These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Computed tomography/oral implantology (I). Dental CT: a program for the computed tomographic imaging of the jaws: the principles and exposure technic]. Dula K; Buser D; Porcellini B; Berthold H; Schwarz M Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 1994; 104(4):450-9. PubMed ID: 8209215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Versatility of the subperiosteal implant utilizing CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging. Benjamin LS J Oral Implantol; 1987; 13(2):282-96. PubMed ID: 3268687 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The skull in three dimensions. CT scan]. Chanavaz M; Messiez-Poche P Chir Dent Fr; 1988 Mar; 58(417):47-55. PubMed ID: 3240693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed tomography in dental implantation surgery. Schwarz MS; Rothman SL; Chafetz N; Rhodes M Dent Clin North Am; 1989 Oct; 33(4):555-97. PubMed ID: 2680653 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The use of computed tomography in the preoperative planning for dental implants: a case presentation. Drexler J J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1988; 62(4):191-3. PubMed ID: 3151200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Digital radiology for implant treatment planning and evaluation. Jeffcoat MK Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 Nov; 21(4):203-7. PubMed ID: 1299635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. CT scan standard reconstruction technique for reliable jaw bone volume determination. Quirynen M; Lamoral Y; Dekeyser C; Peene P; van Steenberghe D; Bonte J; Baert AL Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1990; 5(4):384-9. PubMed ID: 2094657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complete mandibular subperiosteal implant fabricated from model generated from computer tomography data. James RA Implantologist; 1985; 3(2):35-7. PubMed ID: 3914447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Results of a multi-year study of endosseous and subperiosteal dental implants]. Randzio J; Kirlic E Zahnarztl Prax; 1984 Oct; 35(10):386, 388, 390-4. PubMed ID: 6594843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites. Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Restoring the partially edentulous patient in the aesthetic zone: computer-guided implant surgery. Abbo B; Razzoog ME Dent Today; 2007 Jul; 26(7):136, 138-40; quiz 140, 128. PubMed ID: 17708323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of diagnostic imaging in dental implantology. Abrahams JJ Radiol Clin North Am; 1993 Jan; 31(1):163-80. PubMed ID: 8419972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Pre-implant radiologic survey: current technics and trends]. Pasquet G; Cavezian R Actual Odontostomatol (Paris); 1987 Dec; 41(160 Spec No):777-85. PubMed ID: 3504667 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation. Di Giacomo GA; da Silva JV; da Silva AM; Paschoal GH; Cury PR; Szarf G J Periodontol; 2012 Apr; 83(4):410-9. PubMed ID: 21819249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]