193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32712176)
1. ROC curves for clinical prediction models part 1. ROC plots showed no added value above the AUC when evaluating the performance of clinical prediction models.
Verbakel JY; Steyerberg EW; Uno H; De Cock B; Wynants L; Collins GS; Van Calster B
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Oct; 126():207-216. PubMed ID: 32712176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. An exponential model used for optimal threshold selection on ROC curves.
England WL
Med Decis Making; 1988; 8(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 3362039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of receiver operating characteristic curves in biomedical informatics.
Lasko TA; Bhagwat JG; Zou KH; Ohno-Machado L
J Biomed Inform; 2005 Oct; 38(5):404-15. PubMed ID: 16198999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Estimating the Area Under ROC Curve When the Fitted Binormal Curves Demonstrate Improper Shape.
Bandos AI; Guo B; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2017 Feb; 24(2):209-219. PubMed ID: 27884464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Graphical assessment of incremental value of novel markers in prediction models: From statistical to decision analytical perspectives.
Steyerberg EW; Vedder MM; Leening MJ; Postmus D; D'Agostino RB; Van Calster B; Pencina MJ
Biom J; 2015 Jul; 57(4):556-70. PubMed ID: 25042996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ongoing Challenges with Clinical Assessment of Nodal Status in T1 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.
Nobel TB; Barbetta A; Hsu M; Tan KS; Sihag S; Bains MS; Jones DR; Molena D
J Am Coll Surg; 2019 Oct; 229(4):366-373. PubMed ID: 31108196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Do prostate cancer risk models improve the predictive accuracy of PSA screening? A meta-analysis.
Louie KS; Seigneurin A; Cathcart P; Sasieni P
Ann Oncol; 2015 May; 26(5):848-864. PubMed ID: 25403590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reflection on modern methods: Revisiting the area under the ROC Curve.
Janssens ACJW; Martens FK
Int J Epidemiol; 2020 Aug; 49(4):1397-1403. PubMed ID: 31967640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calibration of risk prediction models: impact on decision-analytic performance.
Van Calster B; Vickers AJ
Med Decis Making; 2015 Feb; 35(2):162-9. PubMed ID: 25155798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Paired ROC Curves through a Two-Stage Test.
Yu W; Park E; Chang YC
J Biopharm Stat; 2015; 25(5):881-902. PubMed ID: 24905904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can A Multivariate Model for Survival Estimation in Skeletal Metastases (PATHFx) Be Externally Validated Using Japanese Patients?
Ogura K; Gokita T; Shinoda Y; Kawano H; Takagi T; Ae K; Kawai A; Wedin R; Forsberg JA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Sep; 475(9):2263-2270. PubMed ID: 28560532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying the Most Informative Prediction Tool for Cancer-specific Mortality After Radical Prostatectomy: Comparative Analysis of Three Commonly Used Preoperative Prediction Models.
Boehm K; Larcher A; Beyer B; Tian Z; Tilki D; Steuber T; Karakiewicz PI; Heinzer H; Graefen M; Budäus L
Eur Urol; 2016 Jun; 69(6):1038-43. PubMed ID: 26272236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. External validation of 2 models to predict necrosis/fibrosis in postchemotherapy residual retroperitoneal masses of patients with advanced testicular cancer.
Paffenholz P; Nestler T; Hoier S; Pfister D; Hellmich M; Heidenreich A
Urol Oncol; 2019 Nov; 37(11):809.e9-809.e18. PubMed ID: 31540832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Disadvantages of using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve to assess imaging tests: a discussion and proposal for an alternative approach.
Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S
Eur Radiol; 2015 Apr; 25(4):932-9. PubMed ID: 25599932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. What Factors Predict Adverse Discharge Disposition in Patients Older Than 60 Years Undergoing Lower-extremity Surgery? The Adverse Discharge in Older Patients after Lower-extremity Surgery (ADELES) Risk Score.
Schaefer MS; Hammer M; Platzbecker K; Santer P; Grabitz SD; Murugappan KR; Houle T; Barnett S; Rodriguez EK; Eikermann M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Mar; 479(3):546-547. PubMed ID: 33196587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three different tools for prediction of seminal vesicle invasion at radical prostatectomy.
Lughezzani G; Zorn KC; Budäus L; Sun M; Lee DI; Shalhav AL; Zagaya GP; Shikanov SA; Gofrit ON; Thong AE; Albala DM; Sun L; Cronin A; Vickers AJ; Karakiewicz PI
Eur Urol; 2012 Oct; 62(4):590-6. PubMed ID: 22561078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Solid pulmonary nodule risk assessment and decision analysis: comparison of four prediction models in 285 cases.
Perandini S; Soardi GA; Motton M; Rossi A; Signorini M; Montemezzi S
Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3071-6. PubMed ID: 26645862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating the effect of multiple genetic risk score models on colorectal cancer risk prediction.
Xin J; Chu H; Ben S; Ge Y; Shao W; Zhao Y; Wei Y; Ma G; Li S; Gu D; Zhang Z; Du M; Wang M
Gene; 2018 Oct; 673():174-180. PubMed ID: 29908285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The average receiver operating characteristic curve in multireader multicase imaging studies.
Chen W; Samuelson FW
Br J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 87(1040):20140016. PubMed ID: 24884728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Developing a Clinical Prediction Score: Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Integer Scores to Statistical Regression Models.
Subramanian V; Mascha EJ; Kattan MW
Anesth Analg; 2021 Jun; 132(6):1603-1613. PubMed ID: 33464759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
