200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32710502)
1. Evaluation of a commercial deformable image registration algorithm for dual-energy CT processing.
Huang JY; Lawless MJ; Matrosic CK; Di Maso LD; Miller JR
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 21(9):227-234. PubMed ID: 32710502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Stopping-power ratio estimation for proton radiotherapy using dual-energy computed tomography and prior-image constrained denoising.
Zimmerman J; Thor D; Poludniowski G
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1481-1495. PubMed ID: 36322128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of rigid and deformable motion correction algorithms using dual-energy CT images in view of application to CT perfusion measurements in abdominal organs affected by breathing motion.
Skornitzke S; Fritz F; Klauss M; Pahn G; Hansen J; Hirsch J; Grenacher L; Kauczor HU; Stiller W
Br J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 88(1046):20140683. PubMed ID: 25465353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of biomechanical deformable image registration in the abdomen, thorax, and pelvis in a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system.
Velec M; Moseley JL; Svensson S; Hårdemark B; Jaffray DA; Brock KK
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3407-3417. PubMed ID: 28453911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms.
Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Jason Stafford R; Zhou S; Court LE
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5153-5161. PubMed ID: 28622410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of CT scan parameters on deformable image registration accuracy using deformable thorax phantom.
Ikeda R; Kadoya N; Nakajima Y; Ishii S; Shibu T; Jingu K
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2023 May; 24(5):e13917. PubMed ID: 36840512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of deformable image registration between external beam radiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy for cervical cancer with a 3D-printed deformable pelvis phantom.
Kadoya N; Miyasaka Y; Nakajima Y; Kuroda Y; Ito K; Chiba M; Sato K; Dobashi S; Yamamoto T; Takahashi N; Kubozono M; Takeda K; Jingu K
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1445-1455. PubMed ID: 28214368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development of a dynamic deformable thorax phantom for the quality management of deformable image registration.
Sugawara Y; Kadoya N; Kotabe K; Nakajima Y; Ikeda R; Tanabe S; Ohashi H; Jingu K
Phys Med; 2020 Sep; 77():100-107. PubMed ID: 32823209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility and validation of biomechanical deformable image registration in low-contrast images.
Velec M; Juang T; Moseley JL; Oldham M; Brock KK
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(4):e401-8. PubMed ID: 25823381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantitative accuracy and dose efficiency of dual-contrast imaging using dual-energy CT: a phantom study.
Ren L; Rajendran K; McCollough CH; Yu L
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):441-456. PubMed ID: 31705664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of deformable image registration techniques for alignment of longitudinal cholangiocarcinoma CT images.
Sen A; Anderson BM; Cazoulat G; McCulloch MM; Elganainy D; McDonald BA; He Y; Mohamed ASR; Elgohari BA; Zaid M; Koay EJ; Brock KK
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1670-1679. PubMed ID: 31958147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An adaptive motion regularization technique to support sliding motion in deformable image registration.
Fu Y; Liu S; Li HH; Li H; Yang D
Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):735-747. PubMed ID: 29251777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Site-specific deformable imaging registration algorithm selection using patient-based simulated deformations.
Nie K; Chuang C; Kirby N; Braunstein S; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041911. PubMed ID: 23556905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multiparametric method to assess the MIM deformable image registration algorithm.
Calusi S; Labanca G; Zani M; Casati M; Marrazzo L; Noferini L; Talamonti C; Fusi F; Desideri I; Bonomo P; Livi L; Pallotta S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):75-82. PubMed ID: 30924286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A virtual phantom library for the quantification of deformable image registration uncertainties in patients with cancers of the head and neck.
Pukala J; Meeks SL; Staton RJ; Bova FJ; Mañon RR; Langen KM
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111703. PubMed ID: 24320411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of deformable image registration algorithms on CT images of ex vivo porcine bladders with fiducial markers.
Wognum S; Heethuis SE; Rosario T; Hoogeman MS; Bel A
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071916. PubMed ID: 24989394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration.
Thörnqvist S; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen LN; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 20831491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
