These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32705949)

  • 21. Constituent order and semantic parallelism in online comprehension: eye-tracking evidence from German.
    Knoeferle P; Crocker MW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2338-71. PubMed ID: 19418379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Semantic Predictability Facilitates Comprehension of Degraded Speech in a Graded Manner.
    Bhandari P; Demberg V; Kray J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714485. PubMed ID: 34566795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.
    DeDe G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2589-2602. PubMed ID: 28863409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Anticipating information structure: An event-related potentials study of focus assignment via the it-cleft.
    Alemán Bañón J; Martin C
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107203. PubMed ID: 31560886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of decay and lexical uncertainty on processing long-distance dependencies in reading.
    Stone K; von der Malsburg T; Vasishth S
    PeerJ; 2020; 8():e10438. PubMed ID: 33362963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic.
    Smith NJ; Levy R
    Cognition; 2013 Sep; 128(3):302-19. PubMed ID: 23747651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evidence for a difference in syntactic knowledge between skilled and less skilled adult readers.
    Cupples L; Holmes VM
    J Psycholinguist Res; 1992 Jul; 21(4):249-74. PubMed ID: 1403994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Do we rely on good-enough processing in reading under auditory and visual noise?
    Zdorova N; Malyutina S; Laurinavichyute A; Kaprielova A; Ziubanova A; Lopukhina A
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0277429. PubMed ID: 36693033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Word predictability blurs the lines between production and comprehension: Evidence from the production effect in memory.
    Rommers J; Dell GS; Benjamin AS
    Cognition; 2020 May; 198():104206. PubMed ID: 32035323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Verbal Semantics Drives Early Anticipatory Eye Movements during the Comprehension of Verb-Initial Sentences.
    Sauppe S
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():95. PubMed ID: 26903903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Robust effects of predictability across experimental contexts: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Zhang W; Chow WY; Liang B; Wang S
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Nov; 134():107229. PubMed ID: 31610184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Processing modifier-head agreement in reading: evidence for a delayed effect of agreement.
    Vainio S; Hyöna J; Pajunen A
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):329-40. PubMed ID: 18426064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
    Bartek B; Lewis RL; Vasishth S; Smith MR
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1178-98. PubMed ID: 21707210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Spatial distance effects on incremental semantic interpretation of abstract sentences: evidence from eye tracking.
    Guerra E; Knoeferle P
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):535-52. PubMed ID: 25215930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anticipatory looks reveal expectations about discourse relations.
    Rohde H; Horton WS
    Cognition; 2014 Dec; 133(3):667-91. PubMed ID: 25247235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effects of context on processing words during sentence reading among adults varying in age and literacy skill.
    Steen-Baker AA; Ng S; Payne BR; Anderson CJ; Federmeier KD; Stine-Morrow EAL
    Psychol Aging; 2017 Aug; 32(5):460-472. PubMed ID: 28816473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Beyond sentence boundaries: grammatical gender information in short-term recall of texts.
    Schweppe J; Rummer R; Fürstenberg A
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Jan; 37(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 19103977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.
    Kleinman D; Runnqvist E; Ferreira VS
    Cogn Psychol; 2015 Jun; 79():68-101. PubMed ID: 25917550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing.
    Smith G; Franck J; Tabor W
    Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101356. PubMed ID: 33285355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.