These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32719123)

  • 21. Video Game Use, Acceptance, and Relationship Experiences: A Moderated Actor-Partner Interdependence Model.
    Norton A; Brown CC; Falbo R; Hogan B
    Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw; 2020 Jul; 23(7):453-458. PubMed ID: 32364759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An examination of accuracy and bias in perceptions of a partner's motives for health behaviour regulation.
    Berzins TL; LaBuda JE; Gere J
    Br J Health Psychol; 2018 Nov; 23(4):872-887. PubMed ID: 29882307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Couples' daily self-regulation: The Health Action Process Approach at the dyadic level.
    Berli C; Lüscher J; Luszczynska A; Schwarzer R; Scholz U
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0205887. PubMed ID: 30372470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Trait Emotional Intelligence and Relationship Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Dyadic Coping.
    Wollny A; Jacobs I; Pabel L
    J Psychol; 2020; 154(1):75-93. PubMed ID: 31524567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. General traits of personality and affectivity as predictors of satisfaction in intimate relationships: evidence from self- and partner-ratings.
    Watson D; Hubbard B; Wiese D
    J Pers; 2000 Jun; 68(3):413-49. PubMed ID: 10831308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The dyadic effects of Type D personality on health in romantic couples.
    Williams L; Ashford-Smith S; Cobban L; Fitzsimmons R; Sukhatme V; Hunter SC
    Psychol Health; 2020 Jul; 35(7):811-823. PubMed ID: 31637928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. When Times Get Tough: Savoring and Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Coping with a Stressful Life Event.
    Samios C; Khatri V
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2019 Mar; 32(2):125-140. PubMed ID: 30696329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Social Anhedonia and Romantic Relationship Processes.
    Assaad L; Lemay EP
    J Pers; 2018 Apr; 86(2):147-157. PubMed ID: 28002619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dyadic conflict, drinking to cope, and alcohol-related problems: A psychometric study and longitudinal actor-partner interdependence model.
    Lambe L; Mackinnon SP; Stewart SH
    J Fam Psychol; 2015 Oct; 29(5):697-707. PubMed ID: 26075735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Transactions between self-esteem and perceived conflict in romantic relationships: A 5-year longitudinal study.
    Richter J; Finn C
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(4):e0248620. PubMed ID: 33844689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Failure to capitalize on sharing good news with romantic partners: Exploring positivity deficits of socially anxious people with self-reports, partner-reports, and behavioral observations.
    Kashdan TB; Ferssizidis P; Farmer AS; Adams LM; McKnight PE
    Behav Res Ther; 2013 Oct; 51(10):656-68. PubMed ID: 23916635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Dyadic Test of the Association Between Trait Self-Control and Romantic Relationship Satisfaction.
    Zuo PY; Karremans JC; Scheres A; Kluwer ES; Burk WJ; Kappen G; Ter Kuile H
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():594476. PubMed ID: 33408667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Dyadic Perspective on Coping and its Effects on Relationship Quality and Psychological Distress in Couples Living with Chronic Pain: A Longitudinal Study.
    Mittinty MM; Kindt S; Mittinty MN; Bernardes S; Cano A; Verhofstadt L; Goubert L
    Pain Med; 2020 Feb; 21(2):e102-e113. PubMed ID: 31670787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Couple adjustment to a stressful life event: a dyadic investigation of the roles of positive reframing and perceived benefits.
    Samios C; Baran S
    Anxiety Stress Coping; 2018 Mar; 31(2):188-205. PubMed ID: 29272954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Minority stress and relationship functioning among young male same-sex couples: An examination of actor-partner interdependence models.
    Feinstein BA; McConnell E; Dyar C; Mustanski B; Newcomb ME
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2018 May; 86(5):416-426. PubMed ID: 29683699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Dyadic Approach to Understanding the Link Between Sexual Functioning and Sexual Satisfaction in Heterosexual Couples.
    Pascoal PM; Byers ES; Alvarez MJ; Santos-Iglesias P; Nobre PJ; Pereira CR; Laan E
    J Sex Res; 2018; 55(9):1155-1166. PubMed ID: 29028439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prayer and forgiveness: Beyond relationship quality and extension to marriage.
    Fincham FD; May RW
    J Fam Psychol; 2017 Sep; 31(6):734-741. PubMed ID: 28504520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Commitment in romantic relationships as a function of partners' encoding of important couple-related memories.
    Guilbault V; Philippe FL
    Memory; 2017 May; 25(5):595-606. PubMed ID: 27310766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Couples coping with sensory loss: A dyadic study of the roles of self- and perceived partner acceptance.
    Lehane CM; Nielsen T; Wittich W; Langer S; Dammeyer J
    Br J Health Psychol; 2018 Sep; 23(3):646-664. PubMed ID: 29602197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. When and why do ideal partner preferences affect the process of initiating and maintaining romantic relationships?
    Eastwick PW; Finkel EJ; Eagly AH
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2011 Nov; 101(5):1012-32. PubMed ID: 21707198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.