242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32711881)
21. Short-to-Midterm Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients With a Total Stabilizer Knee System.
Gwam CU; Chughtai M; Khlopas A; Mohamed N; Elmallah RK; Malkani AL; Mont MA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Aug; 32(8):2480-2483. PubMed ID: 28366313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Modified hybrid stem fixation in revision TKA is durable at 2 to 10 years.
Sah AP; Shukla S; Della Valle CJ; Rosenberg AG; Paprosky WG
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Mar; 469(3):839-46. PubMed ID: 20878290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Results of a Modular Revision System in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Crawford DA; Berend KR; Morris MJ; Adams JB; Lombardi AV
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Sep; 32(9):2792-2798. PubMed ID: 28502536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Modern full-component aseptic revision total knee arthroplasties have similar recoveries compared with primary total knee arthroplasty patients when applying an enhanced recovery anaesthetic and analgesic protocol.
Costales T; Chapman DM; Miller MJ; Dalury DF
Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):96-100. PubMed ID: 32475271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.
Peters CL; Hennessey R; Barden RM; Galante JO; Rosenberg AG
J Arthroplasty; 1997 Dec; 12(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 9458255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prosthesis survival after revision knee arthroplasty for "pain without loosening" versus "aseptic loosening": a Danish nationwide study.
Arndt KB; Schrøder HM; Troelsen A; Lindberg-Larsen M
Acta Orthop; 2022 Jan; 93():103-110. PubMed ID: 34906032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Midlevel Constraint Without Stem Extensions in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Provides Stability Without Compromising Fixation.
Crawford DA; Law JI; Lombardi AV; Berend KR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Sep; 33(9):2800-2803. PubMed ID: 29705681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Increased Risk of Revision, Reoperation, and Implant Constraint in TKA After Multiligament Knee Surgery.
Pancio SI; Sousa PL; Krych AJ; Abdel MP; Levy BA; Dahm DL; Stuart MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jun; 475(6):1618-1626. PubMed ID: 28091802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Midterm Clinical and Radiographic Results of Mobile-Bearing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kim RH; Martin JR; Dennis DA; Yang CC; Jennings JM; Lee GC
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Jun; 32(6):1930-1934. PubMed ID: 28209272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The early radiological follow-up of a medial rotational design of total knee arthroplasty.
Amin A; Al-Taiar A; Sanghrajka AP; Kang N; Scott G
Knee; 2008 Jun; 15(3):222-6. PubMed ID: 18280168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Risk Factors for Aseptic Loosening After Total Knee Arthroplasty with a Rotating-Hinge Implant: A Case-Control Study.
Levent A; Suero EM; Gehrke T; Citak M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 Mar; 103(6):517-523. PubMed ID: 33369984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Revision of a Medial UKA to a Kinematic Aligned TKA: Comparison of Operative Complexity, Postoperative Alignment, and Outcome Scores to a Primary TKA.
Shelton TJ; Gill M; Athwal G; Howell SM; Hull ML
J Knee Surg; 2021 Mar; 34(4):406-414. PubMed ID: 31499569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. 2017 Chitranjan S. Ranawat Award: Does Computer Navigation in Knee Arthroplasty Improve Functional Outcomes in Young Patients? A Randomized Study.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2018 Jan; 476(1):6-15. PubMed ID: 29389753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Isolated Versus Full Component Revision in Total Knee Arthroplasty for Aseptic Loosening.
Apinyankul R; Hwang K; Segovia NA; Amanatullah DF; Huddleston JI; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB
J Arthroplasty; 2023 Feb; 38(2):335-340. PubMed ID: 36099937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Rotating Hinge Implants for Complex Primary and Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kearns SM; Culp BM; Bohl DD; Sporer SM; Della Valle CJ; Levine BR
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Mar; 33(3):766-770. PubMed ID: 29129618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Autologous Impaction Bone Grafting for Bone Defects of the Medial Tibia Plateau During Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Propensity Score Matched Analysis With a Minimum of 7-Year Follow-Up.
Sohn JM; In Y; Jeon SH; Nho JY; Kim MS
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Aug; 33(8):2465-2470. PubMed ID: 29588122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Higher Frequency of Reoperation With a New Bicruciate-retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Christensen JC; Brothers J; Stoddard GJ; Anderson MB; Pelt CE; Gililland JM; Peters CL
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27043727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Is there a difference in total knee arthroplasty risk of revision in highly crosslinked versus conventional polyethylene?
Paxton EW; Inacio MC; Kurtz S; Love R; Cafri G; Namba RS
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Mar; 473(3):999-1008. PubMed ID: 25567357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. No Difference in Revision Rate Between Low Viscosity and High Viscosity Cement Used in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Klasan A; Rainbird S; Peng Y; Holder C; Parkinson B; Young SW; Lewis PL
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Oct; 37(10):2025-2034. PubMed ID: 35525417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Management of the bone loss by metaphyseal sleeves in primary and revision knee arthroplasty: clinical experience and outcome after forty three cases.
Gill UN; Ahmed N; Noor SS; Memon IA; Memon ZA
Int Orthop; 2020 Nov; 44(11):2315-2320. PubMed ID: 32556384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
