282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32715400)
21. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study.
Nashikkar PS; Scholes CJ; Haber MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Dec; 28(12):e398-e409. PubMed ID: 31353300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. High intraoperative accuracy and low complication rate of computer-assisted navigation of the glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Larose G; Greene AT; Jung A; Polakovic SV; Davis NZ; Zuckerman JD; Virk MS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2023 Jun; 32(6S):S39-S45. PubMed ID: 36681107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.
Rosenthal Y; Rettig SA; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2564-2570. PubMed ID: 33190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Implications of navigation system use for glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Kida H; Urita A; Momma D; Matsui Y; Endo T; Kawamura D; Taneichi H; Iwasaki N
Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21190. PubMed ID: 36477208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Augmented reality navigation for spinal pedicle screw instrumentation using intraoperative 3D imaging.
Müller F; Roner S; Liebmann F; Spirig JM; Fürnstahl P; Farshad M
Spine J; 2020 Apr; 20(4):621-628. PubMed ID: 31669611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Accuracy of patient-specific guided implantation of the glenoid component in reversed shoulder arthroplasty.
Verborgt O; Hachem AI; Eid K; Vuylsteke K; Ferrand M; Hardy P
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2018 Oct; 104(6):767-772. PubMed ID: 29505820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of Preoperative Implant Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Hamilton MA; Polakovic S; Saadi P; Jones RB; Parsons IM; Cheung EV
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 26631196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Augmented-Reality-Assisted K-Wire Placement for Glenoid Component Positioning in Reversed Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Proof-of-Concept Study.
Schlueter-Brust K; Henckel J; Katinakis F; Buken C; Opt-Eynde J; Pofahl T; Rodriguez Y Baena F; Tatti F
J Pers Med; 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34442421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Emerging Technologies in Shoulder Arthroplasty: Navigation, Mixed Reality, and Preoperative Planning.
Jennewine BR; Brolin TJ
Orthop Clin North Am; 2023 Apr; 54(2):209-225. PubMed ID: 36894293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An In-Vitro Comparison of Mixed Reality Navigation to Traditional Freehand and Patient Specific Instrumentation Techniques for Glenoid Guide Pin Insertion during Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Fleet CT; Gao R; Johnson JA; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38908464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Computer-Assisted Surgery in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Early Experience.
Giorgini A; Tarallo L; Novi M; Porcellini G
Indian J Orthop; 2021 Aug; 55(4):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 34194658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Glenoid Component Placement Assisted by Augmented Reality Through a Head-Mounted Display During Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Rojas JT; Lädermann A; Ho SWL; Rashid MS; Zumstein MA
Arthrosc Tech; 2022 May; 11(5):e863-e874. PubMed ID: 35646556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Jacquot A; Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Baba M; Deransart P; Boileau P; Mole D; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2897-2906. PubMed ID: 29968136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Three-dimensional planning, navigation, patient-specific instrumentation and mixed reality in shoulder arthroplasty: a digital orthopedic renaissance.
Can Kolac U; Paksoy A; Akgün D
EFORT Open Rev; 2024 Jun; 9(6):517-527. PubMed ID: 38828974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The in vivo impact of computer navigation on screw number and length in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
Hones KM; King JJ; Schoch BS; Struk AM; Farmer KW; Wright TW
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):e629-e635. PubMed ID: 33647443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Preoperative planning of baseplate position in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: Still no consensus on lateralization, version and inclination.
Berhouet J; Jacquot A; Walch G; Deransart P; Favard L; Gauci MO
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2022 May; 108(3):103115. PubMed ID: 34653644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient-specific instrument guidance of glenoid component implantation reduces inclination variability in total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Heylen S; Van Haver A; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Feb; 25(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 26456430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Patient-specific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gauci MO; Boileau P; Baba M; Chaoui J; Walch G
Bone Joint J; 2016 Aug; 98-B(8):1080-5. PubMed ID: 27482021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
