139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32718112)
1. Comparison of the second and third intercostal spaces regarding the use of internal mammary vessels as recipient vessels in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: An anatomical and clinical study.
Seong IH; Woo KJ
Arch Plast Surg; 2020 Jul; 47(4):333-339. PubMed ID: 32718112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The ideal intercostal space for internal mammary vessel exposure during total rib-sparing microvascular breast reconstruction: A critical evaluation.
Sasaki Y; Madada-Nyakauru RN; Samaras S; Oni G; Di Candia M; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Jun; 72(6):1000-1006. PubMed ID: 30824382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Perforator flap breast reconstruction using internal mammary perforator branches as a recipient site: an anatomical and clinical analysis.
Munhoz AM; Ishida LH; Montag E; Sturtz GP; Saito FL; Rodrigues L; Gemperli R; Ferreira MC
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Jul; 114(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 15220570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computed tomography angiographic study of internal mammary perforators and their use as recipient vessels for free tissue transfer in breast reconstruction.
Kanoi AV; Panchal KB; Sen S; Biswas G
Indian J Plast Surg; 2017; 50(1):50-55. PubMed ID: 28615810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. New surgical technique: Simultaneous use of contiguous intercostal spaces during total rib preservation exposure of the internal mammary vessels in microvascular breast reconstruction.
Oni G; Malata CM
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Sep; 72(9):1525-1529. PubMed ID: 31266736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The axillary versus internal mammary recipient vessel sites for breast reconstruction with diep flaps: a retrospective study of 256 consecutive cases.
Santanelli Di Pompeo F; Longo B; Sorotos M; Pagnoni M; Laporta R
Microsurgery; 2015 Jan; 35(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 24782202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Absent Internal Mammary Recipient Vein in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Muto M; Satake T; Masuda Y; Kobayashi S; Tamura S; Kobayashi S; Ohtake T; Maegawa J
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2020 Feb; 8(2):e2660. PubMed ID: 32309101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Various modifications to internal mammary vessel anastomosis in breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap.
Chen CK; Tai HC; Chien HF; Chen YB
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2010 May; 26(4):219-23. PubMed ID: 20169525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Use of both antegrade and retrograde internal mammary vessels in the bipedicled deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for unilateral breast reconstruction.
Hernandez Rosa J; Sherif RD; Torina PJ; Harmaty MA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2017 Jan; 70(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 28029602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predictors of internal mammary vessel diameter: A computed tomographic angiography-assisted anatomic analysis.
Cook JA; Tholpady SS; Momeni A; Chu MW
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Oct; 69(10):1340-8. PubMed ID: 27475336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Applications of rib sparing technique in internal mammary vessels exposure of abdominal free flap breast reconstructions: a 12-year single-center experience of 215 cases.
Zhang Q; Xiao Q; Guo R; Xiu B; Li L; Chi W; Gu Y; Wu J
Gland Surg; 2019 Oct; 8(5):477-485. PubMed ID: 31741878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Incidental finding of subclavian artery occlusion and subsequent hypoplastic internal mammary artery as a candidate recipient vessel in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.
Seong IH; Woo KJ
Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Nov; 46(6):599-602. PubMed ID: 31462029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anatomical features of a crossing vein connecting left and right internal mammary veins: A preliminary study with computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging.
Ueno M; Mori H; Uemura N; Kato S; Tanaka K
Microsurgery; 2024 Feb; 44(2):e31148. PubMed ID: 38343011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A decision-making algorithm for recipient vein selection in bipedicle deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap autologous breast reconstruction.
O'Neill AC; Ngan NC; Platt J; Mahomed A; Zhong T; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2014 Aug; 67(8):1089-93. PubMed ID: 24880573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Risk of Pneumothorax With Internal Mammary Vessel Utilization in Autologous Breast Reconstruction.
Kelling JA; Meade A; Adkins M; Zhang AY
Ann Plast Surg; 2021 Mar; 86(3S Suppl 2):S184-S188. PubMed ID: 33470623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The retrograde limb of internal mammary vessels as reliable recipient vessels in DIEP flap breast reconstruction: a clinical and radiological study.
Salgarello M; Visconti G; Barone-Adesi L; Cina A
Ann Plast Surg; 2015 Apr; 74(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 24051455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unilateral Internal Mammary Recipient Vessels for Bilateral DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Lee JH; Varon DE; Halvorson EG
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open; 2017 Jun; 5(6):e1359. PubMed ID: 28740774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Complications in unilateral versus bilateral deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap breast reconstructions: A multicentre study.
Beugels J; Hoekstra LT; Tuinder SM; Heuts EM; van der Hulst RR; Piatkowski AA
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2016 Sep; 69(9):1291-8. PubMed ID: 27236501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of retrograde limb of internal mammary vein in autologous breast reconstruction with DIEAP flap: anatomical and clinical study.
Al-Dhamin A; Bissell MB; Prasad V; Morris SF
Ann Plast Surg; 2014 Mar; 72(3):281-4. PubMed ID: 23238027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
