.
    Nagata H; Onomura T; Watanabe H
    Bull Osaka Med Coll; 1988 Nov; 34(1-2):37-47. PubMed ID: 3270356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bracing in spinal deformities.
    Watts HG
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1979 Oct; 10(4):769-85. PubMed ID: 523080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spine biomechanics: fundamentals and future.
    Benzel EC; Kayanja M; Fleischman A; Roy S
    Clin Neurosurg; 2006; 53():98-105. PubMed ID: 17380743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative biomechanical study of posterior instrumentation used in the scoliotic spine].
    Michel F; Petreto E; Mironneau A; Gonon G; Michel CR
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1987; 73 Suppl 2():234-6. PubMed ID: 3432684
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Fixator for the spine].
    Khvisiuk NI; Prodan AI; Sereba DM; Lygun LN
    Ortop Travmatol Protez; 1977 Jun; (6):78-9. PubMed ID: 917496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical spine surgery. Past, present, and future potential.
    Fielding JW
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1985 Nov; (200):284-90. PubMed ID: 4064390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical analysis of rotational motions after disc arthroplasty: implications for patients with adult deformities.
    McAfee PC; Cunningham BW; Hayes V; Sidiqi F; Dabbah M; Sefter JC; Hu N; Beatson H
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Sep; 31(19 Suppl):S152-60. PubMed ID: 16946633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The halo in spinal abnormalities: practical factors and avoidance of complications.
    Perry J
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1972 Mar; 3(1):69-80. PubMed ID: 5012588
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A biomechanical analysis of the self-retaining pedicle hook device in posterior spinal fixation.
    van Laar W; Meester RJ; Smit TH; van Royen BJ
    Eur Spine J; 2007 Aug; 16(8):1209-14. PubMed ID: 17203270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The posterior tether in scoliosis.
    Jarvis JG; Ashman RB; Johnston CE; Herring JA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1988 Feb; 227():126-34. PubMed ID: 3338202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of Harrington instrumentation and posterior spine fusion in the management of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
    Renshaw TS
    Orthop Clin North Am; 1988 Apr; 19(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 3282199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spinal instrumentation. Biomaterial, biomechanical, and clinical aspects.
    Cotler JM; Whitecloud TS; Weinstein JN; Yuan HA
    Contemp Orthop; 1992 Feb; 24(2):211-37. PubMed ID: 10149939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An in vitro biomechanical investigation: variable positioning of leopard carbon fiber interbody cages.
    Quigley KJ; Alander DH; Bledsoe JG
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Aug; 21(6):442-7. PubMed ID: 18679101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial: are spine biologics the future in spinal surgery?
    An HS; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2005; 5(6 Suppl):207S-208S. PubMed ID: 16291114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Congenital spine deformity: "What's the latest and what's the best"?
    Winter RB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1989 Dec; 14(12):1406-9. PubMed ID: 2694391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mechanical modulation of spinal growth and progression of adolescent scoliosis.
    Stokes IA
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 135():75-83. PubMed ID: 18401082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Cosmetic spinal prosthesis in irreparable spinal damage].
    Gellert J; Jedrysek M
    Wiad Lek; 1969 Sep; 22(18):1731-3. PubMed ID: 5364860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies on the biomechanical effect of a spinal adjustment.
    Triano JJ
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 1992 Jan; 15(1):71-5. PubMed ID: 1740656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Segmental spinal instrumentation for correction of scoliosis.
    Luque ER
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1982 Mar; (163):192-8. PubMed ID: 7067252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.