BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32707454)

  • 1. Sequential immunohistochemistry and virtual image reconstruction using a single slide for quantitative KI67 measurement in breast cancer.
    Serna G; Simonetti S; Fasani R; Pagliuca F; Guardia X; Gallego P; Jimenez J; Peg V; Saura C; Eppenberger-Castori S; Ramon Y Cajal S; Terracciano L; Nuciforo P
    Breast; 2020 Oct; 53():102-110. PubMed ID: 32707454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Digital image analysis of Ki67 proliferation index in breast cancer using virtual dual staining on whole tissue sections: clinical validation and inter-platform agreement.
    Koopman T; Buikema HJ; Hollema H; de Bock GH; van der Vegt B
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 29349710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prognostic potential of automated Ki67 evaluation in breast cancer: different hot spot definitions versus true global score.
    Robertson S; Acs B; Lippert M; Hartman J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2020 Aug; 183(1):161-175. PubMed ID: 32572716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison between Ki67 labeling index determined using image analysis software with virtual slide system and that determined visually in breast cancer.
    Maeda I; Abe K; Koizumi H; Nakajima C; Tajima S; Aoki H; Tsuchiya J; Tsuchiya S; Tsuchiya K; Shimo A; Tsugawa K; Ueno T; Tatsunami S; Takagi M
    Breast Cancer; 2016 Sep; 23(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 26271611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ki67 reproducibility using digital image analysis: an inter-platform and inter-operator study.
    Acs B; Pelekanou V; Bai Y; Martinez-Morilla S; Toki M; Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Rimm DL
    Lab Invest; 2019 Jan; 99(1):107-117. PubMed ID: 30181553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A methodology to ensure and improve accuracy of Ki67 labelling index estimation by automated digital image analysis in breast cancer tissue.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Laurinaviciene A; Herlin P; Meskauskas R; Baltrusaityte I; Besusparis J; Dasevicius D; Elie N; Iqbal Y; Bor C
    Breast Cancer Res; 2014; 16(2):R35. PubMed ID: 24708745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An international multicenter study to evaluate reproducibility of automated scoring for assessment of Ki67 in breast cancer.
    Rimm DL; Leung SCY; McShane LM; Bai Y; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Bayani J; Chang MC; Dean M; Denkert C; Enwere EK; Galderisi C; Gholap A; Hugh JC; Jadhav A; Kornaga EN; Laurinavicius A; Levenson R; Lima J; Miller K; Pantanowitz L; Piper T; Ruan J; Srinivasan M; Virk S; Wu Y; Yang H; Hayes DF; Nielsen TO; Dowsett M
    Mod Pathol; 2019 Jan; 32(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 30143750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A simple digital image analysis system for automated Ki67 assessment in primary breast cancer.
    Alataki A; Zabaglo L; Tovey H; Dodson A; Dowsett M
    Histopathology; 2021 Aug; 79(2):200-209. PubMed ID: 33590538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An interobserver reproducibility analysis of size-set semiautomatic counting for Ki67 assessment in breast cancer.
    Wang YX; Wang YY; Yang CG; Bu H; Yang WT; Wang L; Xu WM; Zhao XL; Zhao WX; Li L; Song SL; Yang JL
    Breast; 2020 Feb; 49():225-232. PubMed ID: 31911370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective quantification of the Ki67 proliferative index in neuroendocrine tumors of the gastroenteropancreatic system: a comparison of digital image analysis with manual methods.
    Tang LH; Gonen M; Hedvat C; Modlin IM; Klimstra DS
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Dec; 36(12):1761-70. PubMed ID: 23026928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proliferation assessment in breast carcinomas using digital image analysis based on virtual Ki67/cytokeratin double staining.
    Røge R; Riber-Hansen R; Nielsen S; Vyberg M
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Jul; 158(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 27283833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reliability of Ki67 visual scoring app compared to eyeball estimate and digital image analysis and its prognostic significance in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.
    Arun I; Venkatesh S; Ahmed R; Agrawal SK; Leung SCY
    APMIS; 2021 Aug; 129(8):489-502. PubMed ID: 34053140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validity and reliability of Ki-67 assessment in oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
    Jing N; Fang C; Williams DS
    Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):371-378. PubMed ID: 28450087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Comparison of Visual Assessment and Automated Digital Image Analysis of Ki67 Labeling Index in Breast Cancer.
    Zhong F; Bi R; Yu B; Yang F; Yang W; Shui R
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0150505. PubMed ID: 26928407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ki 67 assessment in breast cancer in an Egyptian population: a comparative study between manual assessment on optical microscopy and digital quantitative assessment.
    Ayad E; Soliman A; Anis SE; Salem AB; Hu P; Dong Y
    Diagn Pathol; 2018 Aug; 13(1):63. PubMed ID: 30153851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of automated Ki67 analysis to predict Oncotype DX risk-of-recurrence categories in early-stage breast cancer.
    Thakur SS; Li H; Chan AMY; Tudor R; Bigras G; Morris D; Enwere EK; Yang H
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0188983. PubMed ID: 29304138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analytical validation of a standardised scoring protocol for Ki67 immunohistochemistry on breast cancer excision whole sections: an international multicentre collaboration.
    Leung SCY; Nielsen TO; Zabaglo LA; Arun I; Badve SS; Bane AL; Bartlett JMS; Borgquist S; Chang MC; Dodson A; Ehinger A; Fineberg S; Focke CM; Gao D; Gown AM; Gutierrez C; Hugh JC; Kos Z; Laenkholm AV; Mastropasqua MG; Moriya T; Nofech-Mozes S; Osborne CK; Penault-Llorca FM; Piper T; Sakatani T; Salgado R; Starczynski J; Sugie T; van der Vegt B; Viale G; Hayes DF; McShane LM; Dowsett M;
    Histopathology; 2019 Aug; 75(2):225-235. PubMed ID: 31017314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automated assessment of Ki-67 in breast cancer: the utility of digital image analysis using virtual triple staining and whole slide imaging.
    Hida AI; Omanovic D; Pedersen L; Oshiro Y; Ogura T; Nomura T; Kurebayashi J; Kanomata N; Moriya T
    Histopathology; 2020 Sep; 77(3):471-480. PubMed ID: 32578891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bimodality of intratumor Ki67 expression is an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with invasive breast carcinoma.
    Laurinavicius A; Plancoulaine B; Rasmusson A; Besusparis J; Augulis R; Meskauskas R; Herlin P; Laurinaviciene A; Abdelhadi Muftah AA; Miligy I; Aleskandarany M; Rakha EA; Green AR; Ellis IO
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Apr; 468(4):493-502. PubMed ID: 26818835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Ki67 expression for breast cancer subtype classification and prognosis in the Nurses' Health Study.
    Healey MA; Hirko KA; Beck AH; Collins LC; Schnitt SJ; Eliassen AH; Holmes MD; Tamimi RM; Hazra A
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2017 Nov; 166(2):613-622. PubMed ID: 28791482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.