127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32707699)
1. Experimental Design as a Tool for Optimizing and Predicting the Nanofiltration Performance by Treating Antibiotic-Containing Wastewater.
de Souza DI; Giacobbo A; da Silva Fernandes E; Rodrigues MAS; de Pinho MN; Bernardes AM
Membranes (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 32707699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effect of pH on Atenolol/Nanofiltration Membranes Affinity.
Soares EV; Giacobbo A; Rodrigues MAS; de Pinho MN; Bernardes AM
Membranes (Basel); 2021 Sep; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34564506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrafiltration and Nanofiltration for the Removal of Pharmaceutically Active Compounds from Water: The Effect of Operating Pressure on Electrostatic Solute-Membrane Interactions.
Giacobbo A; Pasqualotto IF; Machado Filho RCC; Minhalma M; Bernardes AM; Pinho MN
Membranes (Basel); 2023 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 37623804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhanced micropollutants removal by nanofiltration and their environmental risks in wastewater reclamation: A pilot-scale study.
Xu R; Qin W; Tian Z; He Y; Wang X; Wen X
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Nov; 744():140954. PubMed ID: 32755784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation of desalination by nanofiltration, reverse osmosis and integrated (hybrid NF/RO) membranes employed in brackish water treatment.
Talaeipour M; Nouri J; Hassani AH; Mahvi AH
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2017; 15():18. PubMed ID: 28736617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Removal of micropollutants from water by commercially available nanofiltration membranes.
Cuhorka J; Wallace E; Mikulášek P
Sci Total Environ; 2020 Jun; 720():137474. PubMed ID: 32325567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Removal of amoxicillin from wastewater by self-made Polyethersulfone membrane using nanofiltration.
Moarefian A; Golestani HA; Bahmanpour H
J Environ Health Sci Eng; 2014; 12(1):127. PubMed ID: 25379184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of cross flow velocity, feed concentration, and pressure on the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes in reactive dye having two sodium salts and NaCl mixtures: model application.
Koyuncu I; Topacik D
J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2004; 39(4):1055-68. PubMed ID: 15137719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of ion concentration and natural organic matter on arsenic(V) removal by nanofiltration under different transmembrane pressures.
Yu Y; Zhao C; Wang Y; Fan W; Luan Z
J Environ Sci (China); 2013 Feb; 25(2):302-7. PubMed ID: 23596950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Theoretical rejection of fifty-four antineoplastic drugs by different nanofiltration membranes.
Gouveia TIA; Alves A; Santos MSF
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Oct; 30(48):106099-106111. PubMed ID: 37723401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A QSAR model for predicting rejection of emerging contaminants (pharmaceuticals, endocrine disruptors) by nanofiltration membranes.
Yangali-Quintanilla V; Sadmani A; McConville M; Kennedy M; Amy G
Water Res; 2010 Jan; 44(2):373-84. PubMed ID: 19616272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes by dairy industry effluents.
Turan M; Ates A; Inanc B
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(12):355-60. PubMed ID: 12201123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rejection Capacity of Nanofiltration Membranes for Nickel, Copper, Silver and Palladium at Various Oxidation States.
Thabo B; Okoli BJ; Modise SJ; Nelana S
Membranes (Basel); 2021 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34564470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of flux (transmembrane pressure) and membrane properties on fouling and rejection of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes treating perfluorooctane sulfonate containing wastewater.
Tang CY; Fu QS; Criddle CS; Leckie JO
Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Mar; 41(6):2008-14. PubMed ID: 17410798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biological treatment and nanofiltration of denim textile wastewater for reuse.
Sahinkaya E; Uzal N; Yetis U; Dilek FB
J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(3):1142-8. PubMed ID: 17976906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Treatment of Electroplating Wastewater Using NF pH-Stable Membranes: Characterization and Application.
Hegoburu I; Zedda KL; Velizarov S
Membranes (Basel); 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33291325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Atenolol removal by nanofiltration: a case-specific mass transfer correlation.
Giacobbo A; Soares EV; Bernardes AM; Rosa MJ; de Pinho MN
Water Sci Technol; 2020 Jan; 81(2):210-216. PubMed ID: 32333654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Occurrence of Antibiotics, Antibiotic Resistance Genes and Viral Genomes in Wastewater Effluents and Their Treatment by a Pilot Scale Nanofiltration Unit.
Cristóvão MB; Tela S; Silva AF; Oliveira M; Bento-Silva A; Bronze MR; Crespo MTB; Crespo JG; Nunes M; Pereira VJ
Membranes (Basel); 2020 Dec; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33374743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Efficiency of RO/NF membranes at the removal of veterinary antibiotics.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Ašperger D; Košutić K
Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(2):317-23. PubMed ID: 22233911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of water matrices on removal of veterinary pharmaceuticals by nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes.
Dolar D; Vuković A; Asperger D; Kosutić K
J Environ Sci (China); 2011; 23(8):1299-307. PubMed ID: 22128537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]