BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32716653)

  • 61. Do online reviews diminish physician authority? The case of cosmetic surgery in the U.S.
    Menon AV
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 May; 181():1-8. PubMed ID: 28363107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Online doctor reviews: do they track surgeon volume, a proxy for quality of care?
    Segal J; Sacopulos M; Sheets V; Thurston I; Brooks K; Puccia R
    J Med Internet Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):e50. PubMed ID: 22491423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Online ratings of spinal deformity surgeons: analysis of 634 surgeons.
    Melone G; Brodell J; Hernandez C; Menga E; Balkissoon R; Liu X; Zhang J; Mesfin A
    Spine Deform; 2020 Feb; 8(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 31925764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Building better pediatric surgeons: A sentiment analysis of online physician review websites.
    Butler LR; Tang JE; Hess SM; White CA; Arvind V; Kim JS; Allen AK; Ranade SC
    J Child Orthop; 2022 Dec; 16(6):498-504. PubMed ID: 36483646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Social Media Use and Its Impact on Physician Review Website Ratings in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty.
    Tamura S; Bonoan M; Berenfeld D; Rubin J; Seref-Ferlengez Z; Kamara E
    J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb; 39(2):295-299. PubMed ID: 37852445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Hand-washing practices of facial plastic surgeons.
    Leventhal DD; Lavasani L; Reiter D
    Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2009; 11(4):230-4. PubMed ID: 19620527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Characterizing Negative Online Reviews of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgeons.
    Richman EH; Ogbaudu E; Pollock JR; Brinkman JC; Moore ML; Arthur JR; Karlen JW
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2022 May-Jun 01; 42(5):e533-e537. PubMed ID: 35200216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. The Positive Patient Experience: A Comprehensive Analysis of Plastic Surgery Online Reviews.
    Chang IA; Wells MW; Chang IA; Arquette CP; Tang CJ; Gatherwright JR; Furnas HJ
    Aesthet Surg J; 2022 Aug; 42(9):1083-1093. PubMed ID: 35417545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. What Affects an Orthopaedic Surgeon's Online Rating? A Large-Scale, Retrospective Analysis.
    Patel MD; Williams MD; Thompson MJ; Desai PN
    J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev; 2022 Mar; 6(3):. PubMed ID: 35290257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Satisfaction with surgeon care as measured by the Surgery-CAHPS survey is not related to NSQIP outcomes.
    Schmocker RK; Cherney Stafford LM; Winslow ER
    Surgery; 2019 Mar; 165(3):510-515. PubMed ID: 30322662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Patient-Rated Trust of Spine Surgeons: Influencing Factors.
    Haglin JM; Eltorai AEM; Kalagara S; Kingrey B; Durand WM; Aidlen JP; Daniels AH
    Global Spine J; 2018 Oct; 8(7):728-732. PubMed ID: 30443484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Patient Comments on the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems Clinician and Group (CG-CAHPS) Survey Reflect Improvements in Provider Behaviors From Coaching.
    Quigley DD; Predmore Z; Martino S; Qureshi N; Hays RD
    J Healthc Manag; 2023 Jul-Aug 01; 68(4):251-267. PubMed ID: 37326612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Current trends in breast reconstruction: survey of American Society of Plastic Surgeons 2010.
    Gurunluoglu R; Gurunluoglu A; Williams SA; Tebockhorst S
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jan; 70(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 21862916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Happy and Unhappy Patients: A Quantitative Analysis of Online Plastic Surgeon Reviews for Breast Augmentation.
    Dorfman RG; Purnell C; Qiu C; Ellis MF; Basu CB; Kim JYS
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 May; 141(5):663e-673e. PubMed ID: 29697608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Factors Affecting Orthopedic Sports Medicine Surgeons' Online Reputation.
    Heimdal TR; Gardner SS; Dhanani UM; Harris JD; Liberman SR; McCulloch PC
    Orthopedics; 2021; 44(2):e281-e286. PubMed ID: 33316825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Patients' Online Perception and Ratings of Neurotologists.
    Goshtasbi K; Lehrich BM; Moshtaghi O; Abouzari M; Sahyouni R; Bagheri K; Moshtaghi A; Tajran SD; Lee L; Lin HW; Djalilian HR
    Otol Neurotol; 2019 Jan; 40(1):139-143. PubMed ID: 30531643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Consumer response to patient experience measures in complex information environments.
    Schlesinger M; Kanouse DE; Rybowski L; Martino SC; Shaller D
    Med Care; 2012 Nov; 50 Suppl():S56-64. PubMed ID: 23064278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Web-Based Physician Ratings for California Physicians on Probation.
    Murphy GP; Awad MA; Osterberg EC; Gaither TW; Chumnarnsongkhroh T; Washington SL; Breyer BN
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Aug; 19(8):e254. PubMed ID: 28830852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Comparing the Impact of Online Ratings and Report Cards on Patient Choice of Cardiac Surgeon: Large Observational Study.
    Li X; Chou SY; Deily ME; Qian M
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Oct; 23(10):e28098. PubMed ID: 34709192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Online Ratings of Neurosurgeons: An Examination of Web Data and its Implications.
    Cloney M; Hopkins B; Shlobin N; Dahdaleh NS
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Dec; 83(6):1143-1152. PubMed ID: 29618127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.