These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32705621)

  • 1. The multi-faceted nature of visual statistical learning: Individual differences in learning conditional and distributional regularities across time and space.
    Growns B; Siegelman N; Martire KA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Dec; 27(6):1291-1299. PubMed ID: 32705621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Redefining "Learning" in Statistical Learning: What Does an Online Measure Reveal About the Assimilation of Visual Regularities?
    Siegelman N; Bogaerts L; Kronenfeld O; Frost R
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):692-727. PubMed ID: 28986971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effects of individual differences and task difficulty on inattentional blindness.
    Simons DJ; Jensen MS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Apr; 16(2):398-403. PubMed ID: 19293113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial and nonspatial working memory and visual search.
    Takahashi J; Hatakeyama T
    Psychol Rep; 2011 Jun; 108(3):893-907. PubMed ID: 21879636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interference between nonspatial stimulus features in the Simon effect.
    Tagliabue M; Umiltà C; Spera P
    Am J Psychol; 2009; 122(4):431-53. PubMed ID: 20066924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Match me if you can: Evidence for a domain-general visual comparison ability.
    Growns B; Dunn JD; Mattijssen EJAT; Quigley-McBride A; Towler A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Jun; 29(3):866-881. PubMed ID: 34997551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forensic feature-comparison expertise: Statistical learning facilitates visual comparison performance.
    Growns B; Martire KA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Sep; 26(3):493-506. PubMed ID: 32150438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual-visual nonidentity matching assessment: a worthwhile addition to the assessment of basic learning abilities test.
    Sakko G; Martin TL; Vause T; Martin GL; Yu CT
    Am J Ment Retard; 2004 Jan; 109(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 14651450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tasks determine what is learned in visual statistical learning.
    Vickery TJ; Park SH; Gupta J; Berryhill ME
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Oct; 25(5):1847-1854. PubMed ID: 29159798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Assessment of Basic Learning Abilities (ABLA) test predicts the relative efficacy of task preferences for persons with developmental disabilities.
    Reyer HS; Sturmey P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2006 Jun; 50(Pt 6):404-9. PubMed ID: 16672034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A psychometrics of individual differences in experimental tasks.
    Rouder JN; Haaf JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):452-467. PubMed ID: 30911907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Linguistic entrenchment: Prior knowledge impacts statistical learning performance.
    Siegelman N; Bogaerts L; Elazar A; Arciuli J; Frost R
    Cognition; 2018 Aug; 177():198-213. PubMed ID: 29705523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical regularities guide the spatial scale of attention.
    Zhao J; Luo Y
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jan; 79(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 27844342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cross-modal nonspatial repetition inhibition.
    Wang L; Yue Z; Chen Q
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):867-78. PubMed ID: 22415447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical regularities induce spatial as well as feature-specific suppression.
    Failing M; Feldmann-Wüstefeld T; Wang B; Olivers C; Theeuwes J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1291-1303. PubMed ID: 31157536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does animacy affect visual statistical learning? Revisiting the effects of selective attention and animacy on visual statistical learning.
    Cox JA; Wu Y; Aimola Davies AM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Mar; 77(3):492-510. PubMed ID: 37089088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences.
    Mayr U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1996 Mar; 22(2):350-64. PubMed ID: 8901340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Splitting the variance of statistical learning performance: A parametric investigation of exposure duration and transitional probabilities.
    Bogaerts L; Siegelman N; Frost R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Aug; 23(4):1250-6. PubMed ID: 26743060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Working memory capacity and the top-down control of visual search: Exploring the boundaries of "executive attention".
    Kane MJ; Poole BJ; Tuholski SW; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):749-77. PubMed ID: 16822145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance as a function of ability, resources invested, and strategy used.
    Botella J; Peña D; Contreras MJ; Shih PC; Santacreu J
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Jan; 136(1):41-69. PubMed ID: 19192850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.