These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Preliminary study of the forces developed by practitioners during amalgam condensation. Blum JY; Micallef JP Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1999 Aug; 19(4):379-85. PubMed ID: 10709505 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Compressive strength and hardness of amalgam]. Omloo WP; Schuthof J Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1971; 78(8):310-2. PubMed ID: 5285579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Comparative study of compression resistance and hardness between 3 types of amalgam alloys]. Rodrigues JR; Pasin D; de Araújo MA Ars Curandi Odontol; 1979 Sep; 6(6):33-40. PubMed ID: 298182 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of the polishing technique at low or high speed on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam. Pedigoni Mde L; Centola AL; Froner IC; Turbino ML; Ribeiro SA Braz Dent J; 1991; 2(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 1819356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of polishing burs and stones on the micro-hardness of dental amalgam. Ribeiro SA; do Nascimento TN; Centola AL; Teixeira LC; Campos SM Braz Dent J; 1992; 2(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 1290913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of impact loading upon Class II amalgam restoration. Johnson BE ASDC J Dent Child; 1972; 39(3):206-14. PubMed ID: 4553905 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Compressive strength of dental amalgam. Espevik S Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1975; 68(5):181-4. PubMed ID: 1059266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The tensile creep characteristics of dental amalgam. I. Stress dependence. Cruickshanks-Boyd DW; Roswati N J Biomed Mater Res; 1981 Sep; 15(5):769-80. PubMed ID: 12659141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Measurement of dimensional change of dental amalgam during hardening by means of volume dilatometer (author's transl)]. Oizumi T Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1975 Sep; 16(36):207-10. PubMed ID: 1060705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison between hybrid composites and amalgam for posterior restorations]. Favero L; Berengo M; Pellegrini F G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1989; 8(2):72-5. PubMed ID: 2485794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of three cavity base materials under amalgam restorations. Gourley JM; Rose DE J Can Dent Assoc (Tor); 1972 Nov; 38(11):406-10. PubMed ID: 4508947 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Two-body sliding wear of a direct-filling silver alternative to amalgam. Xu HH; Giuseppetti AA; Eichmiller FC; Ives LK Quintessence Int; 1999 Mar; 30(3):199-208. PubMed ID: 10356574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Expansion of amalgam and the strength of dentin]. Kyselová J; Kysela B; Javornický J Cesk Stomatol; 1970 Jan; 70(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 5264669 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Compression strength, dimensional change and hardness of 2 amalgam alloys in relation to mixing time and delayed condensation]. Mesman Schultz BA Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1979 Jan; 86(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 297828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [The hardening of dental amalgams. 2. Studies on the hardness of amalgams]. Radewa L; Radeke KH Dtsch Stomatol; 1969 May; 19(5):348-51. PubMed ID: 5261878 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]