227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32716653)
1. Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.
Bovenzi CD; Manges KA; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 32716653
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Association Between Patient Value Systems and Physician and Practice Attributes Available Online.
Welshhans JL; Harmon JJ; Papel I; Gentile R; Mangat D; Byrne P; Collar RM
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Mar; 20(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 28859183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California.
Lewis P; Kobayashi E; Gupta S
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 25875912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists.
Calixto NE; Chiao W; Durr ML; Jiang N
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Aug; 127(8):521-526. PubMed ID: 29882425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology.
Basa K; Jabbour N; Rohlfing M; Schmoker S; Lawlor CM; Levi J; Sobin L; Tracy JC; Tracy LF
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Dec; 130(12):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 33813874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of social media presence, age, and patient reported wait times on physician review websites for sports medicine surgeons.
Sama AJ; Matichak DP; Schiller NC; Li DJ; Donnally CJ; Damodar D; Cole BJ
J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 Oct; 21():101502. PubMed ID: 34350098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you?
Sobin L; Goyal P
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jul; 140(7):635-8. PubMed ID: 24876073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction.
Chen J; Presson A; Zhang C; Ray D; Finlayson S; Glasgow R
J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():1-6. PubMed ID: 29804840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons: What Do Your Patients Really Think of You?
Vu AF; Espinoza GM; Perry JD; Chundury RV
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017; 33(6):466-470. PubMed ID: 27879621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]