These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32717413)
1. The adaptability and challenges of autonomous vehicles to pedestrians in urban China. Wang K; Li G; Chen J; Long Y; Chen T; Chen L; Xia Q Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Sep; 145():105692. PubMed ID: 32717413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pedestrians' road-crossing behavior towards eHMI-equipped autonomous vehicles driving in segregated and mixed traffic conditions. Song Y; Jiang Q; Chen W; Zhuang X; Ma G Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Aug; 188():107115. PubMed ID: 37209555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Deciding when to cross in front of an autonomous vehicle: How child and adult pedestrians respond to eHMI timing and vehicle kinematics. Devi Subramanian L; O'Neal EE; Kim NY; Noonan M; Plumert JM; Kearney JK Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Jul; 202():107567. PubMed ID: 38669901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated Vehicles and Pedestrian Safety: Exploring the Promise and Limits of Pedestrian Detection. Combs TS; Sandt LS; Clamann MP; McDonald NC Am J Prev Med; 2019 Jan; 56(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 30337236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stated preference analysis of autonomous vehicle among bicyclists and pedestrians in Pittsburgh using Bayesian Networks. Imanishimwe D; Kumar A Accid Anal Prev; 2023 Nov; 192():107278. PubMed ID: 37683566 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framework based on pedestrian-vehicle interaction patterns. Ni Y; Wang M; Sun J; Li K Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Nov; 96():118-129. PubMed ID: 27521905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Interactions between autonomous vehicles and pedestrians at unsignalized mid-block crosswalks considering occlusions by opposing vehicles. Zhu H; Iryo-Asano M; Alhajyaseen WKM; Nakamura H; Dias C Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Dec; 163():106468. PubMed ID: 34773785 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings. Sucha M; Dostal D; Risser R Accid Anal Prev; 2017 May; 102():41-50. PubMed ID: 28259827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research of fatal car-to-pedestrian precrash scenarios for the testing of the active safety system in China. Tan Z; Che Y; Xiao L; Hu W; Li P; Xu J Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105857. PubMed ID: 33285448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What externally presented information do VRUs require when interacting with fully Automated Road Transport Systems in shared space? Merat N; Louw T; Madigan R; Wilbrink M; Schieben A Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Sep; 118():244-252. PubMed ID: 29615186 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pedestrian-vehicle crashes: Risk perception and responsibility attribution among children, adolescents and adults. Yu S; Wu Y; Mrug S; Wang H; Ridley S; Hu G; Schwebel DC J Inj Violence Res; 2020 Jan; 12(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 31786578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Severity of road crashes involving pedestrians in Metro Manila, Philippines. Verzosa N; Miles R Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Sep; 94():216-26. PubMed ID: 27340839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One Solution Fits All? Evaluating Different Communication Strategies of a Light-based External Human-Machine Interface for Differently Sized Automated Vehicles from a Pedestrian's Perspective. Lau M; Jipp M; Oehl M Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jun; 171():106641. PubMed ID: 35390700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Young and older adult pedestrians' behavior when crossing a street in front of conventional and self-driving cars. Dommes A; Merlhiot G; Lobjois R; Dang NT; Vienne F; Boulo J; Oliver AH; Crétual A; Cavallo V Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106256. PubMed ID: 34146938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pedestrian's risk-based negotiation model for self-driving vehicles to get the right of way. Gupta S; Vasardani M; Lohani B; Winter S Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Mar; 124():163-173. PubMed ID: 30660067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. How Do Human-Driven Vehicles Avoid Pedestrians in Interactive Environments? A Naturalistic Driving Study. Sun S; Zhang Z; Zhang Z; Deng P; Tian K; Wei C Sensors (Basel); 2022 Oct; 22(20):. PubMed ID: 36298210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors influencing safety perceptions of sharing roadways with autonomous vehicles among vulnerable roadway users. Rahman MT; Dey K; Dimitra Pyrialakou V; Das S J Safety Res; 2023 Jun; 85():266-277. PubMed ID: 37330876 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of perceived pedestrian safety on designing safer built environments. Aceves-González C; Ekambaram K; Rey-Galindo J; Rizo-Corona L Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Oct; 21(sup1):S84-S89. PubMed ID: 32926653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Lighting a Path for Autonomous Vehicle Communication: The Effect of Light Projection on the Detection of Reversing Vehicles by Older Adult Pedestrians. Mason B; Lakshmanan S; McAuslan P; Waung M; Jia B Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(22):. PubMed ID: 36429416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Analyzing vehicle-pedestrian interactions: Combining data cube structure and predictive collision risk estimation model. Noh B; Park H; Yeo H Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Feb; 165():106539. PubMed ID: 34929575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]