151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32707543)
1. Discrepancy between MRA and DSA in identifying the shape of small intracranial aneurysms.
Kwak Y; Son W; Kim YS; Park J; Kang DH
J Neurosurg; 2020 Jul; 134(6):1887-1893. PubMed ID: 32707543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Added diagnostic values of three-dimensional high-resolution proton density-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the circle-of-Willis: Comparison with time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography.
Yim Y; Jung SC; Kim JY; Kim SO; Kim BJ; Lee DH; Park W; Park JC; Ahn JS
PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0243235. PubMed ID: 33270756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of 3D TOF-MRA and 3D CE-MRA at 3T for imaging of intracranial aneurysms.
Cirillo M; Scomazzoni F; Cirillo L; Cadioli M; Simionato F; Iadanza A; Kirchin M; Righi C; Anzalone N
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e853-9. PubMed ID: 24103356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Limitations of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms.
Schwab KE; Gailloud P; Wyse G; Tamargo RJ
Neurosurgery; 2008 Jul; 63(1):29-34; discussion 34-5. PubMed ID: 18728566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow diverter: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography (3D-TOF-MRA) and contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) sequences with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard.
Attali J; Benaissa A; Soize S; Kadziolka K; Portefaix C; Pierot L
J Neurointerv Surg; 2016 Jan; 8(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 25352582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contrast-Enhanced and Time-of-Flight MRA at 3T Compared with DSA for the Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with the WEB Device.
Timsit C; Soize S; Benaissa A; Portefaix C; Gauvrit JY; Pierot L
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1684-9. PubMed ID: 27102311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils.
Ferré JC; Carsin-Nicol B; Morandi X; Carsin M; de Kersaint-Gilly A; Gauvrit JY; Desal HA
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Dec; 72(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 18809272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) follow-up as the primary imaging modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms.
Bakker NA; Westerlaan HE; Metzemaekers JD; van Dijk JM; Eshghi OS; Mooij JJ; Groen RJ
Acta Radiol; 2010 Mar; 51(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 20088646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnostic accuracy of 3D time-of-flight MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography for follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: influence of aneurysm size.
Deutschmann HA; Augustin M; Simbrunner J; Unger B; Schoellnast H; Fritz GA; Klein GE
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2007 Apr; 28(4):628-34. PubMed ID: 17416811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance angiography or digital subtraction catheter angiography for follow-up of coiled aneurysms: do we need both?
Lane A; Vivian P; Coulthard A
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 59(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 25857748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at 7 Tesla: Comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
Wrede KH; Matsushige T; Goericke SL; Chen B; Umutlu L; Quick HH; Ladd ME; Johst S; Forsting M; Sure U; Schlamann M
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jan; 27(1):354-364. PubMed ID: 26993650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intracranial aneurysm detection with 3T magnetic resonance angiography.
Tang PH; Hui F; Sitoh YY
Ann Acad Med Singap; 2007 Jun; 36(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 17597961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preoperative Digital Subtraction Angiography in Incidental Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms : How Much is too Much?
Herzberg M; Forbrig R; Schichor C; Brückmann H; Dorn F
Clin Neuroradiol; 2018 Sep; 28(3):429-435. PubMed ID: 29691597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils.
Majoie CB; Sprengers ME; van Rooij WJ; Lavini C; Sluzewski M; van Rijn JC; den Heeten GJ
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2005; 26(6):1349-56. PubMed ID: 15956496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnostic Performance of MRA for UnrupturedAneurysms at the Distal ICA.
He G; Wang J; Zhang Y; Li M; Lu H; Cheng Y; Zhu Y
Clin Neuroradiol; 2022 Jun; 32(2):507-515. PubMed ID: 35072753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of MR angiography in the pretreatment assessment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study.
Adams WM; Laitt RD; Jackson A
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2000 Oct; 21(9):1618-28. PubMed ID: 11039340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRA versus DSA for the follow-up imaging of intracranial aneurysms treated using endovascular techniques: a meta-analysis.
Ahmed SU; Mocco J; Zhang X; Kelly M; Doshi A; Nael K; De Leacy R
J Neurointerv Surg; 2019 Oct; 11(10):1009-1014. PubMed ID: 31048457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast-free MRA at 3.0 T for the detection of intracranial aneurysms.
Li MH; Li YD; Tan HQ; Gu BX; Chen YC; Wang W; Chen SW; Hu DJ
Neurology; 2011 Aug; 77(7):667-76. PubMed ID: 21775735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection and characterization of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: Comparison of 3T MRA and DSA.
Mine B; Pezzullo M; Roque G; David P; Metens T; Lubicz B
J Neuroradiol; 2015 Jun; 42(3):162-8. PubMed ID: 25454398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRA versus digital subtraction angiography in acute subarachnoid haemorrhage: a blinded multireader study of prospectively recruited patients.
Jäger HR; Mansmann U; Hausmann O; Partzsch U; Moseley IF; Taylor WJ
Neuroradiology; 2000 May; 42(5):313-26. PubMed ID: 10872150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
