299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32704436)
21. Model for prioritizing best management practice implementation: sediment load reduction.
Jang T; Vellidis G; Hyman JB; Brooks E; Kurkalova LA; Boll J; Cho J
Environ Manage; 2013 Jan; 51(1):209-24. PubMed ID: 23142919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) in San Francisco Bay.
Davis JA; Hetzel F; Oram JJ; McKee LJ
Environ Res; 2007 Sep; 105(1):67-86. PubMed ID: 17451673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Physical characterization of a watershed through GIS: a study in the Schmidt stream, Brazil.
Reis DR; Plangg R; Tundisi JG; Quevedo DM
Braz J Biol; 2015 Dec; 75(4 Suppl 2):S16-29. PubMed ID: 26628241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of land use change, wetland fragmentation, and best management practices on total suspended sediment concentrations in an urbanizing Oregon watershed, USA.
Chang H; Makido Y; Foster E
J Environ Manage; 2021 Mar; 282():111962. PubMed ID: 33461091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Establishing aquatic restoration priorities using a watershed approach.
Bohn BA; Kershner JL
J Environ Manage; 2002 Apr; 64(4):355-63. PubMed ID: 12141156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Pathogen reduction co-benefits of nutrient best management practices.
Richkus J; Wainger LA; Barber MC
PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2713. PubMed ID: 27904807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ecological infrastructure planning of large river basin to promote nature conservation and ecosystem functions.
Huang L; Wang J; Chen X
J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 306():114482. PubMed ID: 35033894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Do reductions in agricultural field drainage during the growing season impact bacterial densities and loads in small tile-fed watersheds?
Wilkes G; Sunohara MD; Topp E; Gottschall N; Craiovan E; Frey SK; Lapen DR
Water Res; 2019 Mar; 151():423-438. PubMed ID: 30639728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Analyzing the impact of agricultural BMPs on stream nutrient load and biotic health in the Susquehanna-Chemung basin of New York.
Kua ZX; Davis CM; Townley LA; Stella JC; Shaw SB
J Environ Manage; 2023 Jun; 335():117521. PubMed ID: 36870193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Environmental and anthropogenic drivers of contaminants in agricultural watersheds with implications for land management.
Smalling KL; Devereux OH; Gordon SE; Phillips PJ; Blazer VS; Hladik ML; Kolpin DW; Meyer MT; Sperry AJ; Wagner T
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 774():145687. PubMed ID: 33609846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Water quality in South San Francisco Bay, California: current condition and potential issues for the South Bay Salt Pond Restoration Project.
Grenier JL; Davis JA
Rev Environ Contam Toxicol; 2010; 206():115-47. PubMed ID: 20652671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Assessing the potential of riparian reforestation to facilitate watershed climate adaptation.
Wu CL; Herrington SJ; Charry B; Chu ML; Knouft JH
J Environ Manage; 2021 Jan; 277():111431. PubMed ID: 33032001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A systematic assessment of watershed-scale nonpoint source pollution during rainfall-runoff events in the Miyun Reservoir watershed.
Qiu J; Shen Z; Wei G; Wang G; Xie H; Lv G
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2018 Mar; 25(7):6514-6531. PubMed ID: 29255977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of local land use on physical habitat, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish in the Whitewater River, Minnesota, USA.
Nerbonne BA; Vondracek B
Environ Manage; 2001 Jul; 28(1):87-99. PubMed ID: 11437003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Spatially-explicit modeling of multi-scale drivers of aboveground forest biomass and water yield in watersheds of the Southeastern United States.
Ajaz Ahmed MA; Abd-Elrahman A; Escobedo FJ; Cropper WP; Martin TA; Timilsina N
J Environ Manage; 2017 Sep; 199():158-171. PubMed ID: 28531796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluating the significance of wetland restoration scenarios on phosphorus removal.
Daneshvar F; Nejadhashemi AP; Adhikari U; Elahi B; Abouali M; Herman MR; Martinez-Martinez E; Calappi TJ; Rohn BG
J Environ Manage; 2017 May; 192():184-196. PubMed ID: 28160646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Inventorying and monitoring wetland condition and restoration potential on a watershed basis with examples from spring creek watershed, Pennsylvania, USA.
Brooks RP; Wardrop DH; Cole CA
Environ Manage; 2006 Oct; 38(4):673-87. PubMed ID: 16841177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of bacteria and benthic total maximum daily loads: a case study, Linville Creek, Virginia.
Benham BL; Brannan KM; Yagow G; Zeckoski RW; Dillaha TA; Mostaghimi S; Wynn JW
J Environ Qual; 2005; 34(5):1860-72. PubMed ID: 16151238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessing the cumulative impacts of geographically isolated wetlands on watershed hydrology using the SWAT model coupled with improved wetland modules.
Lee S; Yeo IY; Lang MW; Sadeghi AM; McCarty GW; Moglen GE; Evenson GR
J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():37-48. PubMed ID: 29886149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Riparian erosion vulnerability model based on environmental features.
Botero-Acosta A; Chu ML; Guzman JA; Starks PJ; Moriasi DN
J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 1):592-602. PubMed ID: 28318825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
