These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32716653)

  • 1. Online Ratings of Facial Plastic Surgeons: Worthwhile Additions to Conventional Patient Experience Surveys.
    Bovenzi CD; Manges KA; Krein H; Heffelfinger R
    Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2021; 23(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 32716653
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How social media, training, and demographics influence online reviews across three leading review websites for spine surgeons.
    Donnally CJ; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Roth ES; Barker GP; McCormick JR; Rush AJ; Lebwohl NH
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):2081-2090. PubMed ID: 29709552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Online Patient Ratings of Hand Surgeons.
    Trehan SK; DeFrancesco CJ; Nguyen JT; Charalel RA; Daluiski A
    J Hand Surg Am; 2016 Jan; 41(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 26710742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How do physician demographics, training, social media usage, online presence, and wait times influence online physician review scores for spine surgeons?
    Donnally CJ; McCormick JR; Li DJ; Maguire JA; Barker GP; Rush AJ; Wang MY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Feb; 30(2):279-288. PubMed ID: 30497169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Predictive factors of positive online patient ratings of spine surgeons.
    Kalagara S; Eltorai AEM; DePasse JM; Daniels AH
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):182-185. PubMed ID: 30077043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating.
    Kadry B; Chu LF; Kadry B; Gammas D; Macario A
    J Med Internet Res; 2011 Nov; 13(4):e95. PubMed ID: 22088924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Provider-Initiated Patient Satisfaction Reporting Yields Improved Physician Ratings Relative to Online Rating Websites.
    Ricciardi BF; Waddell BS; Nodzo SR; Lange J; Nocon AA; Amundsen S; Tarity TD; McLawhorn AS
    Orthopedics; 2017 Sep; 40(5):304-310. PubMed ID: 28817163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Association Between Patient Value Systems and Physician and Practice Attributes Available Online.
    Welshhans JL; Harmon JJ; Papel I; Gentile R; Mangat D; Byrne P; Collar RM
    JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2018 Mar; 20(2):116-121. PubMed ID: 28859183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysis of Internet Review Site Comments for Spine Surgeons: How Office Staff, Physician Likeability, and Patient Outcome Are Associated With Online Evaluations.
    Donnally CJ; Roth ES; Li DJ; Maguire JA; McCormick JR; Barker GP; Rivera S; Lebwohl NH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Dec; 43(24):1725-1730. PubMed ID: 29975328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An online review of plastic surgeons in southern California.
    Lewis P; Kobayashi E; Gupta S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2015 May; 74 Suppl 1():S66-70. PubMed ID: 25875912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Online Ratings and Reviews of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Surgeons.
    Velasco BT; Chien B; Kwon JY; Miller CP
    Foot Ankle Spec; 2020 Feb; 13(1):43-49. PubMed ID: 30795702
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors Impacting Online Ratings for Otolaryngologists.
    Calixto NE; Chiao W; Durr ML; Jiang N
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2018 Aug; 127(8):521-526. PubMed ID: 29882425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Online ratings of orthopedic surgeons: analysis of 2185 reviews.
    Bakhsh W; Mesfin A
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2014 Aug; 43(8):359-63. PubMed ID: 25136868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing patient satisfaction among ABHRS surgeons: Opportunities to improve.
    Hakimi AA; Yasmeh JP; Foulad DS
    J Cosmet Dermatol; 2020 Feb; 19(2):462-465. PubMed ID: 31134743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Online Reputations: Comparing Hospital- and Patient-Generated Ratings in Academic Otolaryngology.
    Basa K; Jabbour N; Rohlfing M; Schmoker S; Lawlor CM; Levi J; Sobin L; Tracy JC; Tracy LF
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2021 Dec; 130(12):1317-1325. PubMed ID: 33813874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of social media presence, age, and patient reported wait times on physician review websites for sports medicine surgeons.
    Sama AJ; Matichak DP; Schiller NC; Li DJ; Donnally CJ; Damodar D; Cole BJ
    J Clin Orthop Trauma; 2021 Oct; 21():101502. PubMed ID: 34350098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Trends of online ratings of otolaryngologists: what do your patients really think of you?
    Sobin L; Goyal P
    JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2014 Jul; 140(7):635-8. PubMed ID: 24876073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patient-Recorded Physician Ratings: What Can We Learn From 11,527 Online Reviews of Orthopedic Surgeons?
    Yu J; Samuel LT; Yalçin S; Sultan AA; Kamath AF
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jun; 35(6S):S364-S367. PubMed ID: 31818501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Online physician review websites poorly correlate to a validated metric of patient satisfaction.
    Chen J; Presson A; Zhang C; Ray D; Finlayson S; Glasgow R
    J Surg Res; 2018 Jul; 227():1-6. PubMed ID: 29804840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online Ratings of ASOPRS Surgeons: What Do Your Patients Really Think of You?
    Vu AF; Espinoza GM; Perry JD; Chundury RV
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2017; 33(6):466-470. PubMed ID: 27879621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.