These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32716540)

  • 1. Efficacy of Cleaning Methods for Ophthalmic Microscopic Instruments: A Comparison Study.
    Zhou W; Ye C; Huang X; Zhang P; Zheng S; Qin L; Chen Y
    AORN J; 2020 Aug; 112(2):112-121. PubMed ID: 32716540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Can protein contamination be removed from hand endodontic instruments?
    Whitworth CL; Davies K; Palmer NO
    Prim Dent Care; 2009 Jan; 16(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 19126346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A quantitative assessment of residual protein levels on dental instruments reprocessed by manual, ultrasonic and automated cleaning methods.
    Vassey M; Budge C; Poolman T; Jones P; Perrett D; Nayuni N; Bennett P; Groves P; Smith A; Fulford M; Marsh PD; Walker JT; Sutton JM; Raven ND
    Br Dent J; 2011 May; 210(9):E14. PubMed ID: 21372833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of ultrasonic cleaning schemes: a pilot study.
    Walker N; Burke FJ; Palenik CJ
    Prim Dent Care; 2006 Apr; 13(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 16608596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A cold water, ultrasonically activated stream efficiently removes proteins and prion-associated amyloid from surgical stainless steel.
    Secker TJ; Leighton TG; Offin DG; Birkin PR; Hervé RC; Keevil CW
    J Hosp Infect; 2020 Dec; 106(4):649-656. PubMed ID: 32956784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cleaning of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Linsuwanont P; Parashos P; Messer HH
    Int Endod J; 2004 Jan; 37(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 14718053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The use of ultrasound for cleaning the surface of stainless steel and nickel-titanium endodontic instruments.
    Filho MT; Leonardo MR; Bonifácio KC; Dametto FR; Silva AB
    Int Endod J; 2001 Dec; 34(8):581-5. PubMed ID: 11762494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Decontaminating dental instruments: testing the effectiveness of selected methods.
    Sanchez E; Macdonald G
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 126(3):359-62, 364, 366 passim. PubMed ID: 7897105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Instrument Set Decontamination Workflows Designed for Success in Sterile Processing.
    Mace Davis C; Spear JM
    AORN J; 2021 Aug; 114(2):149-157. PubMed ID: 34314002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of decontamination efficacy of cleaning solutions on stainless steel and glass surfaces contaminated by 10 antineoplastic agents.
    Queruau Lamerie T; Nussbaumer S; Décaudin B; Fleury-Souverain S; Goossens JF; Bonnabry P; Odou P
    Ann Occup Hyg; 2013 May; 57(4):456-69. PubMed ID: 23223271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Critical steps in instrument cleaning: removing debris after sonication.
    Burkhart NW; Crawford J
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):456-63. PubMed ID: 9103796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A SEM evaluation of debris removal from endodontic files after cleaning and steam sterilization procedures.
    Van Eldik DA; Zilm PS; Rogers AH; Marin PD
    Aust Dent J; 2004 Sep; 49(3):128-35. PubMed ID: 15497356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of usage history, instrument complexity, and different cleaning procedures on the cleanliness of blood-contaminated dental surgical instruments.
    Wu G; Yu X
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2009 Jul; 30(7):702-4. PubMed ID: 19496648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cleaning Efficiencies of Three Cleaning Agents on Four Different Surfaces after Contamination by Gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracile.
    Böhlandt A; Groeneveld S; Fischer E; Schierl R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2015; 12(6):384-92. PubMed ID: 25751496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of different cleaning procedures of implant drills using TC99.
    Parnia F; Hafezeqoran A; Mahmoudian B; Saati E; Moslehifard E; Koodaryan R; Mahboub F
    Implant Dent; 2013 Dec; 22(6):627-30. PubMed ID: 24168899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An energy-dispersive X-ray analysis and SEM study of debris remaining on endodontic instruments after ultrasonic cleaning and autoclave sterilization.
    Parirokh M; Asgary S; Eghbal MJ
    Aust Endod J; 2005 Aug; 31(2):53-8. PubMed ID: 16128252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of ultrasonic cleaning of dental instruments.
    Cafruny WA; Brunick A; Nelson DM; Nelson RF
    Am J Dent; 1995 Jun; 8(3):152-6. PubMed ID: 8599595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Efficacy of humidity retention bags for the reduced adsorption and improved cleaning of tissue proteins including prion-associated amyloid to surgical stainless steel surfaces.
    Secker TJ; Pinchin HE; Hervé RC; Keevil CW
    Biofouling; 2015; 31(6):535-41. PubMed ID: 26263927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of repeated sterilization and ultrasonic cleaning on curet blades.
    Stach DJ; Cross-Poline GN; Newman SM; Tilliss TS
    J Dent Hyg; 1995; 69(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 8632200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The investigation of ultrasound efficacy in cleaning the surface of new endodontic instruments].
    Popović J; Gasić J; Radicević G
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2009; 137(7-8):357-62. PubMed ID: 19764588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.