185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32716126)
1. Machine learning outcome regression improves doubly robust estimation of average causal effects.
Choi BY; Wang CP; Gelfond J
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2020 Sep; 29(9):1120-1133. PubMed ID: 32716126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Double Robust Efficient Estimators of Longitudinal Treatment Effects: Comparative Performance in Simulations and a Case Study.
Tran L; Yiannoutsos C; Wools-Kaloustian K; Siika A; van der Laan M; Petersen M
Int J Biostat; 2019 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 30811344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Model misspecification and robustness in causal inference: comparing matching with doubly robust estimation.
Waernbaum I
Stat Med; 2012 Jul; 31(15):1572-81. PubMed ID: 22359267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Machine Learning for Causal Inference: On the Use of Cross-fit Estimators.
Zivich PN; Breskin A
Epidemiology; 2021 May; 32(3):393-401. PubMed ID: 33591058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving propensity score estimators' robustness to model misspecification using super learner.
Pirracchio R; Petersen ML; van der Laan M
Am J Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 181(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 25515168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Understanding and diagnosing the potential for bias when using machine learning methods with doubly robust causal estimators.
Bahamyirou A; Blais L; Forget A; Schnitzer ME
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jun; 28(6):1637-1650. PubMed ID: 29717941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stratified doubly robust estimators for the average causal effect.
Hattori S; Henmi M
Biometrics; 2014 Jun; 70(2):270-7. PubMed ID: 24571129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. AIPW: An R Package for Augmented Inverse Probability-Weighted Estimation of Average Causal Effects.
Zhong Y; Kennedy EH; Bodnar LM; Naimi AI
Am J Epidemiol; 2021 Dec; 190(12):2690-2699. PubMed ID: 34268567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Causal Inference in Observational Studies.
Schuler MS; Rose S
Am J Epidemiol; 2017 Jan; 185(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 27941068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inverse probability of treatment weighting with generalized linear outcome models for doubly robust estimation.
Gabriel EE; Sachs MC; Martinussen T; Waernbaum I; Goetghebeur E; Vansteelandt S; Sjölander A
Stat Med; 2024 Feb; 43(3):534-547. PubMed ID: 38096856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Propensity score and doubly robust methods for estimating the effect of treatment on censored cost.
Li J; Handorf E; Bekelman J; Mitra N
Stat Med; 2016 May; 35(12):1985-99. PubMed ID: 26678242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Model misspecification and bias for inverse probability weighting estimators of average causal effects.
Waernbaum I; Pazzagli L
Biom J; 2023 Feb; 65(2):e2100118. PubMed ID: 36045099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improving causal inference with a doubly robust estimator that combines propensity score stratification and weighting.
Linden A
J Eval Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 23(4):697-702. PubMed ID: 28116816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Doubly robust estimation of causal effects.
Funk MJ; Westreich D; Wiesen C; Stürmer T; Brookhart MA; Davidian M
Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Apr; 173(7):761-7. PubMed ID: 21385832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Targeted maximum likelihood estimation in safety analysis.
Lendle SD; Fireman B; van der Laan MJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S91-8. PubMed ID: 23849159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiply robust estimation of causal quantile treatment effects.
Xie Y; Cotton C; Zhu Y
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(28):4238-4251. PubMed ID: 32857876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Data-Adaptive Bias-Reduced Doubly Robust Estimation.
Vermeulen K; Vansteelandt S
Int J Biostat; 2016 May; 12(1):253-82. PubMed ID: 27227724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect Estimation in Point-Exposure Studies with Binary Outcomes and High-Dimensional Covariate Data - A Comparison of Targeted Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting.
Pang M; Schuster T; Filion KB; Schnitzer ME; Eberg M; Platt RW
Int J Biostat; 2016 Nov; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 27889705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Balance Super Learner: A robust adaptation of the Super Learner to improve estimation of the average treatment effect in the treated based on propensity score matching.
Pirracchio R; Carone M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Aug; 27(8):2504-2518. PubMed ID: 28339317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External control arm analysis: an evaluation of propensity score approaches, G-computation, and doubly debiased machine learning.
Loiseau N; Trichelair P; He M; Andreux M; Zaslavskiy M; Wainrib G; Blum MGB
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Dec; 22(1):335. PubMed ID: 36577946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
