These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32705949)

  • 1. Effects of contrastive focus on lexical predictability during sentence reading: The case of
    Lowder MW; Ryan G; Opie J; Kaminsky E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jan; 74(1):179-186. PubMed ID: 32705949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pitch accents create dissociable syntactic and semantic expectations during sentence processing.
    van der Burght CL; Friederici AD; Goucha T; Hartwigsen G
    Cognition; 2021 Jul; 212():104702. PubMed ID: 33857845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discourse coherence modulates use of predictive processing during sentence comprehension.
    Carter GA; Hoffman P
    Cognition; 2024 Jan; 242():105637. PubMed ID: 37857052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Online processing of sentences containing noun modification in young children with high-functioning autism.
    Bavin EL; Prendergast LA; Kidd E; Baker E; Dissanayake C
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2016 Mar; 51(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 26215207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phonological versus semantic prediction in focus and repair constructions: No evidence for differential predictions.
    Karimi H; Brothers T; Ferreira F
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 Aug; 112():25-47. PubMed ID: 31078824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lexical predictability exerts robust effects on fixation duration, but not on initial landing position during reading.
    Vainio S; Hyönä J; Pajunen A
    Exp Psychol; 2009; 56(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 19261580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical Predictability During Natural Reading: Effects of Surprisal and Entropy Reduction.
    Lowder MW; Choi W; Ferreira F; Henderson JM
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Jun; 42 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1166-1183. PubMed ID: 29442360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The time course of semantic and syntactic processing in Chinese sentence comprehension: evidence from eye movements.
    Yang J; Wang S; Chen HC; Rayner K
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Dec; 37(8):1164-76. PubMed ID: 19933459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lexical and message-level sentence context effects on fixation times in reading.
    Morris RK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1994 Jan; 20(1):92-103. PubMed ID: 8138791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of only and even on online semantic interpretation.
    Filik R; Paterson KB; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2009 Aug; 16(4):678-83. PubMed ID: 19648452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The thematic hierarchy in sentence comprehension: A study on the interaction between verb class and word order in Spanish.
    Gattei CA; Dickey MW; Wainselboim AJ; París L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(10):1981-2007. PubMed ID: 25529525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Linguistic rhythm guides parsing decisions in written sentence comprehension.
    Kentner G
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 22217385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syntactic prediction during self-paced reading is age invariant.
    Cutter MG; Paterson KB; Filik R
    Br J Psychol; 2023 Feb; 114(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 36102378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Linguistic networks associated with lexical, semantic and syntactic predictability in reading: A fixation-related fMRI study.
    Carter BT; Foster B; Muncy NM; Luke SG
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():224-240. PubMed ID: 30654173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Semantic similarity, predictability, and models of sentence processing.
    Roland D; Yun H; Koenig JP; Mauner G
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):267-79. PubMed ID: 22197059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Misinterpretations in agreement and agreement attraction.
    Patson ND; Husband EM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(5):950-71. PubMed ID: 25624171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What's new? A comprehension bias in favor of informativity.
    Rohde H; Futrell R; Lucas CG
    Cognition; 2021 Apr; 209():104491. PubMed ID: 33545512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prosodic boundaries delay the processing of upcoming lexical information during silent sentence reading.
    Luo Y; Yan M; Zhou X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 May; 39(3):915-30. PubMed ID: 22774853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.